Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif season of 2015 at the Research cum Instructional Farm, Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur to evaluate the effect of foliar nutrition on uptake of nutrients and economics of Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] under Vertisols of Chhattisgarh plains. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. The results revealed that application of RDF+spray of DAP @ 2% at pod initiations stages of crop growth resulted significantly higher uptake of nutrients N, P, K, and also positive effect on micronutrients and economics compared to the application of RDF+Water spray at pod initiation stage and RDF only. It also positive effect on micronutrients in soil such as activity of microbial population, improve seed quality and oil quality of soybean through regulate nutrient during pod filling stage when the soil are not able to provide nutrients, quality parameters and nutrient uptake of soybean were significantly influenced by foliar application of nutrients at different stages of crop. The foliar application of RDF+spray of DAP @ 2% recorded significantly higher net return of ` 60,279 with. B:C ratio of 3.07. Foliar spraying with 2% DAP at flowering and at early pod development in addition to soil application of NPK fertilizer was found to be more beneficial to improve the productivity of soybean than RDF application alone.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 2% DAP spray at pod initiation significantly increased N, P, and K uptake versus water spray or RDF alone.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- RDF+spray of DAP @ 2% at pod initiations stagese0
- Outcome
- uptake of nutrients N, P, Ke0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- RDF+Water spray at pod initiation stage and RDF onlye0
- Setting
- pod initiations stagese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of RDF+spray of DAP @ 2% at pod initiations stages of crop growth resulted significantly higher uptake of nutrients N, P, K, and also positive effect on micronutrients and economics compared to the application of RDF+Water spray at pod initiation stage and RDF only”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 2% DAP spray improved micronutrients and economics versus water spray or RDF alone.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- RDF+spray of DAP @ 2%e0
- Outcome
- micronutrients and economicse0
- Direction
- positivee0
- Comparator
- RDF+Water spray at pod initiation stage and RDF onlye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of RDF+spray of DAP @ 2% at pod initiations stages of crop growth resulted significantly higher uptake of nutrients N, P, K, and also positive effect on micronutrients and economics compared to the application of RDF+Water spray at pod initiation stage and RDF only”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar nutrients positively affected soil microbial activity, seed quality, and oil quality.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- foliar application of nutrientse1
- Outcome
- activity of microbial population, improve seed quality and oil qualitye0
- Direction
- positivee0
- Qualifier
- pod filling stagee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It also positive effect on micronutrients in soil such as activity of microbial population, improve seed quality and oil quality of soybean through regulate nutrient during pod filling stage”
e1“foliar application of nutrients at different stages of crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application significantly influenced soybean quality parameters and nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- foliar application of nutrientse0
- Outcome
- quality parameters and nutrient uptakee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“quality parameters and nutrient uptake of soybean were significantly influenced by foliar application of nutrients at different stages of crop”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 2% DAP spray produced net returns of ` 60,279.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- RDF+spray of DAP @ 2%e0
- Outcome
- net returne0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- ` 60,279e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The foliar application of RDF+spray of DAP @ 2% recorded significantly higher net return of ` 60,279 with. B:C ratio of 3.07”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF plus 2% DAP spray produced a B:C ratio of 3.07.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- RDF+spray of DAP @ 2%e0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Value
- 3.07e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The foliar application of RDF+spray of DAP @ 2% recorded significantly higher net return of ` 60,279 with. B:C ratio of 3.07”
t0“Soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar 2% DAP at flowering and early pod development was judged more beneficial for productivity than RDF alone.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- Foliar spraying with 2% DAP at flowering and at early pod developmente0
- Outcome
- more beneficial to improve the productivitye0
- Comparator
- RDF application alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar spraying with 2% DAP at flowering and at early pod development in addition to soil application of NPK fertilizer was found to be more beneficial to improve the productivity of soybean than RDF application alone”
The same questions in other papers
application · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
306 papers more in this group
See all 310 papers →application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
331 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
400 papers more in this group
See all 404 papers →fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1,188 papers more in this group
See all 1,192 papers →application · soil: biology · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.