Paper · 2008 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Production of Pseudomonas fluorescens P-5 and P-6 for bean damping-off disease.

S Peighami-Ashnaei; A Sharifi-Tehrani; Masoud Ahmadzadeh; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Growth and efficacy of two biological control agents, Pseudomonas fluorescens Flugge, P-5 and P-6, were evaluated in combinations of two carbon (sucrose & molasses) and two nitrogen (urea & yeast extract) sources to optimize control of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn, which is a causal agent of bean damping-off. Both strains were grown in five liquid media including: sucrose + yeast extract, molasses + yeast extract (2:1 w/w), molasses + yeast extract (1:1 w/w), molasses + urea and nutrient broth at an initial inoculation of 1×10 CFU mL. Cells from overnight cultures were used to inoculate soil at 1×10 CFU cm soil. At the same time, fungal inoculum was added to soil at the rate of 2 mg cm soil. The medium containing molasses and yeast extract (1:1 w/w) supported rapid growth and high cell yields in both strains. In greenhouse conditions, the influence of the media on the biocontrol efficacy of P-5 and P-6 was the same and P. fluorescens P-6 in molasses + yeast extract (in two different ratios) reduced the severity of disease from 90.9% to less than 28%. On the other hand, there were significant differences on bean growth promotion in greenhouse conditions, after one month. Strain P-5 in molasses + yeast extract (1:1 w/w) was more effective on bean growth promotion as compared to the other media.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The molasses and yeast extract medium supported rapid growth and high cell yields in both biocontrol strains.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
molasses and yeast extract (1:1 w/w)e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescenst0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rapid growth and high cell yields in both strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The medium containing molasses and yeast extract (1:1 w/w) supported rapid growth and high cell yields in both strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pseudomonas fluorescens P-5 and P-6 for bean damping-off disease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The media had the same biocontrol efficacy for P-5 and P-6.

Taxon
beant0
Outcome
biocontrol efficacy of P-5 and P-6e0
Direction
the samee0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse conditions, the influence of the media on the biocontrol efficacy of P-5 and P-6 was the same”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-6 in molasses and yeast extract reduced disease severity from 90.9% to under 28%.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
P. fluorescens P-6 in molasses + yeast extracte0
Outcome
severity of diseasee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
less than 28%e0
Qualifier
90.9%e0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Verbatim

e0

“P. fluorescens P-6 in molasses + yeast extract (in two different ratios) reduced the severity of disease from 90.9% to less than 28%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“bean damping-off disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bean growth promotion differed significantly among media after one month.

Taxon
beane0
Outcome
bean growth promotione0
Qualifier
after one monthe0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“there were significant differences on bean growth promotion in greenhouse conditions, after one month”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P-5 in molasses and yeast extract was more effective for bean growth promotion than other media.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
Strain P-5 in molasses + yeast extract (1:1 w/w)e0
Interactor
P-5e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
bean growth promotione0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
the other mediae0

Verbatim

e0

“Strain P-5 in molasses + yeast extract (1:1 w/w) was more effective on bean growth promotion as compared to the other media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1307 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

molasses · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 29 positive, 4 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

botanical · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 50 positive, 38 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.