Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of preharvest plant 28.6% chitosan composite film (CTS-Fh) sprays on the postharvest quality and diseases in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv. 'Guichang'), it was screened and prepared by mixing chitosan, calcium, dextrin, ferulic acid and auxiliaries. 28.6% CTS-Fh solutions at different concentrations were sprayed three times during the fruit growing season. The obtained results show that 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays remarkably promoted the improvement of the yield and quality of the kiwifruit, significantly (P < 0.05) increased the Ca content and firmness, delayed the fruit ripening and softening, and enhanced the storability. Moreover, the kiwifruit soft rot was effectively controlled; the control efficiency was 61.68-88.79%. Additionally, the 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays significantly (P < 0.05) increased the content and activity of some defence-related secondary metabolites and enzymes, and could also increase the cell wall compactness in the kiwifruit. These results suggest that 28.6% CTS-Fh might trigger several defence responses in the kiwifruit against pathogenic infections. The doses of 28.6% CTS-Fh 200-400 dilution times were recommended for the practical application with regards to the production of kiwifruit.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
CTS-Fh sprays improvement kiwifruit yield.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fh sprayse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The obtained results show that 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays remarkably promoted the improvement of the yield and quality of the kiwifruit, significantly (P < 0.05) increased the Ca content and firmness, delayed the fruit ripening and softening, and enhanced the storability.”
Claim · model-written summary
CTS-Fh sprays improvement kiwifruit quality.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fh sprayse0
- Outcome
- qualitye0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The obtained results show that 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays remarkably promoted the improvement of the yield and quality of the kiwifruit, significantly (P < 0.05) increased the Ca content and firmness, delayed the fruit ripening and softening, and enhanced the storability.”
Claim · model-written summary
CTS-Fh sprays increased kiwifruit Ca content.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fh sprayse0
- Outcome
- Ca contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The obtained results show that 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays remarkably promoted the improvement of the yield and quality of the kiwifruit, significantly (P < 0.05) increased the Ca content and firmness, delayed the fruit ripening and softening, and enhanced the storability.”
Claim · model-written summary
CTS-Fh sprays increased kiwifruit firmness.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fh sprayse0
- Outcome
- firmnesse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The obtained results show that 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays remarkably promoted the improvement of the yield and quality of the kiwifruit, significantly (P < 0.05) increased the Ca content and firmness, delayed the fruit ripening and softening, and enhanced the storability.”
Claim · model-written summary
CTS-Fh sprays delayed kiwifruit fruit ripening.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fh sprayse0
- Outcome
- fruit ripeninge0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The obtained results show that 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays remarkably promoted the improvement of the yield and quality of the kiwifruit, significantly (P < 0.05) increased the Ca content and firmness, delayed the fruit ripening and softening, and enhanced the storability.”
Claim · model-written summary
CTS-Fh sprays delayed kiwifruit softening.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fh sprayse0
- Outcome
- softeninge0
- Direction
- delayede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The obtained results show that 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays remarkably promoted the improvement of the yield and quality of the kiwifruit, significantly (P < 0.05) increased the Ca content and firmness, delayed the fruit ripening and softening, and enhanced the storability.”
Claim · model-written summary
CTS-Fh sprays enhanced kiwifruit storability.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fh sprayse0
- Outcome
- storabilitye0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The obtained results show that 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays remarkably promoted the improvement of the yield and quality of the kiwifruit, significantly (P < 0.05) increased the Ca content and firmness, delayed the fruit ripening and softening, and enhanced the storability.”
Claim · model-written summary
Kiwifruit soft rot was controlled with 61.68-88.79% efficiency.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Outcome
- kiwifruit soft rote0
- Direction
- effectively controllede0
- Value
- 61.68-88.79%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Moreover, the kiwifruit soft rot was effectively controlled; the control efficiency was 61.68-88.79%.”
Claim · model-written summary
CTS-Fh increased defence related metabolite and enzyme content.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fh sprayse0
- Outcome
- contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Additionally, the 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays significantly (P < 0.05) increased the content and activity of some defence-related secondary metabolites and enzymes, and could also increase the cell wall compactness in the kiwifruit.”
Claim · model-written summary
CTS-Fh increased defence related metabolite and enzyme activity.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fh sprayse0
- Outcome
- activitye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Additionally, the 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays significantly (P < 0.05) increased the content and activity of some defence-related secondary metabolites and enzymes, and could also increase the cell wall compactness in the kiwifruit.”
Claim · model-written summary
CTS-Fh could increase kiwifruit cell wall compactness.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fh sprayse0
- Outcome
- cell wall compactnesse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Additionally, the 28.6% CTS-Fh sprays significantly (P < 0.05) increased the content and activity of some defence-related secondary metabolites and enzymes, and could also increase the cell wall compactness in the kiwifruit.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest CTS-Fh may trigger defence responses against infection.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fhe0
- Outcome
- defence responsese0
- Qualifier
- against pathogenic infectionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“These results suggest that 28.6% CTS-Fh might trigger several defence responses in the kiwifruit against pathogenic infections.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 200-400 dilutions of CTS-Fh for kiwifruit production.
- Taxon
- kiwifruit
Actinidia deliciosae0 - Treatment
- 28.6% CTS-Fh 200-400 dilution timese0
- Outcome
- recommended for the practical applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The doses of 28.6% CTS-Fh 200-400 dilution times were recommended for the practical application with regards to the production of kiwifruit.”
The same questions in other papers
application · nutrient: content · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →application · quality: general · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →application · molecular: metabolites · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →application · quality: postharvest · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →application · yield · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.