Paper · 2018 · AN ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE

Growth, yield and bulb quality as influenced by sources and levels of sulphur in onion (Allium cepa L.) under calcareous soil of North Bihar

Anamika Kumari; Bindhyachal Ram; Udit Kumar; et al.

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at Tirhut College of Agriculture, RPCAU, Dholi, Muzaffarpur, Bihar during Rabi, 2010-11 to study the effect of sources and levels of sulphur on growth, yield and bulb quality in onion. The treatment consists of two sources of sulphur and four levels of sulphur by adopting Factorial RBD with three replications. The results on vegetative growth (plant height, number of leaves plant -1 and neck thickness), yield attributing parameters (bulb weight, equatorial and polar diameter), total bulb yield, physiological losses of weight (PLW) and total soluble solid (TSS) revealed significant variations among the levels of sulphur in onion. However, no significant variations were recorded between the sources of sulphur in onion, except bulb weight. Gypsum recorded higher plant height, neck thickness, average bulb weight, polar diameter, total bulb yield and TSS than elemental sulphur. Gypsum as a source of sulphur also reduces the production of doubles and bolter along with better shelflife of onion by reducing PLW, rotting and sprouting. Among the levels of sulphur, irrespective of sources, sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1 recorded significantly higher plant height (59.89 cm), number of leaves plant -1 (15.66), polar diameter (5.41 cm), equatorial diameter (5.21 cm), average bulb weight (66.00 g) , total bulb yield (241.33 q ha -1 ) and TSS (12.54%) than other levels. However, statistically parity was observed with application of sulphur @15 and 30 kg ha -1 for above mentioned parameters. Application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1 in form of gypsum may be recommended in onion crop for obtaining higher bulb yield having better keeping quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur levels significantly varied onion growth, yield and quality traits.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
levels of sulphure0
Outcome
total bulb yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vegetative growth (plant height, number of leaves plant -1 and neck thickness), yield attributing parameters (bulb weight, equatorial and polar diameter), total bulb yield, physiological losses of weight (PLW) and total soluble solid (TSS) revealed significant variations among the levels of sulphur in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur sources generally did not significantly differ, except bulb weight.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
sources of sulphure0
Outcome
no significant variationse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant variations were recorded between the sources of sulphur in onion, except bulb weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum raised height, neck thickness, bulb weight, diameter, yield and TSS relative to elemental sulfur.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Gypsume0
Outcome
plant height, neck thickness, average bulb weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
elemental sulphure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gypsum recorded higher plant height, neck thickness, average bulb weight, polar diameter, total bulb yield and TSS than elemental sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum reduced doubles and bolters.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
Gypsume0
Outcome
production of doubles and boltere0
Direction
reducese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gypsum as a source of sulphur also reduces the production of doubles and bolter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum improved shelf life through lower weight loss, rotting and sprouting.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Gypsume0
Outcome
PLW, rotting and sproutinge0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gypsum as a source of sulphur also reduces the production of doubles and bolter along with better shelflife of onion by reducing PLW, rotting and sprouting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 30 kg ha -1 produced plant height of 59.89 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
59.89 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1 recorded significantly higher plant height (59.89 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 30 kg ha -1 produced 15.66 leaves per plant.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1e1
Outcome
number of leaves plant -1e0
Value
15.66e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of leaves plant -1 (15.66)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1235 · show in text ↑
e1

“sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1 recorded significantly higher plant height (59.89 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 30 kg ha -1 produced polar diameter of 5.41 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1e1
Outcome
polar diametere0
Value
5.41 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“polar diameter (5.41 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1261 · show in text ↑
e1

“sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1 recorded significantly higher plant height (59.89 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 30 kg ha -1 produced equatorial diameter of 5.21 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1e1
Outcome
equatorial diametere0
Value
5.21 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“equatorial diameter (5.21 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1263–1292 · show in text ↑
e1

“sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1 recorded significantly higher plant height (59.89 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 30 kg ha -1 produced bulb weight of 66.00 g.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1e1
Outcome
average bulb weighte0
Value
66.00 ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average bulb weight (66.00 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1323 · show in text ↑
e1

“sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1 recorded significantly higher plant height (59.89 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 30 kg ha -1 produced bulb yield of 241.33 q ha -1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1e1
Outcome
total bulb yielde0
Value
241.33 q ha -1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total bulb yield (241.33 q ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1360 · show in text ↑
e1

“sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1 recorded significantly higher plant height (59.89 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 30 kg ha -1 produced TSS of 12.54%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1e1
Outcome
TSSe0
Value
12.54%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“TSS (12.54%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1377 · show in text ↑
e1

“sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1 recorded significantly higher plant height (59.89 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1200 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 15 and 30 kg ha -1 gave statistically comparable listed traits.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
sulphur @15 and 30 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
above mentioned parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“statistically parity was observed with application of sulphur @15 and 30 kg ha -1 for above mentioned parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend 30 kg ha -1 sulfur as gypsum for onion yield and keeping quality.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1 in form of gypsume0
Outcome
obtaining higher bulb yield having better keeping qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of sulphur @ 30 kg ha -1 in form of gypsum may be recommended in onion crop for obtaining higher bulb yield having better keeping quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1669 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

lime · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

lime · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.