Paper · 2020 · Sakarya University Journal of Science

Effects of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on Physiological Parameters Against Salinity in Apple Cultivar “Fuji”

Şeyma ARIKAN; Lütfi PIRLAK

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
5
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The present study was conducted with the cultivar ‘Fuji’ grafted on M9 rootstock in both 2014 and 2016 years. The effect of PGPR (Bacillus subtilis EY2, Bacillus atrophaeus EY6, Bacillus spharicus GC subgroup B EY30, Staphylococcus kloosii EY37 and Kocuria erythromyxa EY43) were investigated under salt stress conditions. PGPR’s effects were tested on leaf relative water content (LRWC), membrane permeability, stomatal conductivity, photosynthetic activity and chlorophyll content (by SPAD-502). The saplings were grown in pots filled 2:1:1 peat: perlite: sand. Salinity was obtained by NaCl: Na2SO4: CaCl2: MgSO4 (7:9:3:1) solution. The solution was applied twice a week with irrigation during the growing period. When the salinity reached 2.5-3.0 dScm-1, the solution application was ended. All bacteria treatments significantly reduced the physiological damage of leaves compared with the salt treatment in both two years. The LRWC range from 13.33 % (salt treatment) to 26.76 % (control). The best result of bacteria treatment was measured in EY43 with 23.93 % LRWC. The highest rate of membrane permeability was found in salt treatment (30.35 %). The stomatal conductivity was decreased in the salt application (154.35 mmol m-2s-1) unlike EY43 treatment (234.44 mmol m-2s-1). Similarly, EY43 treatment significantly increased photosynthetic activity (15.24 µmol CO2 m-2s-1) compared with the salt treatment (8.22 µmol CO2 m-2s-1). As a result, bacteria strains had been ameliorative of the deleterious effects under salt stress on “Fuji”.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatments significantly reduced leaf physiological damage relative to salt treatment in both years.

Treatment
bacteria treatmentse0
Outcome
physiological damage of leavese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
salt treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All bacteria treatments significantly reduced the physiological damage of leaves compared with the salt treatment in both two years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt treatment had 13.33% leaf relative water content versus 26.76% in controls.

Treatment
salt treatmente0
Outcome
LRWCe0
Value
13.33 %e0
Qualifier
26.76 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The LRWC range from 13.33 % (salt treatment) to 26.76 % (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EY43 had the best bacterial LRWC result at 23.93%.

Treatment
EY43e0
Outcome
LRWCe0
Direction
beste0
Value
23.93 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best result of bacteria treatment was measured in EY43 with 23.93 % LRWC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1071 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt treatment had the highest membrane permeability at 30.35%.

Treatment
salt treatmente0
Outcome
membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
30.35 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest rate of membrane permeability was found in salt treatment (30.35 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1152 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt reduced stomatal conductivity to 154.35 mmol m-2s-1 relative to EY43 at 234.44.

Treatment
salt applicatione0
Outcome
stomatal conductivitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
154.35 mmol m-2s-1e0
Qualifier
234.44 mmol m-2s-1e0
Comparator
EY43 treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The stomatal conductivity was decreased in the salt application (154.35 mmol m-2s-1) unlike EY43 treatment (234.44 mmol m-2s-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EY43 significantly increased photosynthetic activity to 15.24 µmol CO2 m-2s-1 versus salt treatment at 8.22.

Treatment
EY43 treatmente0
Outcome
photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.24 µmol CO2 m-2s-1e0
Qualifier
8.22 µmol CO2 m-2s-1e0
Comparator
salt treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EY43 treatment significantly increased photosynthetic activity (15.24 µmol CO2 m-2s-1) compared with the salt treatment (8.22 µmol CO2 m-2s-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude bacterial strains ameliorated salt stress effects in Fuji.

Taxon
Fujie0
Outcome
deleterious effects under salt stresse0
Direction
ameliorativee0

Verbatim

e0

“bacteria strains had been ameliorative of the deleterious effects under salt stress on “Fuji””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1544 · show in text ↑

inoculation · pest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

salinity · physiology: oxidative · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.