Paper · 2019 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Better Together: Water Treatment Residual and Poor‐Quality Compost Improves Sandy Soil Fertility

Catherine E. Clarke; Wendy Stone; Ailsa G. Hardie; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Water treatment residual (WTR) is an underused clean water industry byproduct, generally disposed to landfill. This study assesses the benefits and risks of ferric‐WTR as a soil amendment or co‐amendment for plant growth in a nutrient‐poor sandy soil. A 12‐wk pot trial tested the efficacy of WTR and a locally available, low‐quality, municipal compost as single (1, 5, and 12.5% dry mass) and co‐amended treatments (1:1 WTR/compost ratio, at 2, 10, and 25%) on wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) growth in a sandy soil. The low total N content of the compost and low WTR P and K contents resulted in significantly lower (up to 50% lower, p < 0.05) plant biomass in single amendments compared with the control, whereas the highest co‐amendment produced significantly higher plant biomass (33% higher, p < 0.05) than the control. This positive co‐amendment effect on plant growth is attributed to balanced nutrient provision, with P and K from the compost and N from the WTR. Foliar micronutrient and Al levels showed no toxic accumulation, and co‐amended foliar Mn levels increased from near deficient (20 mg kg −1 ) to sufficient (50 mg kg −1 ). Total WTR metals were well below maximum land application concentrations (USDA). Trace element bioavailability remained the same (Ni, Cu, and Hg) or significantly decreased (B, Al, Cr, Mn, Fe, Zn, As, and Cd; p < 0.05) during the pot trial. These results suggest, within this context, that a WTR–compost co‐amendment is a promising soil improvement technology for increasing crop yields in sandy soils. Core Ideas Iron (Fe) water treatment residual (WTR) is a byproduct of potable water production. Wheat biomass increased by 33% when poor‐quality compost and Fe‐WTR were combined. Combined amendments and control outperformed single amendments of compost and WTR. Bioavailable metals measured after the pot trial did not increase. Co‐application of compost with WTR may counter the negative effects of P sorption.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single compost or WTR amendments reduced wheat biomass up to 50% versus control.

Treatment
single amendmentse0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
50%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly lower (up to 50% lower, p < 0.05) plant biomass in single amendments compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest co-amendment increased wheat biomass by 33% versus control.

Treatment
highest co‐amendmente0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
33%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest co‐amendment produced significantly higher plant biomass (33% higher, p < 0.05) than the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–822 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–498 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed the co-amendment growth effect to balanced nutrient provision.

Outcome
plant growthe0
Qualifier
balanced nutrient provisione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This positive co‐amendment effect on plant growth is attributed to balanced nutrient provision, with P and K from the compost and N from the WTR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–968 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–498 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar micronutrient and aluminium levels showed no toxic accumulation.

Organ / stage
Foliare0
Outcome
no toxic accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar micronutrient and Al levels showed no toxic accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1033 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-amendment increased foliar Mn from 20 to 50 mg kg −1.

Treatment
co‐amendede0
Outcome
foliar Mn levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
50 mg kg −1e0
Qualifier
20 mg kg −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“co‐amended foliar Mn levels increased from near deficient (20 mg kg −1 ) to sufficient (50 mg kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1140 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–498 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WTR total metals were below USDA land application limits.

Outcome
Total WTR metalse0
Direction
belowe0
Comparator
maximum land application concentrations (USDA)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total WTR metals were well below maximum land application concentrations (USDA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1221 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–498 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ni, Cu and Hg bioavailability remained the same during the pot trial.

Outcome
Trace element bioavailabilitye0
Direction
remained the samee0
Qualifier
Ni, Cu, and Hge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trace element bioavailability remained the same (Ni, Cu, and Hg) or significantly decreased (B, Al, Cr, Mn, Fe, Zn, As, and Cd; p < 0.05) during the pot trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1381 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–498 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B, Al, Cr, Mn, Fe, Zn, As and Cd bioavailability significantly decreased during the pot trial.

Outcome
Trace element bioavailabilitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
B, Al, Cr, Mn, Fe, Zn, As, and Cde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trace element bioavailability remained the same (Ni, Cu, and Hg) or significantly decreased (B, Al, Cr, Mn, Fe, Zn, As, and Cd; p < 0.05) during the pot trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1381 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–498 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend WTR-compost co-amendment to improve sandy soil for crop yield.

Outcome
WTR–compost co‐amendment is a promising soil improvement technology for increasing crop yields in sandy soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a WTR–compost co‐amendment is a promising soil improvement technology for increasing crop yields in sandy soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1543 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–498 · show in text ↑

other · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 100 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.