Paper · 2018 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Nitrogen Affects Wheat and Canola Silica Accumulation, Soil Silica Forms, and Crusting

Taylor Beard; Tai Maaz; Kristy Borrelli; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Raindrop‐induced crusting of mineral soils supporting wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) in the semiarid US Pacific Northwest reduces seedling establishment of late summer‐seeded winter crops during dry, hot conditions. Canola ( Brassica napus L.) integration is diversifying regional food, feed and fuel global markets. Subsequent shifts in recycled crop residue characteristics, including Si and crop fiber, may shift soil characteristics of traditional wheat‐dominated systems, potentially affecting their propensity to form soil crusts. In a greenhouse study, wheat and canola were fertilized with varying N rates. Increased N supply increased transpiration, shoot weight, and hemicellulose and cellulose yields, but with only minor increases in shoot Si and lignin yields. Both crops had similar increases in root Si with greater N‐stimulated transpiration. Two subsequent soil incubations were conducted to determine how Si, N fertilization, and crop residues from wheat and canola affected soil properties. In the first incubation, Si was applied as aqueous H 4 SiO 4 , which increased soil amorphous and water‐soluble Si (Si am and Si ws ), physical resistance, and crust thickness. Electron micrographs showed increased amorphous material, presumably a Si precipitate, on soil particles with increased Si application. Second, two Ritzville soils were treated with the canola or wheat shoot residues with and without N fertilizer. Nitrogen lowered soil pH, Si am , Si ws , surface resistance, and crust thickness; however, first‐time application of crop residue types had no short‐term effect on these parameters. Any impacts of lower Si returned by lower Si crop residues on soil physical properties likely require several rotational cycles of Si crop uptake and residue returns. Core Ideas Wheat and canola Si increases with N fertilizer, differently correlated to crop transpiration. Si residue contents are ranked: wheat shoot residue > canola shoot > wheat root = canola root. Canola residue returns less Si but more lignin to soil surface than wheat. Long‐term wheat Si recycling may increase soil physical impedance of seedling emergence. N fertilization lowers soil pH, soluble and amorphous Si, surface resistance, and crust thickness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More nitrogen increased transpiration, shoot weight, hemicellulose and cellulose yields.

Treatment
Increased N supplye0
Outcome
transpiration, shoot weight, and hemicellulose and cellulose yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased N supply increased transpiration, shoot weight, and hemicellulose and cellulose yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–710 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased nitrogen caused only minor increases in shoot Si and lignin yields.

Treatment
Increased N supplye1
Outcome
shoot Si and lignin yieldse0
Direction
minor increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with only minor increases in shoot Si and lignin yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increased N supply increased transpiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–656 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both crops similarly increased root Si with nitrogen-stimulated transpiration.

Treatment
N‐stimulated transpiratione0
Outcome
root Sie0
Direction
increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both crops had similar increases in root Si with greater N‐stimulated transpiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot residue contained more Si than canola shoot residue, while roots ranked equally.

Outcome
Si residue contentse0
Comparator
canola shoote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si residue contents are ranked: wheat shoot residue > canola shoot > wheat root = canola root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–1983 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola returned less Si but more lignin than wheat to soil surface.

Outcome
less Si but more lignin to soil surfacee0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Canola residue returns less Si but more lignin to soil surface than wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1985–2058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied Si increased soil amorphous and soluble Si, resistance, and crust thickness.

Treatment
aqueous H 4 SiO 4e0
Outcome
soil amorphous and water‐soluble Si (Si am and Si ws ), physical resistance, and crust thicknesse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si was applied as aqueous H 4 SiO 4 , which increased soil amorphous and water‐soluble Si (Si am and Si ws ), physical resistance, and crust thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher Si application increased amorphous material on soil particles.

Treatment
increased Si applicatione0
Outcome
amorphous material, presumably a Si precipitate, on soil particlese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Electron micrographs showed increased amorphous material, presumably a Si precipitate, on soil particles with increased Si application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen lowered soil pH, Si forms, surface resistance and crust thickness.

Treatment
Nitrogene0
Outcome
soil pH, Si am , Si ws , surface resistance, and crust thicknesse0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen lowered soil pH, Si am , Si ws , surface resistance, and crust thickness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1434–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-time crop residue application had no short-term effect on those soil parameters.

Treatment
first‐time application of crop residue typese0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
no short‐term effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“first‐time application of crop residue types had no short‐term effect on these parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–33 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 26 positive, 2 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: gas exchange · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.