Abstract
This research aims to evaluate the influence of silvicultural technique (combination between singling and teak pruning) and ginger fertilizing in agroforestry plants productivity. Factorial random complete block design was used as experimental design, using three factors, that are teak pruning intensity, teak singling, and ginger fertilizing. Pruning intensity were P0 (without pruning) and P1 (60% pruning intensity), singling were S0 (without singling) and S1 (singling of teak coppice), and fertilizer intensity were J0 (without fertilizer) and J1 (5 ton/Ha of compost + 525 kg/ha of NPK). The research was conducted in teak private forest in Karangduwet, Paliyan, Gunung Kidul. The applied silvicultural technique system was clear cutting with coppice/sprout regeneration. Teak trees were the result of teak coppice in 2009 (6 years old). Result showed that singling gave significant influence to teak diameter growth (1.67 cm/1.5 year), while fertilizer gave significant influence to teak diameter (1.71 cm/1.5 year) and height growth (1.16 m/1.5 year). Moreover, teak pruning and ginger fertilizing gave significant influence to the resulted ginger wet weight. In this research, best ginger production (121.53 gram/clump) was found in the application of fertilizer combined with intercropping of pruned teak.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Singling significantly influenced teak diameter growth, reported as 1.67 cm per 1.5 years.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“singling gave significant influence to teak diameter growth (1.67 cm/1.5 year)”
t0“teak”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer significantly influenced teak diameter growth, reported as 1.71 cm per 1.5 years.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“fertilizer gave significant influence to teak diameter (1.71 cm/1.5 year) and height growth (1.16 m/1.5 year)”
t0“teak”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer significantly influenced teak height growth, reported as 1.16 m per 1.5 years.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“fertilizer gave significant influence to teak diameter (1.71 cm/1.5 year) and height growth (1.16 m/1.5 year)”
t0“teak”
Claim · model-written summary
Teak pruning significantly influenced ginger wet weight.
- Taxon
- ginger
Zingiber officinalee0 - Treatment
- teak pruninge0
- Outcome
- ginger wet weighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“teak pruning and ginger fertilizing gave significant influence to the resulted ginger wet weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Ginger fertilization significantly influenced ginger wet weight.
- Taxon
- gingerZingiber officinalee0
- Treatment
- ginger fertilizinge0
- Outcome
- ginger wet weighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“teak pruning and ginger fertilizing gave significant influence to the resulted ginger wet weight”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest ginger production was 121.53 gram per clump with fertilizer and intercropping under pruned teak.
- Taxon
- gingerZingiber officinalee0
- Treatment
- application of fertilizer combined with intercropping of pruned teake0
- Outcome
- ginger productione0
- Direction
- beste0
- Value
- 121.53 gram/clumpe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“best ginger production (121.53 gram/clump) was found in the application of fertilizer combined with intercropping of pruned teak”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results differ
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →fertilization · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →pruning · yield · Zingiber officinale (ginger)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.