Paper · 2010 · Journal of Plant Production

EFFECT OF FOLIAR APPLICATION WITH AMINOTOTAL UNDER DIFFERENT RATES FROM NITROGEN FERTILIZER ON YIELD AND ITS COMPONENTS OF GIZA 86 COTTON CULTIVAR.

A. El-Gabiery; E. Mesbah

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out at Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Station, Gharbia Governorate during two seasons (2008 and 2009) to study the effect of four aminototal concentration (i.e without, 1g/L, 2g/L and 3g/L) under three N (15, 30. and 45 Kg N/fad.) and their interaction on leaf chemical composition, yield and yield components of the Egyptian cotton cultivar, Giza 86. Results indicated that the differences between N rates for leaf N content, number of fruiting branches / plant, plant height, number of flowers and bolls / plant, earliness %, boll weight , seed cotton yield per plant and per fad. were significant in the two seasons, where, boll setting % and boll shedding % were significant in the first season only. Rate of N fertilizer 45 kg N/fad. Gave the highest values for leaf N content, number of fruiting branches per plant and plant height, where, 30 kg N/fad. Gave the highest values for leaf K content, number of flowers and bolls per plant , boll weight, seed cotton yield / plant and per fad., on the other hand, 15 kg N/fad gave the best values for earliness % in the both seasons. The differences between 45 kg N/fad and 30 kg N/fad. were insignificant for all studied traits in the both seasons. Foliar application of aminototal gave a significant effect on leaf N and K contents, number of fruiting branches per plant, plant height, number of flowers and bolls per plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield per plant and per fad. on the other hand, earliness %, boll setting and boll shedding % were insignificant in the two seasons. Foliar cotton plants with concentration of 3 or 2g/L from aminototal gave the highest values of most studied attributes. The differences between 2g and 3g/L aminototal were in significant of all studied traits.The interaction between N rates and aminototal concentration were significant for all studied traits except earliness % in the two seasons. Also, results show that, fertilization cotton plants with 30 kg N/fad. and sprayed with 2g/L aminototal increased the yield and yield components under experiment soil conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rates significantly differed for leaf N content and several yield traits in both seasons.

Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
leaf N content, number of fruiting branches / plant, plant heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“differences between N rates for leaf N content, number of fruiting branches / plant, plant height, number of flowers and bolls / plant, earliness %, boll weight , seed cotton yield per plant and per fad. were significant in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rates significantly differed for boll setting and shedding only in the first season.

Outcome
boll setting % and boll shedding %e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“boll setting % and boll shedding % were significant in the first season only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–738 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45 kg N/fad. rate gave highest leaf N, fruiting branches and height.

Treatment
N fertilizer 45 kg N/fad.e0
Outcome
leaf N content, number of fruiting branches per plant and plant heighte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Rate of N fertilizer 45 kg N/fad. Gave the highest values for leaf N content, number of fruiting branches per plant and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30 kg N/fad. rate gave highest leaf K, flowers, bolls, boll weight and seed cotton yield.

Treatment
30 kg N/fad.e0
Outcome
leaf K content, number of flowers and bolls per plante0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“30 kg N/fad. Gave the highest values for leaf K content, number of flowers and bolls per plant , boll weight, seed cotton yield / plant and per fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15 kg N/fad rate gave best earliness in both seasons.

Treatment
15 kg N/fade0
Outcome
earliness %e0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“15 kg N/fad gave the best values for earliness % in the both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 45 and 30 kg N/fad. rates did not differ significantly across traits.

Treatment
45 kg N/fade0
Outcome
all studied traitse0
Direction
insignificante0
Comparator
30 kg N/fad.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“differences between 45 kg N/fad and 30 kg N/fad. were insignificant for all studied traits in the both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1234 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aminototal significantly affected leaf N and K and production traits.

Treatment
Foliar application of aminototale0
Outcome
leaf N and K contentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar application of aminototal gave a significant effect on leaf N and K contents, number of fruiting branches per plant, plant height, number of flowers and bolls per plant, boll weight, seed cotton yield per plant and per fad.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aminototal had no significant effect on earliness, boll setting or shedding.

Outcome
earliness %, boll setting and boll shedding %e0
Direction
insignificante0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“earliness %, boll setting and boll shedding % were insignificant in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aminototal at 3 or 2 g/L gave highest values for most traits.

Treatment
3 or 2g/L from aminototale0
Outcome
most studied attributese0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“Foliar cotton plants with concentration of 3 or 2g/L from aminototal gave the highest values of most studied attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1690 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aminototal at 2 versus 3 g/L showed no significant differences across traits.

Treatment
2ge0
Outcome
all studied traitse0
Direction
in significante0
Comparator
3g/L aminototale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“differences between 2g and 3g/L aminototal were in significant of all studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen by aminototal interactions were significant for studied traits except earliness.

Treatment
N rates and aminototal concentratione0
Outcome
all studied traits except earliness %e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction between N rates and aminototal concentration were significant for all studied traits except earliness % in the two seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thirty kg N/fad. plus 2 g/L aminototal increased yield and yield components.

Treatment
30 kg N/fad. and sprayed with 2g/L aminototale0
Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COTTON”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–137 · show in text ↑
e0

“30 kg N/fad. and sprayed with 2g/L aminototal increased the yield and yield components under experiment soil conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1979–2098 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 286 positive, 57 negative or no effect

285 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

339 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.