Paper · 2013 · Journal of Plant Production

STUDIES ON THINNING, BAGGING AND ALUMINUM SILICATE SPRAYING ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF WANDERFULL POMEGRANATE

B. Samra; A. Shalan

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This investigation was carried out to study the effect of hand thinning, bagging and spraying with aluminum silicate on yield and fruit quality of Wanderfull pomegranate cv. The obtained results revealed that hand thinning alone or with bagging significantly reduced the number of fruits/tree than bagging only or spraying with aluminum silicate. Yet, the effect of these treatments was on yield/tree pronounced. Since, hand tinning alone or with bagging significantly increased both fruit weight and size than the control. The data also revealed that, bagging the fruit or spraying with aluminum silicate significantly reduced the percent of sunburn damages than hand thinning or the control. Bagging the fruits gave zero percent of sunburn. Furthermore, hand thinning with bagging or spraying the trees with aluminum silicate increased the values of soluble solids % and anthocyanin content in the skin of the fruits and in juice than hand thinning or the control. For protecting fruits of Wanderfull pomegranate from sunburn damage and improving fruit quality it is advised to use hand thinning with bagging.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand thinning alone reduced fruit number relative to bagging alone or aluminum silicate spray.

Taxon
POMEGRANATEPunica granatumt0
Treatment
hand thinning alonee0
Outcome
number of fruits/treee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
bagging only or spraying with aluminum silicatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WANDERFULL POMEGRANATE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand thinning alone or with bagging significantly reduced the number of fruits/tree than bagging only or spraying with aluminum silicate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand thinning with bagging reduced fruit number relative to bagging alone or aluminum silicate spray.

Taxon
POMEGRANATEPunica granatumt0
Treatment
hand thinning alone or with bagginge0
Outcome
number of fruits/treee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
bagging only or spraying with aluminum silicatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WANDERFULL POMEGRANATE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand thinning alone or with bagging significantly reduced the number of fruits/tree than bagging only or spraying with aluminum silicate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand thinning increased fruit weight and size relative to control.

Taxon
POMEGRANATEPunica granatumt0
Treatment
hand tinning alonee0
Outcome
fruit weight and sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WANDERFULL POMEGRANATE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand tinning alone or with bagging significantly increased both fruit weight and size than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand thinning with bagging increased fruit weight and size relative to control.

Taxon
POMEGRANATEPunica granatumt0
Treatment
hand tinning alone or with bagginge0
Outcome
fruit weight and sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WANDERFULL POMEGRANATE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand tinning alone or with bagging significantly increased both fruit weight and size than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 420–522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging reduced sunburn damage compared with thinning or control.

Taxon
POMEGRANATEPunica granatumt0
Treatment
bagging the fruite0
Outcome
percent of sunburn damagese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
hand thinning or the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WANDERFULL POMEGRANATE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“bagging the fruit or spraying with aluminum silicate significantly reduced the percent of sunburn damages than hand thinning or the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum silicate spray reduced sunburn damage compared with thinning or control.

Taxon
POMEGRANATEPunica granatumt0
Treatment
spraying with aluminum silicatee0
Outcome
percent of sunburn damagese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
hand thinning or the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WANDERFULL POMEGRANATE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“bagging the fruit or spraying with aluminum silicate significantly reduced the percent of sunburn damages than hand thinning or the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–692 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging yielded zero sunburn.

Taxon
POMEGRANATEPunica granatumt0
Treatment
Bagging the fruitse0
Outcome
sunburne0
Value
zero percente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WANDERFULL POMEGRANATE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Bagging the fruits gave zero percent of sunburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thinning with bagging increased soluble solids and skin and juice anthocyanin relative to thinning or control.

Taxon
POMEGRANATEPunica granatumt0
Organ / stage
skin of the fruits and in juicee0
Treatment
hand thinning with bagginge0
Outcome
soluble solids % and anthocyanin contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
hand thinning or the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WANDERFULL POMEGRANATE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand thinning with bagging or spraying the trees with aluminum silicate increased the values of soluble solids % and anthocyanin content in the skin of the fruits and in juice than hand thinning or the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum silicate spray increased soluble solids and skin and juice anthocyanin relative to thinning or control.

Taxon
POMEGRANATEPunica granatumt0
Organ / stage
skin of the fruits and in juicee0
Treatment
spraying the trees with aluminum silicatee0
Outcome
soluble solids % and anthocyanin contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
hand thinning or the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WANDERFULL POMEGRANATE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“hand thinning with bagging or spraying the trees with aluminum silicate increased the values of soluble solids % and anthocyanin content in the skin of the fruits and in juice than hand thinning or the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–965 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise thinning with bagging to protect fruit from sunburn and improve quality.

Taxon
Wanderfull pomegranatee0
Outcome
use hand thinning with bagginge0

Verbatim

t0

“WANDERFULL POMEGRANATE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“For protecting fruits of Wanderfull pomegranate from sunburn damage and improving fruit quality it is advised to use hand thinning with bagging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1110 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

trap barrier · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Paper bagging had similar acidity to membrane bagging.

    Effect of Paper Bags on Quality of Pomegranate · 2011 · compared with bagging membrane

    No difference from an alternative

  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

pruning · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.