Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Production

Studies the Effect of Alternative Dormancy Breaking Agents on “Le-Cont” Pear Cultivar

M. Makarem; Nevine Taha; Naglaa Shakweer

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study was carried out during two successive seasons of 2013 and 2014, to investigate the effect of alternative dormancy breaking agents on bud break, growth, yield and fruit characteristics of “Le-Cont” pear cultivar. The following treatments were investigated at the dormant bud stage; 2% Garlic extract (GE) + 4% Summer oil; 4% GE + 4% (summer oil); 2% hydrogen cyanamide (H2CN2) + 4% (summer oil); 4% H2CN2 + 4% (summer oil); 2 % urea phosphite (CO(NH2)2.H3PO3) + 4% (summer oil); 4 % (urea phosphite) + 4% (summer oil); 4% Summer oil alone. The effects of all treatments were compared with the control (untreated trees). It is noticed that the beginning of flowering to all treatments resulted in early flowering and shorter than the control. All treatments increased both bud burst percentage and floral bud percentage; especially garlic extracts at the highest concentration. Garlic extract and urea phosphite concentration gave the highest number of fruits/tree and yield kg/tree also fruit weight, size and their dimensions have been affected. Hydrogen cyanamide 4 % and urea phosphite 2 % gave the softener fruits. In addition, all treatments was affected to increase TSS, total and reducing sugars than control treatment. Hormonal changes during the rest period in flower buds of Le-Conte pear were determined in the 2nd season of the study. The highest levels of IAA and GA3 contents were found to be in endo-dormancy (on the end of Feb.), while Abscisic acid showed the highest values during the 1st deep dormancy (on the end of Dec.). It was a remarkable increases in IAA and GA3 occurred at bud swelling stage. Meanwhile, the lowest level of ABA was observed at the same stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments advanced and shortened flowering versus control.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
beginning of floweringe0
Direction
earlye0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

““Le-Cont” Pear Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“the beginning of flowering to all treatments resulted in early flowering and shorter than the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments increased bud burst and floral bud percentages, especially concentrated garlic extract.

Treatment
All treatmentse0
Outcome
bud burst percentage and floral bud percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control (untreated trees)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

““Le-Cont” Pear Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“All treatments increased both bud burst percentage and floral bud percentage; especially garlic extracts at the highest concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effects of all treatments were compared with the control (untreated trees).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract and urea phosphite gave the highest fruits per tree and yield.

Treatment
Garlic extract and urea phosphite concentratione0
Outcome
number of fruits/tree and yield kg/treee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

““Le-Cont” Pear Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Garlic extract and urea phosphite concentration gave the highest number of fruits/tree and yield kg/tree also fruit weight, size and their dimensions have been affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract and urea phosphite affected fruit weight, size and dimensions.

Treatment
Garlic extract and urea phosphite concentratione0
Outcome
fruit weight, size and their dimensionse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

““Le-Cont” Pear Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Garlic extract and urea phosphite concentration gave the highest number of fruits/tree and yield kg/tree also fruit weight, size and their dimensions have been affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogen cyanamide 4 % produced the softest fruit.

Treatment
Hydrogen cyanamide 4 %e0
Outcome
softener fruitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

““Le-Cont” Pear Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hydrogen cyanamide 4 % and urea phosphite 2 % gave the softener fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea phosphite 2 % produced softer fruit.

Treatment
urea phosphite 2 %e0
Outcome
softener fruitse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

““Le-Cont” Pear Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hydrogen cyanamide 4 % and urea phosphite 2 % gave the softener fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments increased TSS and total and reducing sugars versus control.

Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
TSS, total and reducing sugarse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

““Le-Cont” Pear Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“all treatments was affected to increase TSS, total and reducing sugars than control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1236 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA and GA3 were highest at endo-dormancy.

Organ / stage
endo-dormancye0
Outcome
IAA and GA3 contentse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest levels of IAA and GA3 contents were found to be in endo-dormancy (on the end of Feb.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1454 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abscisic acid peaked during first deep dormancy.

Organ / stage
1st deep dormancye0
Outcome
Abscisic acide0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

““Le-Cont” Pear Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“Abscisic acid showed the highest values during the 1st deep dormancy (on the end of Dec.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1462–1552 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA and GA3 rose at bud swelling.

Organ / stage
bud swelling stagee0
Outcome
IAA and GA3e0
Direction
increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

““Le-Cont” Pear Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“It was a remarkable increases in IAA and GA3 occurred at bud swelling stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1629 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ABA was lowest at bud swelling.

Organ / stage
bud swelling stagee1
Outcome
ABAe0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

““Le-Cont” Pear Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–85 · show in text ↑
e0

“the lowest level of ABA was observed at the same stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1696 · show in text ↑
e1

“bud swelling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1628 · show in text ↑

Allium sativum · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

botanical · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.