Paper · 2019 · HortScience

Shelf Life Quality of Plum Fruits (Prunus domestica L.) Improves with Carboxymethylcellulose-based Edible Coating

Sima Panahirad; Rahim Naghshiband-Hassani; Babak Ghanbarzadeh; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
44
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study investigated the carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)-based edible coating effects on some quality parameters and enzyme activities of plum fruits ( Prunus domestica L. cv. Golden drop) during their shelf life. Three concentrations of CMC (0.5%, 1%, and 1.5%), plasticized with glycerol (0.3% w/v), were applied to plum fruits plus a control treated with only distilled water. The results demonstrate that the CMC-based edible coating was significantly effective in maintaining firmness and titratable acidity (TA); vitamin C, anthocyanin, and flavonoid content; and the antioxidant capacity of plum fruits. Enzymatic activity was affected significantly by the coating. Peroxidase (POD) activity increased, and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and polygalacturonase (PG) decreased. In general, the formulation consisting of 1% CMC showed the best results in most of the measured parameters. Taking into account the positive effects on qualitative and biochemical characteristics of CMC-based edible coatings on plums, their application can be a potentially promising method to enhance the shelf-life of this fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CMC coating significantly maintained plum firmness and titratable acidity.

Treatment
CMC-based edible coatinge0
Outcome
firmness and titratable acidity (TA)e0
Direction
maintaininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CMC-based edible coating was significantly effective in maintaining firmness and titratable acidity (TA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plum Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CMC coating significantly maintained vitamin C, anthocyanin and flavonoid content.

Treatment
CMC-based edible coatinge0
Outcome
vitamin C, anthocyanin, and flavonoid contente0
Direction
maintaininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CMC-based edible coating was significantly effective in maintaining firmness and titratable acidity (TA); vitamin C, anthocyanin, and flavonoid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plum Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CMC coating significantly maintained antioxidant capacity.

Treatment
CMC-based edible coatinge0
Outcome
antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
maintaininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CMC-based edible coating was significantly effective in maintaining firmness and titratable acidity (TA); vitamin C, anthocyanin, and flavonoid content; and the antioxidant capacity of plum fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–610 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plum Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CMC coating increased peroxidase activity.

Treatment
Coatingt0
Outcome
Peroxidase (POD) activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peroxidase (POD) activity increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–708 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plum Fruits (Prunus domestica L.) Improves with Carboxymethylcellulose-based Edible Coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CMC coating decreased polyphenol oxidase and polygalacturonase activity.

Treatment
Coatingt0
Outcome
polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and polygalacturonase (PG)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“polyphenol oxidase (PPO) and polygalacturonase (PG) decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plum Fruits (Prunus domestica L.) Improves with Carboxymethylcellulose-based Edible Coating”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1% CMC formulation performed best for most measured parameters.

Treatment
1% CMCe0
Outcome
best results in most of the measured parameterse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the formulation consisting of 1% CMC showed the best results in most of the measured parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–885 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plum Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose CMC coatings to enhance plum shelf life.

Outcome
enhance the shelf-life of this fruite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their application can be a potentially promising method to enhance the shelf-life of this fruit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1109 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plum Fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑

storage · quality: phytochemicals · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

storage · quality: sugar starch · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.