Abstract
New irrigation methods under different nutritional element supplies for maize production was designed and tested for evaluate quantitative and qualitative parameters by split-plot arrangement according complete randomized block design with three replications. Different Irrigation regimes was belonged to main plots (Conventional furrow irrigation: CFI or A1, Alternate furrow irrigation: AFI or A2 and fixed furrow irrigation: FFI or A3). Sub plots consisted (B1): Nitrogen + Phosphorus + or N + P as Control (C), (B2): Nitrogen + Phosphorus + Potassium or N + P + K, (B3): Nitrogen + Phosphorus + Potassium + Zinc or N + P + K + Zn, (B4): Nitrogen + Phosphorus + Potassium + Zinc + Boron or N + P + K + Zn + B and (B5): Nitrogen + Phosphorus + Potassium + Zinc + Boron + Iron or N + P + K + Zn + B + Fe. Results of analysis of variance showed that the interaction effects of different irrigation regime and fertilizer combinations on the characteristics of N Concentration, P Concentration, K Concentration, N Uptake, P Uptake, K Uptake, Number of seeds per row, 1000 seeds weight, leaf area index (LAI), Radiation use efficiency, seed yield, biological yield, number of seeds per row, was significant at 5% probability level. Interaction effects of treatments of irrigation regime and fertilization indicate that the Zn foliar increased concentrations of these elements in the seed. The highest and lowest of N, P and K uptake, seed yield and LAI were 117.56, 42.73, 55.7 kg.ha-1, 12950 kg.ha-1 3.86 and 113.42, 17.4, 16 kg.ha-1, 8894 kg.ha-1, 2.41 from Alternate furrow irrigation and (C+K, Zn, B, Fe) fertilizer treatment and fixed furrow irrigation and control respectively. The highest of light use efficiency were obtained from Alternate furrow irrigation and conventional furrow irrigation and (C+K, Zn, B, Fe) fertilizer treatment with 0.175 kg.kcal-1.m-2. In order to utilize the water sources efficiently and increase corn production under limited water supply, we propose the use of circular irrigation care along with instance, K, Zn, B and Fe fertilizer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation regime and fertilizer combinations significantly interacted on N, P and K concentrations in maize.
- Treatment
- irrigation regime and fertilizer combinationse1
- Outcome
- N Concentration, P Concentration, K Concentratione1
Zea maysNot reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for maize production”
e1“the interaction effects of different irrigation regime and fertilizer combinations on the characteristics of N Concentration, P Concentration, K Concentration, N Uptake, P Uptake, K Uptake”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation regime and fertilizer combinations significantly interacted on N, P and K uptake in maize.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for maize production”
e1“the interaction effects of different irrigation regime and fertilizer combinations on the characteristics of N Concentration, P Concentration, K Concentration, N Uptake, P Uptake, K Uptake”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation regime and fertilizer combinations significantly interacted on seeds per row, 1000 seed weight and LAI in maize.
- Treatment
- irrigation regime and fertilizer combinationse1
- Outcome
- Number of seeds per row, 1000 seeds weight, leaf area index (LAI)e2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for maize production”
e1“the interaction effects of different irrigation regime and fertilizer combinations on the characteristics of N Concentration, P Concentration, K Concentration, N Uptake, P Uptake, K Uptake”
e2“Number of seeds per row, 1000 seeds weight, leaf area index (LAI), Radiation use efficiency, seed yield, biological yield, number of seeds per row, was significant at 5% probability level”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation regime and fertilizer combinations significantly interacted on radiation use efficiency, seed yield and biological yield in maize.
- Treatment
- irrigation regime and fertilizer combinationse1
- Outcome
- Radiation use efficiency, seed yield, biological yielde2
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for maize production”
e1“the interaction effects of different irrigation regime and fertilizer combinations on the characteristics of N Concentration, P Concentration, K Concentration, N Uptake, P Uptake, K Uptake”
e2“Number of seeds per row, 1000 seeds weight, leaf area index (LAI), Radiation use efficiency, seed yield, biological yield, number of seeds per row, was significant at 5% probability level”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar Zn increased concentrations of these elements in maize seed.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for maize production”
e3“the Zn foliar increased concentrations of these elements in the seed”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternate furrow irrigation with the C+K, Zn, B, Fe fertilizer treatment gave the highest maize seed yield, 12950 kg/ha, against 8894 kg/ha under fixed furrow irrigation and control.
