Abstract
Increases in crop yield and decreases in industrial sulfur emissions reduce the amount of sulfur (S) in the soil. Sufficient S and proper pH play an important role in achieving the targeted yield and quality of wheat. In recent years, composite fertilizers containing sulfur and mineral substances have been produced and used in wheat production as fertilizers. In this study, an investigation was made as to whether the use of such fertilizer is sufficient for sulfur fertilization. Basal fertilizer (13.25.5 + 10 (SO3) + Zn (0.5)) (250 kg ha-1) was applied to the whole plot, and additional elemental sulfur was added. The amounts of sulfur in the plots at the end of the applications were 10, 300, 600 and 900 kg ha-1 S. One year later, the high dose (600 and 900 kg ha-1) S resulted in a decrease in pH of about 0.5 pH units, while two years later, all S doses resulted in a 1 pH unit decrease. However, the changes in the second year were not induced by the S treatments. Accordingly, no significant effect of S doses on grain protein, mineral content or yield was determined. Wheat variety and year had a significant effect on grain nutrient content. The lowest sulfur dose (10 kg ha-1 S) used in the experiment can be said to be sufficient for yield and mineral concentration.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
High sulfur doses lowered soil pH about 0.5 units after one year.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 600 and 900 kg ha-1e0
- Outcome
- pHe0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 0.5 pH unitse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“One year later, the high dose (600 and 900 kg ha-1) S resulted in a decrease in pH of about 0.5 pH units”
t0“Effects of extra sulfur fertilization on soil pH and grain mineral concentration in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
After two years, pH declined one unit across all sulfur doses, but the authors did not attribute the change to treatment.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- pH unit decreasee0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 1 pH unite0
- Qualifier
- not induced by the S treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“two years later, all S doses resulted in a 1 pH unit decrease. However, the changes in the second year were not induced by the S treatments.”
t0“Effects of extra sulfur fertilization on soil pH and grain mineral concentration in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur dose had no significant effect on grain protein.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- S dosese0
- Outcome
- grain proteine0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no significant effect of S doses on grain protein, mineral content or yield was determined.”
t0“Effects of extra sulfur fertilization on soil pH and grain mineral concentration in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur dose had no significant effect on grain mineral content.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- S dosese0
- Outcome
- mineral contente0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no significant effect of S doses on grain protein, mineral content or yield was determined.”
t0“Effects of extra sulfur fertilization on soil pH and grain mineral concentration in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulfur dose had no significant effect on yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- S dosese0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“no significant effect of S doses on grain protein, mineral content or yield was determined.”
t0“Effects of extra sulfur fertilization on soil pH and grain mineral concentration in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat variety and year significantly affected grain nutrient content.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Wheat varietye0
- Outcome
- grain nutrient contente0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat variety and year had a significant effect on grain nutrient content.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors judged the lowest sulfur dose sufficient for yield and mineral concentration.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 10 kg ha-1 Se0
- Outcome
- sufficient for yield and mineral concentratione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The lowest sulfur dose (10 kg ha-1 S) used in the experiment can be said to be sufficient for yield and mineral concentration.”
t0“Effects of extra sulfur fertilization on soil pH and grain mineral concentration in wheat”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 124 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
144 papers more in this group
See all 148 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.