Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Influence of Drip Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertigation on Growth Parameters of Onion (Allium cepa L.)

Pooja Rani; V.K. Batra; A.K. Bhatia; et al.

14
claims
26
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2016-17 and 2017-18 at Research Farm of the Department of Vegetable Science, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar to study the effect of drip irrigation and nitrogen fertigation on plant height, leaf length, fresh and dry weight of onion leaves. The experiment was laid out with four levels of drip irrigation (60, 80, 100 and 120% of CPE) as main plots and four levels of nitrogen fertigation (75, 100, 125 and 150 kg/ha) as sub plots in a Split Plot Design and replicated three times with one control (surface irrigation and recommended dose of fertilizers). The seedlings of onion cv. Hisar Onion 4 were transplanted at 15 x 10 cm spacing in first week of January during both years. The maximum plant height (56.77 and 53.05 cm), leaf length (38.26 and 36.42 cm), fresh (38.36 and 37.59 g) and dry (4.69 and 5.46 g) weight of leaves per plant were recorded under drip irrigation at 120% CPE as compared to other levels of drip irrigation, while the lowest plant height (41.66 and 44.39 cm) and leaf length (24.59 and 25.40 cm), fresh (21.98 and 27.56 g) and dry (2.40 and 3.56 g) weight of leaves per plant were observed with the drip irrigation at 60% CPE during both years, respectively. Among the different levels of nitrogen fertigation, plant height (56.10 and 52.20 cm), leaf length (37.78 and 36.18c cm), fresh (34.34 and 38.44 g) and dry (4.21 and 5.76 g) weight of leaves per plant were observed maximum with the application of 150 kg/ha nitrogen through drip as compared to other levels of nitrogen fertigation, respectively. Interaction of irrigation and nitrogen fertigation also significantly affected the leaf length, fresh and dry weight of onion leaves per plant but the plant height did not differed significantly with the combined application of drip irrigation and nitrogen fertigation in both years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 120% CPE gave the maximum plant height relative to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 120% CPEe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
56.77 and 53.05 cme0
Comparator
other levels of drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum plant height (56.77 and 53.05 cm), leaf length (38.26 and 36.42 cm), fresh (38.36 and 37.59 g) and dry (4.69 and 5.46 g) weight of leaves per plant were recorded under drip irrigation at 120% CPE as compared to other levels of drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 120% CPE gave the maximum leaf length relative to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 120% CPEe0
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
38.26 and 36.42 cme0
Comparator
other levels of drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum plant height (56.77 and 53.05 cm), leaf length (38.26 and 36.42 cm), fresh (38.36 and 37.59 g) and dry (4.69 and 5.46 g) weight of leaves per plant were recorded under drip irrigation at 120% CPE as compared to other levels of drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 120% CPE gave the maximum fresh relative to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 120% CPEe0
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
38.36 and 37.59 ge0
Comparator
other levels of drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum plant height (56.77 and 53.05 cm), leaf length (38.26 and 36.42 cm), fresh (38.36 and 37.59 g) and dry (4.69 and 5.46 g) weight of leaves per plant were recorded under drip irrigation at 120% CPE as compared to other levels of drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 120% CPE gave the maximum dry relative to other irrigation levels.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 120% CPEe0
Outcome
drye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.69 and 5.46 ge0
Comparator
other levels of drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum plant height (56.77 and 53.05 cm), leaf length (38.26 and 36.42 cm), fresh (38.36 and 37.59 g) and dry (4.69 and 5.46 g) weight of leaves per plant were recorded under drip irrigation at 120% CPE as compared to other levels of drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–1003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 60% CPE gave the lowest plant height in both years.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 60% CPEe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
41.66 and 44.39 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“lowest plant height (41.66 and 44.39 cm) and leaf length (24.59 and 25.40 cm), fresh (21.98 and 27.56 g) and dry (2.40 and 3.56 g) weight of leaves per plant were observed with the drip irrigation at 60% CPE during both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 60% CPE gave the lowest leaf length in both years.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 60% CPEe0
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
24.59 and 25.40 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“lowest plant height (41.66 and 44.39 cm) and leaf length (24.59 and 25.40 cm), fresh (21.98 and 27.56 g) and dry (2.40 and 3.56 g) weight of leaves per plant were observed with the drip irrigation at 60% CPE during both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 60% CPE gave the lowest fresh in both years.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 60% CPEe0
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
21.98 and 27.56 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“lowest plant height (41.66 and 44.39 cm) and leaf length (24.59 and 25.40 cm), fresh (21.98 and 27.56 g) and dry (2.40 and 3.56 g) weight of leaves per plant were observed with the drip irrigation at 60% CPE during both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at 60% CPE gave the lowest dry in both years.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
drip irrigation at 60% CPEe0
Outcome
drye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
2.40 and 3.56 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“lowest plant height (41.66 and 44.39 cm) and leaf length (24.59 and 25.40 cm), fresh (21.98 and 27.56 g) and dry (2.40 and 3.56 g) weight of leaves per plant were observed with the drip irrigation at 60% CPE during both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1240 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg/ha nitrogen fertigation gave the maximum plant height relative to other nitrogen levels.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
150 kg/ha nitrogen through dripe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
56.10 and 52.20 cme0
Comparator
other levels of nitrogen fertigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height (56.10 and 52.20 cm), leaf length (37.78 and 36.18c cm), fresh (34.34 and 38.44 g) and dry (4.21 and 5.76 g) weight of leaves per plant were observed maximum with the application of 150 kg/ha nitrogen through drip as compared to other levels of nitrogen fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg/ha nitrogen fertigation gave the maximum leaf length relative to other nitrogen levels.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
150 kg/ha nitrogen through dripe0
Outcome
leaf lengthe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
37.78 and 36.18c cme0
Comparator
other levels of nitrogen fertigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height (56.10 and 52.20 cm), leaf length (37.78 and 36.18c cm), fresh (34.34 and 38.44 g) and dry (4.21 and 5.76 g) weight of leaves per plant were observed maximum with the application of 150 kg/ha nitrogen through drip as compared to other levels of nitrogen fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg/ha nitrogen fertigation gave the maximum fresh relative to other nitrogen levels.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
150 kg/ha nitrogen through dripe0
Outcome
freshe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
34.34 and 38.44 ge0
Comparator
other levels of nitrogen fertigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height (56.10 and 52.20 cm), leaf length (37.78 and 36.18c cm), fresh (34.34 and 38.44 g) and dry (4.21 and 5.76 g) weight of leaves per plant were observed maximum with the application of 150 kg/ha nitrogen through drip as compared to other levels of nitrogen fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 kg/ha nitrogen fertigation gave the maximum dry relative to other nitrogen levels.

