Paper · 2019 · Italian Journal of Agronomy

Assessing photosynthetic performance of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill) influenced by plant growth regulators and drought stress imposed at vegetative and reproductive stages

Ghasem Parmoon; Ali Ebadi; Soodabeh Jahanbakhsh; et al.

16
claims
35
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Maintaining crop productivity under limited irrigation water requires some new strategies. This study investigated the influence of drought stress and the application of plant growth regulators (PGRs) including jasmonic acid, brassinosteroids, and putrescine on photosynthetic performance of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill). The results indicated that fennel exhibited active osmoregulation which prevented a sharp decrease in relative water content. Fennel successfully maintained high leaf chlorophyll index, Net photosynthesis rate, and transpiration under mild stress, however, severe stress reduced the photosynthetic parameters by 22%, 24%, and 50%, respectively. Drought stress increased chlorophyll a fluorescence when fennel plants exposed to the stress condition. Vk and Wk parameters related to the donor side of photoinhibition of photosystem II (PSII) increased by 44% when severe drought stress imposed at the vegetative stage and 34% when occurred during the flowering. The elevation of Vk and Wk indicated a failure in water splitting in PSII. The VJ and VI parameters of acceptor sides increased by 16% and 22%, respectively when drought stress imposed at the vegetative phase and to 19% and 30%, when drought stress occurred during reproductive phase. Using PGRs resulted in reduced VJ, VI, Vk, and Wk, suggesting that some degree of recovery of damages occurred. All three PGRs stimulated biomass production and on average, plants yielded roughly 1.6 fold higher than the control plants. The influences of PGRs were mainly independent of drought stress level.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fennel osmoregulation prevented a sharp fall in relative water content.

Outcome
relative water contente0
Qualifier
active osmoregulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fennel exhibited active osmoregulation which prevented a sharp decrease in relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fennel maintained high chlorophyll index, photosynthesis and transpiration under mild stress.

Outcome
leaf chlorophyll index, Net photosynthesis rate, and transpiratione0
Qualifier
mild stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fennel successfully maintained high leaf chlorophyll index, Net photosynthesis rate, and transpiration under mild stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe stress reduced leaf chlorophyll index by 22%.

Treatment
severe stresse0
Outcome
leaf chlorophyll indext1
Direction
reducede0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severe stress reduced the photosynthetic parameters by 22%, 24%, and 50%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
t1

“leaf chlorophyll index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe stress reduced net photosynthesis by 24%.

Treatment
severe stresse0
Outcome
Net photosynthesis ratet1
Direction
reducede0
Value
24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severe stress reduced the photosynthetic parameters by 22%, 24%, and 50%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
t1

“Net photosynthesis rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe stress reduced transpiration by 50%.

Treatment
severe stresse0
Outcome
transpirationt1
Direction
reducede0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severe stress reduced the photosynthetic parameters by 22%, 24%, and 50%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
t1

“transpiration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–554 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased chlorophyll a fluorescence.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll a fluorescencee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress increased chlorophyll a fluorescence when fennel plants exposed to the stress condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe vegetative stage drought increased Vk and Wk by 44%.

Organ / stage
vegetative stagee0
Treatment
severe drought stresse0
Outcome
Vk and Wk parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
44%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vk and Wk parameters related to the donor side of photoinhibition of photosystem II (PSII) increased by 44% when severe drought stress imposed at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe flowering stage drought increased Vk and Wk by 34%.

Organ / stage
floweringe0
Treatment
severe drought stresst1
Outcome
Vk and Wkt1
Direction
increasedt1
Value
34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“34% when occurred during the flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
t1

“Vk and Wk parameters related to the donor side of photoinhibition of photosystem II (PSII) increased by 44% when severe drought stress imposed at the vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–941 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated Vk and Wk indicated failure of water splitting in PSII.

Outcome
failure in water splitting in PSIIe0
Qualifier
elevation of Vk and Wke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The elevation of Vk and Wk indicated a failure in water splitting in PSII”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative drought increased VJ by 16%.

Organ / stage
vegetative phasee0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
VJe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“VJ and VI parameters of acceptor sides increased by 16% and 22%, respectively when drought stress imposed at the vegetative phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative drought increased VI by 22%.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
VIe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“VJ and VI parameters of acceptor sides increased by 16% and 22%, respectively when drought stress imposed at the vegetative phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1194 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reproductive drought increased VJ by 19%.

Organ / stage
reproductive phasee0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
VJt1
Direction
increasedt1
Value
19%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to 19% and 30%, when drought stress occurred during reproductive phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
t1

“VJ and VI parameters of acceptor sides increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reproductive drought increased VI by 30%.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
VIt1
Direction
increasedt1
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to 19% and 30%, when drought stress occurred during reproductive phase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
t1

“VJ and VI parameters of acceptor sides increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGRs reduced VJ, VI, Vk and Wk.

Treatment
PGRse0
Outcome
VJ, VI, Vk, and Wke0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using PGRs resulted in reduced VJ, VI, Vk, and Wk”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three PGRs stimulated biomass production to about 1.6 fold control.

Treatment
All three PGRse0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
1.6 folde0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All three PGRs stimulated biomass production and on average, plants yielded roughly 1.6 fold higher than the control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1506 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR effects were mainly independent of drought level.

Treatment
drought stress levele0
Outcome
influences of PGRse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anethum foeniculum
Anethum foeniculum · TaxonRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The influences of PGRs were mainly independent of drought stress level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1578 · show in text ↑
t0

“fennel”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Anethum foeniculum (fennel)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

class · yield · Anethum foeniculum (fennel)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.