Paper · 2018 · Grassland Science

Enhancement of α‐tocopherol by ensiling in barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Setsuro Sato; Ryuichi Uegaki; Jun‐ya Kawamura; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Experiments were conducted to document the enhancement of tocopherol (Toc), the main source of vitamin E in barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) plants, by ensiling. The Toc content of four genotypes of barley and wheat was significantly enhanced by ensiling in plastic bags, and enhancement rates were 109–337% in barley and 331–503% in wheat. The overall enhancement was driven by the α‐form isomer. A significant interaction of ensiling treatment by genotype was not found in the Toc content in either species, indicating that the enhancement of Toc by ensiling was consistent irrespective of genotypes in both crops. Significant Toc enhancement by ensiling was exclusively found in leaves. The enhancement of Toc was also confirmed in round bale silages in both crops, which is prevalent as preservation methods of forages in many countries worldwide. Tocopherol enhancement was speculated to be likely because of the free phytol derived from chlorophyll breakdown, which was released from chlorophyll in leaves during ensiling to be used in the biosynthesis of Toc.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ensiling significantly increased barley tocopherol by 109–337%.

Treatment
ensiling in plastic bagse0
Outcome
Toc contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
109–337%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Toc content of four genotypes of barley and wheat was significantly enhanced by ensiling in plastic bags, and enhancement rates were 109–337% in barley and 331–503% in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–379 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ensiling significantly increased wheat tocopherol by 331–503%.

Treatment
ensiling in plastic bagse0
Outcome
Toc contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
331–503%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Toc content of four genotypes of barley and wheat was significantly enhanced by ensiling in plastic bags, and enhancement rates were 109–337% in barley and 331–503% in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–379 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The α-form isomer drove tocopherol enhancement in both crops.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)Hordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
α‐form isomere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The overall enhancement was driven by the α‐form isomer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–97 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ensiling enhancement did not significantly differ by genotype in either crop.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)Hordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ensiling treatmente0
Outcome
Toc contente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant interaction of ensiling treatment by genotype was not found in the Toc content in either species, indicating that the enhancement of Toc by ensiling was consistent irrespective of genotypes in both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant tocopherol enhancement occurred exclusively in leaves.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)Hordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
ensilinge0
Outcome
Toce0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant Toc enhancement by ensiling was exclusively found in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Round bale silages also enhanced tocopherol in both crops.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)Hordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
round bale silagese0
Outcome
Toce0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enhancement of Toc was also confirmed in round bale silages in both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–97 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors speculated that chlorophyll breakdown supplies phytol for tocopherol biosynthesis.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)Hordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Compound
free phytole0
Outcome
Tocopherol enhancemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tocopherol enhancement was speculated to be likely because of the free phytol derived from chlorophyll breakdown, which was released from chlorophyll in leaves during ensiling to be used in the biosynthesis of Toc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–97 · show in text ↑

processing · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 14 positive, 8 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.