Paper · 2018 · Sustainability

Imposed Water Deficit after Anthesis for the Improvement of Macronutrients, Quality, Phytochemicals, and Antioxidants in Rice Grain

Ramin Rayee; Hoang-Dung Tran; Tran Dang Xuan; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The control of protein and amylose content is the principal challenge in rice nutrient and quality improvement. In this study, water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervals were imposed on two Japonica cultivars K1 and K3, and an Indica K4 subtype after anthesis to harvest. It was observed that although rice yield was affected, the protein content was increased 6.53–6.63% to 9.93–10.16%. The amylose quantity was reduced significantly from 22.00–22.43% to 16.33–17.56%, while fatty acids in rice grain were not influenced. Total anthocyanins were greatly promoted by 53.1% as compared to the non-treated trials. The antioxidant capacity in rice grain increased up to 59.1% in 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging and 41.6% in reducing power assays. Findings of this research revealed that the 3-day interval of water deficit imposition was the most effective to improve rice macronutrients and quality, as well as beneficial phytochemicals and antioxidants in rice grain. The water control after anthesis to harvest in rice cultivation is beneficial and economical for farmers to improve rice nutrients and quality, thus contributes to the sustainable rice production in many developing countries.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficits affected rice yield.

Material
K1 and K3e0
Treatment
water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervalse0
Outcome
rice yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervals were imposed on two Japonica cultivars K1 and K3, and an Indica K4 subtype after anthesis to harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–268 · show in text ↑
e1

“although rice yield was affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 291–323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficits increased rice grain protein content from 6.53–6.63% to 9.93–10.16%.

Treatment
water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervalse0
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
9.93–10.16%e1
Qualifier
6.53–6.63%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervals were imposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“the protein content was increased 6.53–6.63% to 9.93–10.16%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–384 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficits significantly reduced amylose quantity from 22.00–22.43% to 16.33–17.56%.

Treatment
water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervalse0
Outcome
amylose quantitye1
Direction
reducede1
Value
16.33–17.56%e1
Qualifier
22.00–22.43%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervals were imposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“The amylose quantity was reduced significantly from 22.00–22.43% to 16.33–17.56%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficits did not influence fatty acids in rice grain.

Treatment
water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervalse0
Outcome
fatty acids in rice graine1
Direction
not influencede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervals were imposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“fatty acids in rice grain were not influenced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 474–519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficits promoted total anthocyanins by 53.1% versus untreated trials.

Treatment
water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervalse0
Outcome
Total anthocyaninse1
Direction
promotede1
Value
53.1%e1
Comparator
non-treated trialse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervals were imposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total anthocyanins were greatly promoted by 53.1% as compared to the non-treated trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficits increased rice grain antioxidant capacity up to 59.1% in the DPPH assay.

Treatment
water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervalse0
Outcome
antioxidant capacity in rice graine1
Direction
increasede1
Value
59.1%e1
Qualifier
2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenginge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervals were imposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“The antioxidant capacity in rice grain increased up to 59.1% in 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficits increased rice grain antioxidant capacity by 41.6% in reducing power assays.

Treatment
water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervalse0
Outcome
antioxidant capacity in rice graine1
Direction
increasede1
Value
41.6%e1
Qualifier
reducing power assayse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water deficits in 2- and 3-day intervals were imposed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–180 · show in text ↑
e1

“The antioxidant capacity in rice grain increased up to 59.1% in 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging and 41.6% in reducing power assays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–764 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3-day water deficit interval was judged most effective for improving rice grain nutrients and quality.

Treatment
3-day interval of water deficit impositione0
Outcome
rice macronutrients and quality, as well as beneficial phytochemicals and antioxidantse0
Direction
most effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 3-day interval of water deficit imposition was the most effective to improve rice macronutrients and quality, as well as beneficial phytochemicals and antioxidants in rice grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–987 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend water control from anthesis to harvest to improve rice nutrients and quality economically.

Outcome
water control after anthesis to harvest in rice cultivatione0
Qualifier
beneficial and economical for farmerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The water control after anthesis to harvest in rice cultivation is beneficial and economical for farmers to improve rice nutrients and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1131 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

15 papers: 5 positive, 10 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

drought · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

16 papers: 7 positive, 9 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

drought · quality: oil · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.