Taxon
Onion (Allium cepa L.)Allium cepat0
Treatment
150 kg/ha nitrogen through dripe0
Outcome
drye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.21 and 5.76 ge0
Comparator
other levels of nitrogen fertigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“plant height (56.10 and 52.20 cm), leaf length (37.78 and 36.18c cm), fresh (34.34 and 38.44 g) and dry (4.21 and 5.76 g) weight of leaves per plant were observed maximum with the application of 150 kg/ha nitrogen through drip as compared to other levels of nitrogen fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and nitrogen fertigation interacted significantly for onion leaf length and fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
irrigation and nitrogen fertigatione0
Outcome
leaf length, fresh and dry weight of onion leaves per plante0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of irrigation and nitrogen fertigation also significantly affected the leaf length, fresh and dry weight of onion leaves per plant but the plant height did not differed significantly with the combined application of drip irrigation and nitrogen fertigation in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined drip irrigation and nitrogen fertigation did not significantly differ for onion plant height.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
combined application of drip irrigation and nitrogen fertigatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
did not differede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of irrigation and nitrogen fertigation also significantly affected the leaf length, fresh and dry weight of onion leaves per plant but the plant height did not differed significantly with the combined application of drip irrigation and nitrogen fertigation in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1602–1885 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

81 papers: 71 positive, 10 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

irrigation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 35 positive, 25 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 251 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

290 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.