Paper · 2019 · Agriculture

Impact of Microwave Soil Heating on the Yield and Nutritive Value of Rice Crop

Muhammad Jamal Khan; Graham Brodie; Long Cheng; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Microwave (MW) soil heating has been shown to deplete the soil weed seedbank and increase crop productivity. However, the impact of MW soil heating on the nutritive value of crops is unknown. In this study, two field trials were conducted to evaluate the effect of pre-sowing MW soil treatment with a duration of 60 s and an untreated control, which were assigned in a randomized complete block design with five replicates at two locations, on the yield and nitrogen (N) accumulation pattern of rice crops. At Jerilderie site, soil heating at up to 70–75 °C significantly (p ˂ 0.09) increased the rice biomass yield by 43.03% compared with rice biomass yield in untreated soils, while at Dookie site no significant increase in biomass yield was detected. Dry matter digestibility (DMD), ash, and N% did not change, whereas the N accumulation in dry biomass was significantly (p ˂ 0.09) higher at both sites (8.2% at Dookie and 43.4% at Jerilderie) and N use efficiency (10–40%) increased in response to MW soil treatment. The current study suggests that MW soil treatment can potentially enhance the crop productivity and N accumulation in dry biomass under field conditions. Future research is needed to understand the impact of MW soil heating on the productivity and nutritive value of different fodder crops under field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave soil heating increased rice biomass yield 43.03% at Jerilderie.

Treatment
soil heating at up to 70–75 °Ce0
Outcome
rice biomass yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
43.03%e0
Comparator
untreated soilse0
Setting
Jerilderie sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Jerilderie site, soil heating at up to 70–75 °C significantly (p ˂ 0.09) increased the rice biomass yield by 43.03% compared with rice biomass yield in untreated soils, while at Dookie site no significant increase in biomass yield was detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant rice biomass increase was detected at Dookie.

Treatment
soil heatinge0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
no significant increasee0
Comparator
untreated soilse0
Setting
Dookie sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Jerilderie site, soil heating at up to 70–75 °C significantly (p ˂ 0.09) increased the rice biomass yield by 43.03% compared with rice biomass yield in untreated soils, while at Dookie site no significant increase in biomass yield was detected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter digestibility, ash, and nitrogen percentage did not change.

Treatment
MW soil treatmente0
Outcome
Dry matter digestibility (DMD), ash, and N%e0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter digestibility (DMD), ash, and N% did not change, whereas the N accumulation in dry biomass was significantly (p ˂ 0.09) higher at both sites (8.2% at Dookie and 43.4% at Jerilderie) and N use efficiency (10–40%) increased in response to MW soil treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice dry biomass nitrogen accumulation was 8.2% higher at Dookie.

Treatment
MW soil treatmente0
Outcome
N accumulation in dry biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
8.2%e0
Setting
Dookiee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter digestibility (DMD), ash, and N% did not change, whereas the N accumulation in dry biomass was significantly (p ˂ 0.09) higher at both sites (8.2% at Dookie and 43.4% at Jerilderie) and N use efficiency (10–40%) increased in response to MW soil treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice dry biomass nitrogen accumulation was 43.4% higher at Jerilderie.

Treatment
MW soil treatmente0
Outcome
N accumulation in dry biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
43.4%e0
Setting
Jerilderiee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter digestibility (DMD), ash, and N% did not change, whereas the N accumulation in dry biomass was significantly (p ˂ 0.09) higher at both sites (8.2% at Dookie and 43.4% at Jerilderie) and N use efficiency (10–40%) increased in response to MW soil treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice nitrogen use efficiency increased by 10–40% under microwave treatment.

Treatment
MW soil treatmente0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10–40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N use efficiency (10–40%) increased in response to MW soil treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

processing · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 31 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

processing · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

88 papers: 56 positive, 32 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

heat · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 36 positive, 159 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 159 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.