Paper · 2020 · Peanut Science

Evaluation of Runner-Type Peanut Cultivar Tolerance to Paraquat Tank Mixes

Katilyn Price; Xiao Li; Andrew Price; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Herbicide tank mixes are often used to reduce peanut injury caused by paraquat and broaden the weed control spectrum. New peanut cultivars are continuously being introduced therefore determining tolerance to paraquat based herbicide programs is essential to provide growers with appropriate recommendations. The objective of this trial was to evaluate effect of paraquat based herbicide programs on newer peanut cultivars growth and yield. Field trials were conducted in Macon, Henry and Baldwin counties in Alabama in 2016 and 2017 and the peanut cultivars ‘Georgia 06G', ‘Georgia 12Y', ‘Georgia 14N', and ‘TufRunner 511’ were evaluated. Paraquat was applied alone (210, 280, 420 g ai/ha), in tank mixes with either bentazon plus acifluorfen or 2,4-DB and one of the following, S-metolachlor, pyroxasulfone, acetochlor, or pyroxasulfone plus carfentrazone at the highest labeled rates 3 to 4 wk after peanut planting. No cultivar by treatment interactions were observed for any growth parameters evaluated for any location. In 2017, paraquat either applied at 280 g ai/ha alone, tank mixed with S-metolachlor plus 2,4-DB, or with S-metolachlor plus bentazon plus acifluorfen significantly reduced canopy widths of 22 to 30%, 12 to 22%, and 20 to 37% respectively at 45 to 48 DAP when compared to the non-treated check (NTC). Yield reductions compared to the NTC were rare, paraquat plus bentazon plus acifluorfen plus pyroxasulfone plus carfentrazone had a 13% yield loss in Henry County and a 7% yield loss with paraquat 280 g ai/ha at Baldwin County in 2016 only. Data indicates peanut stunting may be observed following applications of paraquat tank mixes evaluated in this study, but it is unlikely these effects result in yield loss.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar and treatment did not interact for measured growth traits at any location.

Taxon
cultivare0
Outcome
cultivar by treatment interactionse0

Verbatim

e0

“No cultivar by treatment interactions were observed for any growth parameters evaluated for any location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1032 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat alone at 280 g ai/ha reduced canopy width by 22 to 30% in 2017.

Treatment
paraquat either applied at 280 g ai/ha alonee0
Outcome
canopy widthse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22 to 30%e0
Comparator
non-treated check (NTC)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2017, paraquat either applied at 280 g ai/ha alone, tank mixed with S-metolachlor plus 2,4-DB, or with S-metolachlor plus bentazon plus acifluorfen significantly reduced canopy widths of 22 to 30%, 12 to 22%, and 20 to 37% respectively at 45 to 48 DAP when compared to the non-treated check (NTC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat with S-metolachlor and 2,4-DB reduced canopy width by 12 to 22% in 2017.

Treatment
S-metolachlor plus 2,4-DBe0
Outcome
canopy widthse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
12 to 22%e0
Comparator
non-treated check (NTC)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2017, paraquat either applied at 280 g ai/ha alone, tank mixed with S-metolachlor plus 2,4-DB, or with S-metolachlor plus bentazon plus acifluorfen significantly reduced canopy widths of 22 to 30%, 12 to 22%, and 20 to 37% respectively at 45 to 48 DAP when compared to the non-treated check (NTC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat with S-metolachlor, bentazon and acifluorfen reduced canopy width by 20 to 37% in 2017.

Treatment
S-metolachlor plus bentazon plus acifluorfene0
Outcome
canopy widthse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20 to 37%e0
Comparator
non-treated check (NTC)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2017, paraquat either applied at 280 g ai/ha alone, tank mixed with S-metolachlor plus 2,4-DB, or with S-metolachlor plus bentazon plus acifluorfen significantly reduced canopy widths of 22 to 30%, 12 to 22%, and 20 to 37% respectively at 45 to 48 DAP when compared to the non-treated check (NTC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat with bentazon, acifluorfen, pyroxasulfone and carfentrazone caused 13% yield loss in Henry County.

Treatment
paraquat plus bentazon plus acifluorfen plus pyroxasulfone plus carfentrazonee0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
13%e0
Comparator
NTCe1
Setting
Henry Countye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“paraquat plus bentazon plus acifluorfen plus pyroxasulfone plus carfentrazone had a 13% yield loss in Henry County”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1497 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield reductions compared to the NTC were rare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat at 280 g ai/ha caused 7% yield loss in Baldwin County in 2016.

Treatment
paraquat 280 g ai/hae0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
7%e0
Comparator
NTCe1
Setting
Baldwin Countye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a 7% yield loss with paraquat 280 g ai/ha at Baldwin County in 2016 only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1574 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield reductions compared to the NTC were rare”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1381 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–32 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peanut stunting after these paraquat mixtures is unlikely to cause yield loss.

Outcome
peanut stuntinge0
Qualifier
unlikely these effects result in yield losse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peanut stunting may be observed following applications of paraquat tank mixes evaluated in this study, but it is unlikely these effects result in yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1747 · show in text ↑

pyroxasulfone · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

acifluorfen · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

bentazone · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

paraquat · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 8 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    Paraquat-containing systems increased peanut yields by 230 kg/ha.

    Postemergence Weed Management Systems for Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) · 1990 · compared with herbicide systems not containing paraquat

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

acifluorfen · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

bentazone · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

paraquat · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.