Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Promotion of Nutrient Uptake, Nutrient Use Efficiency and Apparent Nutrient Recovery of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by Application of Phosphate and Potash Solubilizing Bacteria

N.V. Savaliya; Vipen Bhadu; R.A. Barsiya; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on calcareous clayey soil at Junagadh (Gujarat) during rabiseason of 2014-15 to study the effect of phosphate and potash solubilizing bacterial inoculations on of nutrient uptake, nutrient use Efficiency and apparent nutrient recovery of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The experimental results revealed that application of 45 kg P2O5/ha + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) seed inoculation + PSB soil application, being statistically at par with application of 45 kg P2O5 + PSB seed inoculation, significantly promoted phosphorus uptake by grain (17.98 kg/ha) and straw (5.72 kg/ha) as well as NUE of applied P (14.97 kg grain/kg P applied) and apparent nutrient recovery of P by 15.11%. While, Application of 45 kg K2O/ha + KSB seed inoculation + KSB soil application (K3) recorded significantly highest potassium uptake by grain (18.27 kg/ha) and straw (69.92 kg/ha). The treatment K3 (45 kg K2O/ha + KSB seed inoculation + KSB soil application) registered the highest potash use efficiency (15.73 kg grain/kg K applied) and apparent potash recovery (67.37%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate treatment with PSB seed and soil application significantly promoted phosphorus uptake by wheat grain to 17.98 kg/ha.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
45 kg P2O5/ha + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) seed inoculation + PSB soil applicatione0
Interactor
phosphate solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
phosphorus uptake by graine0
Direction
promotede0
Value
17.98 kg/hae0
Comparator
45 kg P2O5 + PSB seed inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 45 kg P2O5/ha + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) seed inoculation + PSB soil application, being statistically at par with application of 45 kg P2O5 + PSB seed inoculation, significantly promoted phosphorus uptake by grain (17.98 kg/ha) and straw (5.72 kg/ha) as well as NUE of applied P (14.97 kg grain/kg P applied) and apparent nutrient recovery of P by 15.11%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same phosphate treatment significantly promoted phosphorus uptake by wheat straw to 5.72 kg/ha.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
45 kg P2O5/ha + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) seed inoculation + PSB soil applicatione0
Interactor
phosphate solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
promotede0
Value
5.72 kg/hae0
Comparator
45 kg P2O5 + PSB seed inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 45 kg P2O5/ha + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) seed inoculation + PSB soil application, being statistically at par with application of 45 kg P2O5 + PSB seed inoculation, significantly promoted phosphorus uptake by grain (17.98 kg/ha) and straw (5.72 kg/ha) as well as NUE of applied P (14.97 kg grain/kg P applied) and apparent nutrient recovery of P by 15.11%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphate treatment significantly promoted applied phosphorus use efficiency to 14.97 kg grain/kg P applied.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
45 kg P2O5/ha + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) seed inoculation + PSB soil applicatione0
Interactor
phosphate solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
NUE of applied Pe0
Direction
promotede0
Value
14.97 kg grain/kg P appliede0
Comparator
45 kg P2O5 + PSB seed inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 45 kg P2O5/ha + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) seed inoculation + PSB soil application, being statistically at par with application of 45 kg P2O5 + PSB seed inoculation, significantly promoted phosphorus uptake by grain (17.98 kg/ha) and straw (5.72 kg/ha) as well as NUE of applied P (14.97 kg grain/kg P applied) and apparent nutrient recovery of P by 15.11%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The phosphate treatment promoted apparent phosphorus recovery by 15.11%.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
45 kg P2O5/ha + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) seed inoculation + PSB soil applicatione0
Interactor
phosphate solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
apparent nutrient recovery of Pe0
Direction
promotede0
Value
15.11%e0
Comparator
45 kg P2O5 + PSB seed inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 45 kg P2O5/ha + phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) seed inoculation + PSB soil application, being statistically at par with application of 45 kg P2O5 + PSB seed inoculation, significantly promoted phosphorus uptake by grain (17.98 kg/ha) and straw (5.72 kg/ha) as well as NUE of applied P (14.97 kg grain/kg P applied) and apparent nutrient recovery of P by 15.11%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potash treatment with KSB seed and soil application gave the significantly highest potassium uptake by wheat grain, 18.27 kg/ha.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
45 kg K2O/ha + KSB seed inoculation + KSB soil applicatione0
Interactor
KSBe0symbiont
Outcome
potassium uptake by graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.27 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 45 kg K2O/ha + KSB seed inoculation + KSB soil application (K3) recorded significantly highest potassium uptake by grain (18.27 kg/ha) and straw (69.92 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The potash treatment gave the significantly highest potassium uptake by wheat straw, 69.92 kg/ha.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
45 kg K2O/ha + KSB seed inoculation + KSB soil applicatione0
Interactor
KSBe0symbiont
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
69.92 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 45 kg K2O/ha + KSB seed inoculation + KSB soil application (K3) recorded significantly highest potassium uptake by grain (18.27 kg/ha) and straw (69.92 kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–905 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K3 gave the highest potash use efficiency, 15.73 kg grain/kg K applied.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
45 kg K2O/ha + KSB seed inoculation + KSB soil applicatione0
Interactor
KSBe0symbiont
Outcome
potash use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.73 kg grain/kg K appliede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment K3 (45 kg K2O/ha + KSB seed inoculation + KSB soil application) registered the highest potash use efficiency (15.73 kg grain/kg K applied) and apparent potash recovery (67.37%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K3 gave the highest apparent potash recovery, 67.37%.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
45 kg K2O/ha + KSB seed inoculation + KSB soil applicatione0
Interactor
KSBe0symbiont
Outcome
apparent potash recoverye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
67.37%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment K3 (45 kg K2O/ha + KSB seed inoculation + KSB soil application) registered the highest potash use efficiency (15.73 kg grain/kg K applied) and apparent potash recovery (67.37%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–116 · show in text ↑

inoculation · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

application · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

potassium · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 27 positive, 6 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 71 positive, 11 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 95 positive, 10 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 97 positive, 18 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.