- Treatment
- Alternate furrow irrigation and (C+K, Zn, B, Fe) fertilizer treatmente4
- Outcome
- seed yielde4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 12950 kg.ha-1e4
- Qualifier
- 8894 kg.ha-1e4
- Comparator
- fixed furrow irrigation and controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for maize production”
e4“The highest and lowest of N, P and K uptake, seed yield and LAI were 117.56, 42.73, 55.7 kg.ha-1, 12950 kg.ha-1 3.86 and 113.42, 17.4, 16 kg.ha-1, 8894 kg.ha-1, 2.41 from Alternate furrow irrigation and (C+K, Zn, B, Fe) fertilizer treatment and fixed furrow irrigation and control respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternate furrow irrigation with the C+K, Zn, B, Fe fertilizer treatment gave the highest LAI, 3.86, against 2.41 under fixed furrow irrigation and control.
- Treatment
- Alternate furrow irrigation and (C+K, Zn, B, Fe) fertilizer treatmente4
- Outcome
- LAIe4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 3.86e4
- Qualifier
- 2.41e4
- Comparator
- fixed furrow irrigation and controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for maize production”
e4“The highest and lowest of N, P and K uptake, seed yield and LAI were 117.56, 42.73, 55.7 kg.ha-1, 12950 kg.ha-1 3.86 and 113.42, 17.4, 16 kg.ha-1, 8894 kg.ha-1, 2.41 from Alternate furrow irrigation and (C+K, Zn, B, Fe) fertilizer treatment and fixed furrow irrigation and control respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternate furrow irrigation with the C+K, Zn, B, Fe fertilizer treatment gave the highest N, P and K uptake, against the lowest under fixed furrow irrigation and control.
- Treatment
- Alternate furrow irrigation and (C+K, Zn, B, Fe) fertilizer treatmente4
- Outcome
- N, P and K uptakee4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 117.56, 42.73, 55.7 kg.ha-1e4
- Qualifier
- 113.42, 17.4, 16 kg.ha-1e4
- Comparator
- fixed furrow irrigation and controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for maize production”
e4“The highest and lowest of N, P and K uptake, seed yield and LAI were 117.56, 42.73, 55.7 kg.ha-1, 12950 kg.ha-1 3.86 and 113.42, 17.4, 16 kg.ha-1, 8894 kg.ha-1, 2.41 from Alternate furrow irrigation and (C+K, Zn, B, Fe) fertilizer treatment and fixed furrow irrigation and control respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternate and conventional furrow irrigation with the C+K, Zn, B, Fe fertilizer treatment gave the highest light use efficiency, 0.175 kg.kcal-1.m-2.
- Treatment
- Alternate furrow irrigation and conventional furrow irrigation and (C+K, Zn, B, Fe) fertilizer treatmente5
- Outcome
- light use efficiencye5
- Direction
- higheste5
- Value
- 0.175 kg.kcal-1.m-2e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for maize production”
e5“The highest of light use efficiency were obtained from Alternate furrow irrigation and conventional furrow irrigation and (C+K, Zn, B, Fe) fertilizer treatment with 0.175 kg.kcal-1.m-2”
Claim · model-written summary
Circular irrigation together with K, Zn, B and Fe fertilizer is proposed for maize under limited water supply.
- Outcome
- the use of circular irrigation care along with instance, K, Zn, B and Fe fertilizere6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“for maize production”
e6“we propose the use of circular irrigation care along with instance, K, Zn, B and Fe fertilizer”
The same questions in other papers
iron atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
60 papers more in this group
See all 64 papers →iron atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →zinc atom · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
220 papers more in this group
See all 224 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
198 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
231 papers more in this group
See all 235 papers →zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
437 papers more in this group
See all 441 papers →iron atom · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →irrigation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
100 papers more in this group
See all 104 papers →irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
285 papers more in this group
See all 289 papers →8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.