Paper · 2018 · American Journal of Plant Sciences

Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Waterhemp with Two-Pass Weed Control Strategies in Glyphosate/Dicamba-Resistant Soybean

Brittany K. Hedges; Nader Soltani; David C. Hooker; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Waterhemp is a small-seeded, dioecious, broadleaf weed that emerges throughout the growing season. If left uncontrolled, waterhemp interference can reduce soybean yield up to 73%. Glyphosate-resistant (GR) waterhemp was first discovered in one county in Ontario in 2014; as of 2017, it has been found in two other counties. Glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean can be sprayed with glyphosate and/or dicamba preplant (PP), preemergence (PRE) and/or postemergence (POST). The objective of this study was to determine the control of GR waterhemp in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean with PRE residual herbicides, glyphosate/dicamba applied POST or a two-pass program of a PRE residual herbicide followed by glyphosate/dicamba applied POST. At 8 weeks after application (WAA), pyroxasulfone (150 g ai ha-1), S-metolachlor/metribuzin (1943 g ai ha-1), pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone (300 g ai ha-1) and flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone (240 g ai ha-1), applied PRE, resulted in 71%, 85%, 82% and 90% GR waterhemp control, respectively. The same PRE herbicides, followed by glyphosate/dicamba (1800 g ae ha-1) POST, improved control to greater than 96%. This study concludes that a two-pass program of an effective soil applied residual herbicide followed by glyphosate/dicamba POST controlled GR waterhemp in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence pyroxasulfone controlled GR waterhemp by 71% at eight weeks.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
pyroxasulfone (150 g ai ha-1)e0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
GR waterhemp controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
71%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 8 weeks after application (WAA), pyroxasulfone (150 g ai ha-1), S-metolachlor/metribuzin (1943 g ai ha-1), pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone (300 g ai ha-1) and flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone (240 g ai ha-1), applied PRE, resulted in 71%, 85%, 82% and 90% GR waterhemp control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–1023 · show in text ↑
e1

“The objective of this study was to determine the control of GR waterhemp in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean with PRE residual herbicides, glyphosate/dicamba applied POST or a two-pass program of a PRE residual herbicide followed by glyphosate/dicamba applied POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence S-metolachlor/metribuzin controlled GR waterhemp by 85%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
S-metolachlor/metribuzin (1943 g ai ha-1)e0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
GR waterhemp controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 8 weeks after application (WAA), pyroxasulfone (150 g ai ha-1), S-metolachlor/metribuzin (1943 g ai ha-1), pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone (300 g ai ha-1) and flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone (240 g ai ha-1), applied PRE, resulted in 71%, 85%, 82% and 90% GR waterhemp control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–1023 · show in text ↑
e1

“The objective of this study was to determine the control of GR waterhemp in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean with PRE residual herbicides, glyphosate/dicamba applied POST or a two-pass program of a PRE residual herbicide followed by glyphosate/dicamba applied POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone controlled GR waterhemp by 82%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone (300 g ai ha-1)e0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
GR waterhemp controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 8 weeks after application (WAA), pyroxasulfone (150 g ai ha-1), S-metolachlor/metribuzin (1943 g ai ha-1), pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone (300 g ai ha-1) and flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone (240 g ai ha-1), applied PRE, resulted in 71%, 85%, 82% and 90% GR waterhemp control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–1023 · show in text ↑
e1

“The objective of this study was to determine the control of GR waterhemp in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean with PRE residual herbicides, glyphosate/dicamba applied POST or a two-pass program of a PRE residual herbicide followed by glyphosate/dicamba applied POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preemergence flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone controlled GR waterhemp by 90%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone (240 g ai ha-1)e0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
GR waterhemp controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 8 weeks after application (WAA), pyroxasulfone (150 g ai ha-1), S-metolachlor/metribuzin (1943 g ai ha-1), pyroxasulfone/sulfentrazone (300 g ai ha-1) and flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone (240 g ai ha-1), applied PRE, resulted in 71%, 85%, 82% and 90% GR waterhemp control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–1023 · show in text ↑
e1

“The objective of this study was to determine the control of GR waterhemp in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean with PRE residual herbicides, glyphosate/dicamba applied POST or a two-pass program of a PRE residual herbicide followed by glyphosate/dicamba applied POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Following preemergence herbicides with glyphosate/dicamba improved GR waterhemp control above 96%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
glyphosate/dicamba (1800 g ae ha-1) POSTe0
Interactor
waterhempe1weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
improvede0
Value
greater than 96%e0
Comparator
same PRE herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The same PRE herbicides, followed by glyphosate/dicamba (1800 g ae ha-1) POST, improved control to greater than 96%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“The objective of this study was to determine the control of GR waterhemp in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean with PRE residual herbicides, glyphosate/dicamba applied POST or a two-pass program of a PRE residual herbicide followed by glyphosate/dicamba applied POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–739 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded a two-pass residual herbicide followed by glyphosate/dicamba controlled GR waterhemp.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Interactor
waterhempe0weed
Outcome
two-pass program of an effective soil applied residual herbicide followed by glyphosate/dicamba POSTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study concludes that a two-pass program of an effective soil applied residual herbicide followed by glyphosate/dicamba POST controlled GR waterhemp in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1334 · show in text ↑

pyroxasulfone · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

sulfentrazone · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

dicamba · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 27 positive, 4 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

metribuzin · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 43 positive, 5 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

glyphosate · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 70 positive, 6 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

flumioxazin · control · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

herbicide · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

123 papers: 99 positive, 24 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.