Paper · 2019 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Herbicides for weed management in dry direct-seeded rice

N.V. Kashid; V.T. Jadhav; Y.J. Patil

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the Kharif season of 2015 to 2017 for three years at Agricultural Research Station, Vadgaon Maval, Pune, Maharashtra to find out the efficacy of different weed control methods on dry direct-seeded rice and its economics. Pretilachlor 0.450 kg/ha as pre-emergence application (PE) at 2–3 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) azimsulfuron 0.035 kg/ha as post-emergence application (PoE) at 25 DAS effectively managed weeds in dry-DSR and gave the higher grain yield (5.62 t/ha), net returns (’ 82777/ha), higher B:C ratio (2.8) with lower weed index (2.78) and higher weed control efficiency (87.7%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential pretilachlor and azimsulfuron effectively managed weeds in dry direct-seeded rice.

Treatment
Pretilachlor 0.450 kg/ha as pre-emergence application (PE) at 2–3 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) azimsulfuron 0.035 kg/ha as post-emergence application (PoE) at 25 DASe0
Outcome
weedse0
Direction
effectively managede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pretilachlor 0.450 kg/ha as pre-emergence application (PE) at 2–3 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) azimsulfuron 0.035 kg/ha as post-emergence application (PoE) at 25 DAS effectively managed weeds in dry-DSR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–475 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequential herbicides gave higher grain yield of 5.62 t/ha.

Treatment
Pretilachlor 0.450 kg/ha as pre-emergence application (PE) at 2–3 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) azimsulfuron 0.035 kg/ha as post-emergence application (PoE) at 25 DASe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.62 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pretilachlor 0.450 kg/ha as pre-emergence application (PE) at 2–3 days after sowing (DAS) followed by (fb) azimsulfuron 0.035 kg/ha as post-emergence application (PoE) at 25 DAS effectively managed weeds in dry-DSR and gave the higher grain yield (5.62 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequential herbicides gave net returns of ’ 82777/ha.

Outcome
net returnse0
Value
’ 82777/hae0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net returns (’ 82777/ha), higher B:C ratio (2.8) with lower weed index (2.78) and higher weed control efficiency (87.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequential herbicides gave a higher B:C ratio of 2.8.

Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.8e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher B:C ratio (2.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequential herbicides gave a lower weed index of 2.78.

Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
2.78e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower weed index (2.78)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sequential herbicides gave higher weed control efficiency of 87.7%.

Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
87.7%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher weed control efficiency (87.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–56 · show in text ↑

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Pretilachlor · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

150 papers: 147 positive, 3 negative or no effect

146 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

azimsulfuron · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 35 positive, 5 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

azimsulfuron · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

33 papers: 33 positive, 0 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

599 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.