Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

The effect of ZnSO4and KNO3on quantitative and qualitative properties ofPunica granatumL.

Akram Safa; Leila Hakimi; Thomas Grant Pypker; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We investigated the effect of foliar application of potassium nitrate (KNO3) and zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) on the fruit quality of pomegranate (Punica granatum L. cv. Malas-E–Torsh in Saveh). Potassium was applied as KNO3 at concentrations of 0%, 0.25%, and 0.5% and zinc was applied as ZnSO4 at concentrations of 0%, 0.5%, and 1% in a completely randomized block design. To determine the effect of the treatments on fruit quality, we measured fruit weight, peel thickness, aril diameter, phenol content of the juice, pH, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), and antioxidant capacity. Foliar application of KNO3 significantly increased fruit weight, 100 aril weight, peel weight, peel thickness, TTS, and antioxidant capacity. In contrast, pH, TA, TSS/TA, and phenol content of the juice were not influenced by foliar application of KNO3. ZnSO4 significantly increased fruit weight, aril diameter, and phenol content of the juice. KNO3 1% and ZnSO4 0.5% were identified as the most appropriate treatments in improving quality and quantity of pomegranate. The fatty acid profile of the pomegranate oil was primarily composed of punicic acid, linoleic acid, oleic acid, palmitic acid, and stearic acid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 increased fruit weight, 100 aril weight and peel weight significantly.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume1
Treatment
Foliar application of KNO3e0
Outcome
fruit weight, 100 aril weight, peel weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of KNO3 significantly increased fruit weight, 100 aril weight, peel weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–689 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 increased peel thickness, TTS and antioxidant capacity significantly.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume1
Treatment
KNO3e0
Outcome
peel thickness, TTS, and antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KNO3 significantly increased fruit weight, 100 aril weight, peel weight, peel thickness, TTS, and antioxidant capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–736 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 did not influence pH, TA or TSS/TA.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume1
Treatment
foliar application of KNO3e0
Outcome
pH, TA, TSS/TAe0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pH, TA, TSS/TA, and phenol content of the juice were not influenced by foliar application of KNO3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–848 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 did not influence juice phenol content.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume1
Treatment
foliar application of KNO3e0
Outcome
phenol content of the juicee0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phenol content of the juice were not influenced by foliar application of KNO3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–848 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 increased fruit weight, aril diameter and juice phenol content significantly.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume1
Treatment
ZnSO4e0
Outcome
fruit weight, aril diameter, and phenol content of the juicee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ZnSO4 significantly increased fruit weight, aril diameter, and phenol content of the juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–940 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruit quality of pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–137 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors identified KNO3 1% as an appropriate treatment.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Outcome
KNO3 1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KNO3 1% and ZnSO4 0.5% were identified as the most appropriate treatments in improving quality and quantity of pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1064 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors identified ZnSO4 0.5% as an appropriate treatment.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Outcome
ZnSO4 0.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KNO3 1% and ZnSO4 0.5% were identified as the most appropriate treatments in improving quality and quantity of pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1064 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pomegranate oil fatty acids were primarily punicic, linoleic, oleic, palmitic and stearic acids.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Outcome
fatty acid profilee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fatty acid profile of the pomegranate oil was primarily composed of punicic acid, linoleic acid, oleic acid, palmitic acid, and stearic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1210 · show in text ↑

potassium nitrate · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: phytochemicals · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

potassium nitrate · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 47 positive, 1 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.