Paper · 1982 · Weed Science

Atrazine Efficacy and Longevity as Affected by Tillage, Liming, and Fertilizer Type

Steve W. Lowder; Jerome B. Weber

6
claims
23
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Efficacy of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino-6-(isopropylamino)- s -triazine] applied preemergence to no-tillage and conventional-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) was studied in the field for 2 yr at two locations. Other variables examined were lime treatments, atrazine rates, and acid-forming (NH 4 NO 3 ) vs. nonacid-forming (NaNO 3 ) nitrogen fertilizers. Mean surface soil pH levels during the growing season were higher with no-tillage than conventional tillage, because of the retention of lime in the surface in no-tillage vs. mixing it with the soil in conventional tillage, but there was no consistent increase in atrazine efficacy or longevity in one system over the other. Liming significantly increased atrazine efficacy and longevity in both no-tillage and conventional-tillage systems. Increased rates of atrazine increased weed control and longevity of the herbicide. Use of NaNO 3 as a nitrogen source resulted in increased atrazine efficacy and longevity as compared with use of NH 4 NO 3 during the first year, which was relatively dry, but had no effect during the second year, which was relatively wet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage had higher surface soil pH than conventional tillage.

Treatment
no-tillagee2
Outcome
surface soil pH levelse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional tillagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean surface soil pH levels during the growing season were higher with no-tillage than conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–462 · show in text ↑
e1

“Efficacy of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino-6-(isopropylamino)- s -triazine] applied preemergence to no-tillage and conventional-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) was studied in the field for 2 yr at two locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher with no-tillage than conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–462 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher with no-tillage than conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage systems showed no consistent difference in atrazine efficacy or longevity.

Treatment
no-tillagee2
Outcome
atrazine efficacy or longevitye0
Direction
no consistent increasee0
Comparator
conventional tillagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no consistent increase in atrazine efficacy or longevity in one system over the other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–678 · show in text ↑
e1

“Efficacy of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino-6-(isopropylamino)- s -triazine] applied preemergence to no-tillage and conventional-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) was studied in the field for 2 yr at two locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher with no-tillage than conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–462 · show in text ↑
e3

“higher with no-tillage than conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming significantly increased atrazine efficacy and longevity in both tillage systems.

Treatment
Liminge0
Outcome
atrazine efficacy and longevitye2
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both no-tillage and conventional-tillage systemse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Liming significantly increased atrazine efficacy and longevity in both no-tillage and conventional-tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–794 · show in text ↑
e1

“Efficacy of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino-6-(isopropylamino)- s -triazine] applied preemergence to no-tillage and conventional-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) was studied in the field for 2 yr at two locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Liming significantly increased atrazine efficacy and longevity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher atrazine rates increased weed control and herbicide longevity.

Treatment
Increased rates of atrazinee0
Outcome
weed control and longevity of the herbicidee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased rates of atrazine increased weed control and longevity of the herbicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–877 · show in text ↑
e1

“Efficacy of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino-6-(isopropylamino)- s -triazine] applied preemergence to no-tillage and conventional-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) was studied in the field for 2 yr at two locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaNO 3 increased atrazine efficacy and longevity relative to NH 4 NO 3 in the relatively dry first year.

Treatment
NaNO 3e2
Outcome
atrazine efficacy and longevitye4
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
first year, which was relatively drye0
Comparator
NH 4 NO 3e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of NaNO 3 as a nitrogen source resulted in increased atrazine efficacy and longevity as compared with use of NH 4 NO 3 during the first year, which was relatively dry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1049 · show in text ↑
e1

“Efficacy of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino-6-(isopropylamino)- s -triazine] applied preemergence to no-tillage and conventional-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) was studied in the field for 2 yr at two locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Use of NaNO 3 as a nitrogen source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–913 · show in text ↑
e3

“as compared with use of NH 4 NO 3 during the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1023 · show in text ↑
e4

“Liming significantly increased atrazine efficacy and longevity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nitrogen source had no effect in the relatively wet second year.

Treatment
NaNO 3e2
Outcome
atrazine efficacy and longevitye4
Direction
no effecte0
Qualifier
second year, which was relatively wete0
Comparator
NH 4 NO 3e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but had no effect during the second year, which was relatively wet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Efficacy of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino-6-(isopropylamino)- s -triazine] applied preemergence to no-tillage and conventional-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) was studied in the field for 2 yr at two locations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–209 · show in text ↑
e2

“Use of NaNO 3 as a nitrogen source”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–913 · show in text ↑
e3

“as compared with use of NH 4 NO 3 during the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1023 · show in text ↑
e4

“Liming significantly increased atrazine efficacy and longevity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–742 · show in text ↑

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

lime · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

tillage · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 28 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.