Paper · 2018 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effect of preharvest fruit bagging on fruit quality characteristics and incidence of fruit physiopathies in fully irrigated and water stressed pomegranate trees

Isabel Griñán; Donaldo Morales; Alejandro Galindo; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
24
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This report studied the response of pomegranate fruit under full irrigation (FI) and water stress conditions to bagging with externally glossy, single-layer, cellulosic paper bags, open at the bottom, from the end of fruit thinning to harvest time. RESULTS: Bagging decreased fruit size and the maturity index, and increased antioxidant activity in FI conditions. Moreover, fruit bagging substantially reduced the incidence of peel sunburn in both irrigation conditions. CONCLUSION: The delay in fruit growth and ripening as a result of pomegranate fruit bagging is outweighed by the very important commercial benefit in terms of the reduced incidence of peel sunburn and the increase in fruit antioxidant activity. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging decreased pomegranate fruit size under full irrigation.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Bagginge0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
FI conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bagging decreased fruit size and the maturity index, and increased antioxidant activity in FI conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging decreased pomegranate maturity index under full irrigation.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Bagginge0
Outcome
maturity indexe0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
FI conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bagging decreased fruit size and the maturity index, and increased antioxidant activity in FI conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging increased pomegranate antioxidant activity under full irrigation.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Bagginge0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
FI conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bagging decreased fruit size and the maturity index, and increased antioxidant activity in FI conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–374 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–154 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging reduced pomegranate peel sunburn incidence under both irrigation conditions.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
fruit bagginge0
Outcome
incidence of peel sunburne0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
both irrigation conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit bagging substantially reduced the incidence of peel sunburn in both irrigation conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–154 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged the reduced sunburn and increased antioxidant activity to outweigh delayed growth and ripening from bagging.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
fruit bagginge0
Outcome
commercial benefite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The delay in fruit growth and ripening as a result of pomegranate fruit bagging is outweighed by the very important commercial benefit in terms of the reduced incidence of peel sunburn and the increase in fruit antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–726 · show in text ↑

trap barrier · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

trap barrier · disease · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

trap barrier · quality: phytochemicals · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.