Paper · 2020 · Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research

EVALUATION OF SEX PHERMONE AND CHLORANTRANILLIPROLE (Coragen 20% SC)R AGAINST THE TOMATO LEAFMINER, Tuta absoluta (Myrick) ON TOMATO CROP

Hamdy Mohammed; R. Shreif; A. Abd-Allah; et al.

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Population density and percent reduction of Tuta absoluta (Myrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelichiidae) males in an open tomato fields (Lycopersicon esculentum,Var. Bito 186) by using sex phermone {tuta 100 N (3mg/capsule)} and chlorantraniliprole (coragen) were evaluated during growing seasons 2015 and 2016 at Abo-kabir District, Sharkia Governorate Egypt. Six plots were treated as followes: chlorantraniliprole alone; 2 phermone traps; 2 phermone traps + chlorantraniliprale; 4 phermone traps; 4 phermone traps + chlorantraniliprole in addition to check control plot. Results showed significant reduction of infestations in all plots during two seasons when plots treated with 4 traps + spraying with chlorantraniliprole than using 2 phermone traps spraying with chlorantraniliprole or plots treated with chlorantraniliprole alone. The efficiency in reducing larve numbers were 92.26, 90.53, 84.41, 66.50 and 63.97% during season 2015, while values were 93.50,90.68, 84.75, 70.92 and 64.24% in 2016 season in plots treated with 4 phermone traps + chloranthaniliprole, 2 phermone traps +, 4 phermone traps, and 2 phermone traps, respectively. When comparing the efficacy of traps numbers, results showed that using 4 traps was better than two traps/ faddan in catching males which recorded 261.00 and 204.40 males/traps/week and 250.30 and 201.10 males/traps/week during 2015 and 2016 seasons, respectively. For the total yield per faddan, experiments showed that using 4 traps + spraying with chlorantraniliprole was the best treatment than using 2 traps + spraying with during 2015 and 2016 seasons chlorantraniliprole which recorded 39200, 37.70 and 40.00, 33.18 ton/fad. (treatment or plot), respectively. On the other hand using 2 traps/ fad., recorded the lowest yield. These results suggest that (chlorantraniliprole) is necessary in control of tomato leafminer in combination with using 4 phermone traps/fad., for achieving an effective control of this pest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Four traps plus chlorantraniliprole significantly reduced Tuta absoluta infestation in all plots over two seasons compared with two traps plus chlorantraniliprole or chlorantraniliprole alone.

Treatment
4 traps + spraying with chlorantraniliprolee1
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
infestationse1
Direction
reductione1
Comparator
2 phermone traps spraying with chlorantraniliprolee1
Setting
Abo-kabir District, Sharkia Governorate Egypte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuta absoluta (Myrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelichiidae) males in an open tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“significant reduction of infestations in all plots during two seasons when plots treated with 4 traps + spraying with chlorantraniliprole than using 2 phermone traps spraying with chlorantraniliprole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–777 · show in text ↑
e2

“during growing seasons 2015 and 2016 at Abo-kabir District, Sharkia Governorate Egypt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2015 the efficiency of reducing Tuta absoluta larval numbers in treated plots was 63.97% to 92.26%, relative to the check control plot.

Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
efficiency in reducing larve numberse3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
92.26, 90.53, 84.41, 66.50 and 63.97%e3
Comparator
check control plote5

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuta absoluta (Myrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelichiidae) males in an open tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“The efficiency in reducing larve numbers were 92.26, 90.53, 84.41, 66.50 and 63.97% during season 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–929 · show in text ↑
e5

“in addition to check control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2016 the efficiency of reducing Tuta absoluta larval numbers in treated plots was 64.24% to 93.50%, relative to the check control plot.

Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
efficiency in reducing larve numberse3
Direction
reducinge3
Value
93.50,90.68, 84.75, 70.92 and 64.24%e4
Comparator
check control plote5

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuta absoluta (Myrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelichiidae) males in an open tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“The efficiency in reducing larve numbers were 92.26, 90.53, 84.41, 66.50 and 63.97% during season 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–929 · show in text ↑
e4

“while values were 93.50,90.68, 84.75, 70.92 and 64.24% in 2016 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1000 · show in text ↑
e5

“in addition to check control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2015 four pheromone traps per faddan caught more Tuta absoluta males per trap per week than two traps (261.00 versus 204.40).

Treatment
using 4 trapse7
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
catching malese7
Direction
bettere7
Value
261.00 and 204.40 males/traps/weeke7
Comparator
two traps/ faddane7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuta absoluta (Myrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelichiidae) males in an open tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–124 · show in text ↑
e7

“using 4 traps was better than two traps/ faddan in catching males which recorded 261.00 and 204.40 males/traps/week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2016 four pheromone traps per faddan caught more Tuta absoluta males per trap per week than two traps (250.30 versus 201.10).

Treatment
using 4 trapse7
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae0pest
Outcome
catching malese7
Direction
bettere7
Value
250.30 and 201.10 males/traps/weeke6
Comparator
two traps/ faddane7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuta absoluta (Myrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelichiidae) males in an open tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–124 · show in text ↑
e7

“using 4 traps was better than two traps/ faddan in catching males which recorded 261.00 and 204.40 males/traps/week”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1203–1318 · show in text ↑
e6

“250.30 and 201.10 males/traps/week during 2015 and 2016 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four traps combined with chlorantraniliprole was the best treatment for total yield per faddan in both 2015 and 2016, compared with two traps combined with chlorantraniliprole.

Treatment
using 4 traps + spraying with chlorantraniliprolee2
Outcome
total yield per faddane1
Direction
best treatmente2
Comparator
using 2 traps + spraying withe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuta absoluta (Myrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelichiidae) males in an open tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“For the total yield per faddan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1432 · show in text ↑
e2

“using 4 traps + spraying with chlorantraniliprole was the best treatment than using 2 traps + spraying with during 2015 and 2016 seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1594 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total yield per faddan was reported as 39200 and 37.70 in 2015 and 40.00 and 33.18 ton/fad in 2016 across the treatments; the mapping of these values to treatments is not clear in the abstract.

Outcome
total yield per faddane1
Value
39200, 37.70 and 40.00, 33.18 ton/fade3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuta absoluta (Myrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelichiidae) males in an open tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“For the total yield per faddan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1432 · show in text ↑
e3

“39200, 37.70 and 40.00, 33.18 ton/fad”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Using two traps per faddan gave the lowest yield.

Treatment
using 2 traps/ fad.e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tuta absoluta (Myrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelichiidae) males in an open tomato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“On the other hand using 2 traps/ fad., recorded the lowest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1768 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend chlorantraniliprole in combination with four pheromone traps per faddan for effective control of tomato leafminer.

Treatment
using 4 phermone traps/fad.e1
Interactor
tomato leafminerLiriomyza bryoniaee1pest
Outcome
control of tomato leafminere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Liriomyza bryoniae
Liriomyza bryoniae · InteractorAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“is necessary in control of tomato leafminer in combination with using 4 phermone traps/fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1910 · show in text ↑

chlorantraniliprole · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

chlorantraniliprole · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

trap barrier · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

296 papers: 261 positive, 35 negative or no effect

260 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

292 papers more in this group

See all 296 papers →

trap barrier · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.