Intervention effectmodel-written summary

More irrigation and nitrogen significantly increased onion plant growth.

A claim from Effect of Graded Nitrogen Fertilization Under Different Microsprinkling Irrigation Levels on Growth, Water Status, Bulb Yield, Water, and Nitrogen use Efficiency of Winter Onion · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

More irrigation and nitrogen significantly increased onion plant growth.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Increasing irrigation and nitrogene0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing irrigation and nitrogen significantly enhanced plant growth, leaf water status, chlorophyl content, nitrate reductase activity, and bulb yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–622
t0

“onion”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 172–177

Title

Effect of Graded Nitrogen Fertilization Under Different Microsprinkling Irrigation Levels on Growth, Water Status, Bulb Yield, Water, and Nitrogen use Efficiency of Winter Onion

Madhurima Banik; Sanmay Kumar Patra; Sudip Sengupta; et al. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 2026. doi:10.1002/nzc2.70143

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-8d20ff6cfab4c1fb97e6f6659898cf76e8ebbf3d30a2e136dff09d882bccddd3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

81 papers: 71 positive, 10 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

irrigation · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 35 positive, 25 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this claim · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.