Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Influence of soil temperature and moisture on micronutrient supply, plant uptake, and biomass yield of wheat, pea, and canola

Md. Noabur Rahman; Ryan Hangs; Jeff Schoenau

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop yield response to micronutrient fertilization is difficult to predict, particularly under unfavorable environmental conditions as these may alter both crop nutrient demand and the soil micronutrient supply to plant roots. The research objective was to evaluate the effect of various soil temperature and moisture conditions on crop growth response to added micronutrient copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and boron (B) along with soil micronutrient supply and distribution among fractions. Brown and Dark Brown farm soils collected from southern Saskatchewan were used to grown wheat, pea and canola within controlled environment chambers. The biomass yields of all crops decreased under cold soil temperature and moisture stress (drought and saturated) conditions. Greater plant uptake of Cu, Zn, and B was associated with optimum (i.e., field capacity) soil moisture and warm temperature (23°C) growing conditions, compared to drought (i.e., 50% field capacity), saturated, and cold (5°C) temperature conditions. Environmental stress had the greatest impact on pea growth, reducing crop yield and micronutrient utilization efficiency more than 95%. Soil supplies of Cu and Zn were most negatively impacted by drought stress due to reduced mobility of these diffusion limited nutrients. The extractable micronutrients levels and chemical speciation fractions of Cu, Zn, and B indicating that bioavailability and micronutrient transformation were not affected during our short-term (i.e., six-weeks) study. However, it is suggested that assessments of micronutrient forms also be conducted on soil samples under actual moisture and temperature conditions as they exist in the experiment, as well as on dried, processed samples.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

wheat biomass yield fell under cold soil temperature and moisture stress.

Treatment
cold soil temperature and moisture stress (drought and saturated) conditionse0
Outcome
biomass yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass yields of all crops decreased under cold soil temperature and moisture stress (drought and saturated) conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pea biomass yield fell under cold soil temperature and moisture stress.

Treatment
cold soil temperature and moisture stress (drought and saturated) conditionse0
Outcome
biomass yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass yields of all crops decreased under cold soil temperature and moisture stress (drought and saturated) conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

canola biomass yield fell under cold soil temperature and moisture stress.

Treatment
cold soil temperature and moisture stress (drought and saturated) conditionse0
Outcome
biomass yieldse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass yields of all crops decreased under cold soil temperature and moisture stress (drought and saturated) conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–760 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

wheat had greater micronutrient uptake with field-capacity moisture and 23°C than under stress conditions.

Outcome
plant uptake of Cu, Zn, and Be0
Direction
Greatere0
Comparator
drought (i.e., 50% field capacity), saturated, and cold (5°C) temperature conditionse0
Setting
optimum (i.e., field capacity) soil moisture and warm temperature (23°C) growing conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater plant uptake of Cu, Zn, and B was associated with optimum (i.e., field capacity) soil moisture and warm temperature (23°C) growing conditions, compared to drought (i.e., 50% field capacity), saturated, and cold (5°C) temperature conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

pea had greater micronutrient uptake with field-capacity moisture and 23°C than under stress conditions.

Outcome
plant uptake of Cu, Zn, and Be0
Direction
Greatere0
Comparator
drought (i.e., 50% field capacity), saturated, and cold (5°C) temperature conditionse0
Setting
optimum (i.e., field capacity) soil moisture and warm temperature (23°C) growing conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater plant uptake of Cu, Zn, and B was associated with optimum (i.e., field capacity) soil moisture and warm temperature (23°C) growing conditions, compared to drought (i.e., 50% field capacity), saturated, and cold (5°C) temperature conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–113 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

canola had greater micronutrient uptake with field-capacity moisture and 23°C than under stress conditions.

Outcome
plant uptake of Cu, Zn, and Be0
Direction
Greatere0
Comparator
drought (i.e., 50% field capacity), saturated, and cold (5°C) temperature conditionse0
Setting
optimum (i.e., field capacity) soil moisture and warm temperature (23°C) growing conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Greater plant uptake of Cu, Zn, and B was associated with optimum (i.e., field capacity) soil moisture and warm temperature (23°C) growing conditions, compared to drought (i.e., 50% field capacity), saturated, and cold (5°C) temperature conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental stress reduced pea crop yield by more than 95%.

Treatment
Environmental stresse0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
more than 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Environmental stress had the greatest impact on pea growth, reducing crop yield and micronutrient utilization efficiency more than 95%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Environmental stress reduced pea micronutrient utilization efficiency by more than 95%.

Treatment
Environmental stresse0
Outcome
micronutrient utilization efficiencye0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
more than 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Environmental stress had the greatest impact on pea growth, reducing crop yield and micronutrient utilization efficiency more than 95%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought most negatively affected soil Cu and Zn supplies through reduced nutrient mobility.

Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Soil supplies of Cu and Zne0
Direction
most negatively impactede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Soil supplies of Cu and Zn were most negatively impacted by drought stress due to reduced mobility of these diffusion limited nutrients.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1282 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient bioavailability and transformation were unaffected over the six-week study.

Outcome
bioavailability and micronutrient transformatione0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
short-term (i.e., six-weeks) studye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The extractable micronutrients levels and chemical speciation fractions of Cu, Zn, and B indicating that bioavailability and micronutrient transformation were not affected during our short-term (i.e., six-weeks) study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1501 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend assessing soil micronutrient forms under actual experimental conditions and in dried samples.

Outcome
assessments of micronutrient forms also be conducted on soil samples under actual moisture and temperature conditions as they exist in the experiment, as well as on dried, processed samplese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“it is suggested that assessments of micronutrient forms also be conducted on soil samples under actual moisture and temperature conditions as they exist in the experiment, as well as on dried, processed samples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1722 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

24 papers: 7 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

cold · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 21 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

cold · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cold · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

climate site · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

drought · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 4 positive, 51 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

climate site · molecular: metabolites · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.