Paper · 2020 · Bangladesh Journal of Botany

Effects of drought stress on pigment and protein contents and antioxidant enzyme activities in five varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Shukanta Saha; Hasna Hena Begum; Shamima Nasrin; et al.

12
claims
13
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Drought stress caused the decrease of pigment contents - chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a/b ratio, total chlorophyll content and carotenoids content of leaves of five rice varieties (var. BRRI Dhan-30, BRRI Dhan-32, BRRI Dhan-34, BRRI Dhan-38 and BRRI Dhan-56). Among five rice varieties, BRRI Dhan- 56 showed the least decrease of pigment content under stress. It caused the decrease of protein content of leaves of five rice varieties whereas BRRI Dhan-56 showed the least decrease (3.64%) of protein content under stress. On the other hand, drought stress increased CAT and SOD activities in the leaf of five varieties of rice and BRRI Dhan-56 showed the highest increase of CAT (37.67%) and SOD (94.17%) activity under stress. It may be assumed that higher antioxidant enzymes activities (CAT and SOD) and less reduction of protein content were related to the mechanisms of drought tolerance in rice. It is indicated that BRRI Dhan- 56 may be drought tolerant while BRRI Dhan-30, BRRI Dhan-32, BRRI Dhan-34 and BRRI Dhan-38 were drought sensitive rice varieties. Drought tolerant rice variety is selected based on pigment content, protein content and antioxidant enzymes activities (CAT and SOD).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and the chlorophyll a/b ratio in rice leaves.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a/b ratioe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress caused the decrease of pigment contents - chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a/b ratio, total chlorophyll content and carotenoids content of leaves of five rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased total chlorophyll and carotenoid contents in rice leaves.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content and carotenoids contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress caused the decrease of pigment contents - chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a/b ratio, total chlorophyll content and carotenoids content of leaves of five rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–192 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRI Dhan-56 showed the least decrease of pigment content among rice varieties under drought stress.

Material
BRRI Dhan- 56e1
Treatment
under stresse1
Outcome
pigment contente1
Direction
least decreasee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Among five rice varieties, BRRI Dhan- 56 showed the least decrease of pigment content under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress decreased protein content in rice leaves.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
protein contente2
Direction
decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“It caused the decrease of protein content of leaves of five rice varieties whereas BRRI Dhan-56 showed the least decrease (3.64%) of protein content under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–534 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought stress caused the decrease of pigment contents - chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a/b ratio, total chlorophyll content and carotenoids content of leaves of five rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–192 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRI Dhan-56 showed the least decrease (3.64%) of protein content under drought stress.

Material
BRRI Dhan-56e2
Treatment
under stresse2
Outcome
protein contente2
Direction
least decreasee2
Value
3.64%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“It caused the decrease of protein content of leaves of five rice varieties whereas BRRI Dhan-56 showed the least decrease (3.64%) of protein content under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–534 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased CAT and SOD activities in rice leaves.

Treatment
drought stresse3
Outcome
CAT and SOD activitiese3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“drought stress increased CAT and SOD activities in the leaf of five varieties of rice and BRRI Dhan-56 showed the highest increase of CAT (37.67%) and SOD (94.17%) activity under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–740 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRI Dhan-56 showed the highest CAT increase (37.67%) under stress.

Material
BRRI Dhan-56e3
Treatment
under stresse3
Outcome
CATe3
Direction
highest increasee3
Value
37.67%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“drought stress increased CAT and SOD activities in the leaf of five varieties of rice and BRRI Dhan-56 showed the highest increase of CAT (37.67%) and SOD (94.17%) activity under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–740 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRI Dhan-56 showed the highest SOD increase (94.17%) under stress.

Material
BRRI Dhan-56e3
Treatment
under stresse3
Outcome
SODe3
Direction
highest increasee3
Value
94.17%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“drought stress increased CAT and SOD activities in the leaf of five varieties of rice and BRRI Dhan-56 showed the highest increase of CAT (37.67%) and SOD (94.17%) activity under stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–740 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher antioxidant enzyme activities and less protein reduction may explain drought tolerance in rice.

Gene
CAT and SODe4
Outcome
mechanisms of drought tolerancee4
Qualifier
less reduction of protein contente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“higher antioxidant enzymes activities (CAT and SOD) and less reduction of protein content were related to the mechanisms of drought tolerance in rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–914 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRI Dhan-56 may be drought tolerant.

Taxon
rice varietiesOryza sativae5
Material
BRRI Dhan- 56e5
Outcome
drought tolerante5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“It is indicated that BRRI Dhan- 56 may be drought tolerant while BRRI Dhan-30, BRRI Dhan-32, BRRI Dhan-34 and BRRI Dhan-38 were drought sensitive rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1076 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BRRI Dhan-30, BRRI Dhan-32, BRRI Dhan-34 and BRRI Dhan-38 were drought sensitive.

Taxon
rice varietiesOryza sativae5
Material
BRRI Dhan-30, BRRI Dhan-32, BRRI Dhan-34 and BRRI Dhan-38e5
Outcome
drought sensitivee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“It is indicated that BRRI Dhan- 56 may be drought tolerant while BRRI Dhan-30, BRRI Dhan-32, BRRI Dhan-34 and BRRI Dhan-38 were drought sensitive rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1076 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-tolerant rice varieties should be selected on pigment content, protein content and CAT and SOD activities.

Taxon
rice varietyOryza sativae6
Outcome
Drought tolerant rice variety is selectede6
Qualifier
based on pigment content, protein content and antioxidant enzymes activities (CAT and SOD)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Drought tolerant rice variety is selected based on pigment content, protein content and antioxidant enzymes activities (CAT and SOD)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1210 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

16 papers: 7 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

34 papers: 24 positive, 10 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

42 papers: 6 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.