Claim · model-written summary
Paper bagging had similar acidity to membrane bagging.
- Taxon
- pomegranate
Punica granatumt0 - Treatment
- bagging papere1
- Outcome
- aciditye0
- Direction
- equale0
- Comparator
- bagging membranee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the acidity was equal to bagging membrane”
e1“The concentration of sugar of bagging paper was significantly higher than bagging membrane,but the acidity was equal to bagging membrane”
t0“Effect of Paper Bags on Quality of Pomegranate”
Title
Effect of Paper Bags on Quality of Pomegranate
Shufen Zhang Northern Horticulture 2011
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Membrane bagging produced significantly heavier pomegranate fruit than paper bagging and no bagging.
- Intervention effect Membrane bagging gave a significantly lower fruit cracking rate than paper bagging and no bagging.
- Intervention effect Membrane bagging yielded significantly lower sugar concentration than paper bagging and no bagging.
- Intervention effect Membrane bagging yielded significantly lower acidity than paper bagging and no bagging.
- Intervention effect Paper bagging produced heavier fruit than no bagging.
- Observation Bagging was judged to enhance pomegranate production efficiency and improve taste, size uniformity and colour.