Paper · 2019 · Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research

Sugarcane yields, juice quality and stem borer (Eldana saccharina W) infestations as influenced by increasing nitrogen rates in Ferké, Northern Ivory Coast

Crépin B. Péné; Yah Coulibaly-Ouattara

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Sugarcane is an important cash crop in Ivory Coast with a total production of about 2 million tons of cane/annum and 200,000 tons of sugar/annum. It contributes to about 1.2% of total country DGP and 3.3% of agricultural GDP. However, stem borer (Eldana saccharina W) infestations in Ferk sugarcane plantations have significantly impacted both cane and sugar yields over the last three cropping seasons with total sugar losses estimated to 5,000 tons in 2016-17. That pest damage outbreak was hypothesized to be linked to higher fertilizer rates applied to sugarcane plantations over 2014-15 and 2015-16 cropping seasons. The study aimed to determine the optimum Nfertilizer rate in sugarcane that could maintain stem borer infestations under control (BIN 5%). It was carried out on a commercial plantation of Ferk 2 sugar mill in northern Ivory Coast. That field which was cultivated with SP70-1006 variety was sprinkler irrigated with a center pivot and the experimental design was a randomized complete block with 11 N-fertilizer rates in four replications. Results obtained over two successive cropping seasons showed that, in plant cane, yield performance, cane juice quality and stem borer infestations were not significantly influenced by fertilizer treatments indicating that nitrogen was not a limiting factor in the soil profile to crop growth and development probably due to the decay of organic matter as a result of soil tillage. In contrast, in first ratoon, cane yields and stem borer infestations in terms of per cent of bored cane and bored internode percentage were significantly influenced by N-fertilizer treatments with an optimum rate of 100 to 110 kg N/ha. Cane yield increase resulting from additional N-fertilizer applications to that optimum rate was very little compared to the return cost of fertilizer with higher levels of stem borer infestations (> 8% BIN).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In plant cane, nitrogen treatments did not significantly affect yield performance.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
plant canee0
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
yield performancee0
Direction
not significantly influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in plant cane, yield performance, cane juice quality and stem borer infestations were not significantly influenced by fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In plant cane, nitrogen treatments did not significantly affect cane juice quality.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
plant canee0
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
cane juice qualitye0
Direction
not significantly influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in plant cane, yield performance, cane juice quality and stem borer infestations were not significantly influenced by fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In plant cane, nitrogen treatments did not significantly affect stem borer infestations.

Taxon
Sugarcanet1
Organ / stage
plant canee0
Treatment
fertilizer treatmentse0
Interactor
stem borert0pest
Outcome
stem borer infestationse0
Direction
not significantly influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“in plant cane, yield performance, cane juice quality and stem borer infestations were not significantly influenced by fertilizer treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1267 · show in text ↑
t0

“stem borer (Eldana saccharina W)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–68 · show in text ↑
t1

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In first ratoon cane, nitrogen treatments significantly influenced cane yields, with an optimum rate of 100 to 110 kg N/ha.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
first ratoone0
Treatment
N-fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
cane yieldse0
Value
100 to 110 kg N/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“in first ratoon, cane yields and stem borer infestations in terms of per cent of bored cane and bored internode percentage were significantly influenced by N-fertilizer treatments with an optimum rate of 100 to 110 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In first ratoon cane, nitrogen treatments significantly influenced percentages of bored cane and bored internodes.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
first ratoone0
Treatment
N-fertilizer treatmentse0
Interactor
stem borert0pest
Outcome
per cent of bored cane and bored internode percentagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“in first ratoon, cane yields and stem borer infestations in terms of per cent of bored cane and bored internode percentage were significantly influenced by N-fertilizer treatments with an optimum rate of 100 to 110 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1678 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane yields, juice quality and stem borer (Eldana saccharina W)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional nitrogen above the optimum produced little cane yield increase relative to fertilizer cost, alongside higher borer infestation.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
additional N-fertilizer applicationse0
Interactor
stem borert0pest
Outcome
Cane yield increasee0
Direction
very littlee0
Qualifier
higher levels of stem borer infestations (> 8% BIN)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Cane yield increase resulting from additional N-fertilizer applications to that optimum rate was very little compared to the return cost of fertilizer with higher levels of stem borer infestations (> 8% BIN).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1680–1888 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarcane yields, juice quality and stem borer (Eldana saccharina W)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

fertilization · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 20 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 312 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.