Paper · 2018 · Bulletin of Uman National University of Horticulture

INFLUENCE OF DOSES AND RELATIONSHIP BASED ON ON YIELDAND QUALITY OF GRAIN WHEAT

H. M. Hospogarenko; V. P. Boyko; О. Y. Stasinevych; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The results of research of influence of long-term application of different doses and ratios of fertilizers on podzolized chernozem in field crop rotation in the conditions of the Right Bank Forest-steppe Ukraine on the yield and quality of winter wheat, the predecessor of which was soybean. It was determined that due to different doses, ratios and types of fertilizers it is possible to increase the yield of culture by 31–96 %. The highest quality indicators ensured the use of mineral fertilizers with a dose of N150P30K40 per 1 ha of crop rotation – 13,5 % protein and 28,4 % gluten (group A 2 of the class of quality group). With the increase of doses of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers twice the content of protein and gluten has not significantly increased. It that in areas where fertilizers were not introduced, the grain corresponded to the 6th grade, only nitric fertilizers with a dose of N150 and their application on the phosphoric-potassium background ensured the production of grain of grade 2 quality. It was established that the density of the connection due to the correlation coefficient between the weight of 1000 grains and the grain was weak (r = 0,19), but between the weight of 1000 grains and the yield – moderate (r = 0,41), between the content of protein and gluten – strong (r = 0,76). According to a generalized quality indicator, winter wheat grain of the best quality was formed in the experiment variant with the introduction of N150P60K40, and on average per 1 ha of field crop rotation – N110P60K40.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer doses and ratios increased winter wheat yield by 31–96%.

Treatment
different doses, ratios and types of fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
31–96 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“due to different doses, ratios and types of fertilizers it is possible to increase the yield of culture by 31–96 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N150P30K40 gave 13,5 % protein in winter wheat.

Treatment
N150P30K40e0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13,5 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest quality indicators ensured the use of mineral fertilizers with a dose of N150P30K40 per 1 ha of crop rotation – 13,5 % protein and 28,4 % gluten”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N150P30K40 gave 28,4 % gluten in winter wheat.

Treatment
N150P30K40e0
Outcome
glutene0
Direction
higheste0
Value
28,4 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest quality indicators ensured the use of mineral fertilizers with a dose of N150P30K40 per 1 ha of crop rotation – 13,5 % protein and 28,4 % gluten”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubling phosphorus and potassium did not significantly increase wheat protein and gluten.

Treatment
increase of doses of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers twicee0
Outcome
content of protein and glutene0
Direction
not significantly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase of doses of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers twice the content of protein and gluten has not significantly increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fertilizers were not introduced produced 6th grade wheat grain.

Treatment
fertilizers were not introducede0
Outcome
6th gradee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in areas where fertilizers were not introduced, the grain corresponded to the 6th grade, only nitric fertilizers with a dose of N150 and their application on the phosphoric-potassium background ensured the production of grain of grade 2 quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

nitric fertilizers with a dose of N150 produced grade 2 quality wheat grain.

Treatment
nitric fertilizers with a dose of N150e0
Outcome
grade 2 qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in areas where fertilizers were not introduced, the grain corresponded to the 6th grade, only nitric fertilizers with a dose of N150 and their application on the phosphoric-potassium background ensured the production of grain of grade 2 quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

their application on the phosphoric-potassium background produced grade 2 quality wheat grain.

Treatment
their application on the phosphoric-potassium backgrounde0
Outcome
grade 2 qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in areas where fertilizers were not introduced, the grain corresponded to the 6th grade, only nitric fertilizers with a dose of N150 and their application on the phosphoric-potassium background ensured the production of grain of grade 2 quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The association for weight of 1000 grains and the grain was r = 0,19.

Outcome
weight of 1000 grains and the graine0
Value
r = 0,19e0
Setting
graine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the density of the connection due to the correlation coefficient between the weight of 1000 grains and the grain was weak (r = 0,19), but between the weight of 1000 grains and the yield – moderate (r = 0,41), between the content of protein and gluten – strong (r = 0,76)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The association for weight of 1000 grains and the yield was r = 0,41.

Outcome
weight of 1000 grains and the yielde0
Value
r = 0,41e0
Setting
graine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the density of the connection due to the correlation coefficient between the weight of 1000 grains and the grain was weak (r = 0,19), but between the weight of 1000 grains and the yield – moderate (r = 0,41), between the content of protein and gluten – strong (r = 0,76)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The association for content of protein and gluten was r = 0,76.

Outcome
content of protein and glutene0
Value
r = 0,76e0
Setting
graine0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the density of the connection due to the correlation coefficient between the weight of 1000 grains and the grain was weak (r = 0,19), but between the weight of 1000 grains and the yield – moderate (r = 0,41), between the content of protein and gluten – strong (r = 0,76)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1319 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N150P60K40 gave the best wheat grain quality under its stated basis.

Treatment
N150P60K40e0
Outcome
grain of the best qualitye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain of the best quality was formed in the experiment variant with the introduction of N150P60K40, and on average per 1 ha of field crop rotation – N110P60K40”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N110P60K40 gave the best wheat grain quality under its stated basis.

Treatment
N110P60K40e0
Outcome
grain of the best qualitye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat grain of the best quality was formed in the experiment variant with the introduction of N150P60K40, and on average per 1 ha of field crop rotation – N110P60K40”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAIN WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–79 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

56 papers: 47 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 501 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.