Paper · 2019 · Sabanci University

Studying differences in soil and foliar uptake and seed deposition of zinc in HarvestPlus-biofortified wheat genotypes grown in greenhouse conditions

Raheela Rehman; Levent Öztürk; İsmail Çakmak

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

More than two billion people around the globe are suffering from malnutrition syndrome specially Zn deficiency. Women and children in developing countries are affected the most and the main reason is reliance on cereal based food to meet daily energy requirement. Wheat being the primary staple food in South Asia (Northern India and Pakistan) is important part of almost every meal and in every house. More than 26% of the population living in region consuming wheat as staple food is diagnosed as Zn deficient. Wheat, like other cereals (maize and rice) are inherently low in micronutrients, therefore, cereal-based foods do not provide enough Zn to meet the individual’s daily Zn requirement. Agriculture strategies offer a practical and cost-effective solution to the problem by increasing the Zn concentration in staple food like cereal crops through breeding (genetic biofortification) or fertilization (agronomic biofortification) or combining both approaches. Agronomic biofortification provides an instant solution to the problem by applying Zn fertilizer to the soil and/or to plant as a foliar spray. As an international group, HarvestPlus program along with collaboration of public and private partners has taken initiatives to develop the biofortified high Zn wheat cultivars along with desired agronomic traits. Current study aimed to evaluate the performance of the high Zn biofortified wheat genotypes developed through long-term breeding activities under the HarvestPlus program in Pakistan and India. Ten advanced breeding lines and two mega varieties as check were tested under four fertilizer treatments i) Deficient Soil Zn (or control) ii) Foliar Zn application iii) Soil Zn application iv) both soil and foliar Zn. The results indicate that biofortified lines have higher capacity to absorb and accumulate Zn in grain from soil and foliar Zn fertilizer as compared to check cultivars. A positive correlation was observed in grain yield and grain Zn concentration of biofortified lines. As an average of all biofortified genotypes, 18 % increase in yield and 3.5 folds increase in grain Zn concentration were recorded with the application of both soil and foliar fertilizers. Highest grain yield and grain Zn concentration was observed in an Indian biofortified genotype with both Soil + Foliar Zn application. In south Asian countries like India and Pakistan where soils are calcareous and Zn deficient, the strategy of growing genetically biofortified wheat cultivars with an added application of Zn in soil and foliar form is the best approach to improve yield and grain Zn accumulation. Under such a scenario, the targets for biofortification will be rapidly achieved by combining agronomic and genetic strategies and hence to overcome the malnutrition problem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofortified wheat lines absorbed and accumulated more grain zinc from soil and foliar fertilizer than check cultivars.

Material
biofortified linese0
Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
soil and foliar Zn fertilizere0
Outcome
absorb and accumulate Zn in graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
check cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biofortified lines have higher capacity to absorb and accumulate Zn in grain from soil and foliar Zn fertilizer as compared to check cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1906 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield and grain zinc concentration of biofortified lines were positively correlated.

Material
biofortified linese0
Outcome
grain yield and grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive correlation was observed in grain yield and grain Zn concentration of biofortified lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1908–2008 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar fertilizer raised average yield of biofortified genotypes by 18 %.

Material
biofortified genotypese0
Treatment
application of both soil and foliar fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
18 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As an average of all biofortified genotypes, 18 % increase in yield and 3.5 folds increase in grain Zn concentration were recorded with the application of both soil and foliar fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2009–2197 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined soil and foliar fertilizer raised average grain zinc concentration of biofortified genotypes 3.5 fold.

Material
biofortified genotypese0
Treatment
application of both soil and foliar fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.5 foldse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As an average of all biofortified genotypes, 18 % increase in yield and 3.5 folds increase in grain Zn concentration were recorded with the application of both soil and foliar fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2009–2197 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An Indian biofortified genotype had the highest grain yield with combined soil and foliar zinc.

Material
Indian biofortified genotypee0
Treatment
both Soil + Foliar Zn applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield and grain Zn concentration was observed in an Indian biofortified genotype with both Soil + Foliar Zn application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2198–2332 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An Indian biofortified genotype had the highest grain zinc concentration with combined soil and foliar zinc.

Material
Indian biofortified genotypee0
Treatment
both Soil + Foliar Zn applicatione0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield and grain Zn concentration was observed in an Indian biofortified genotype with both Soil + Foliar Zn application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2198–2332 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend growing biofortified wheat cultivars with soil and foliar zinc in India and Pakistan to improve yield and grain zinc.

Outcome
best approach to improve yield and grain Zn accumulatione0
Qualifier
soils are calcareous and Zn deficiente0
Setting
India and Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In south Asian countries like India and Pakistan where soils are calcareous and Zn deficient, the strategy of growing genetically biofortified wheat cultivars with an added application of Zn in soil and foliar form is the best approach to improve yield and grain Zn accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2333–2612 · show in text ↑

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.