Paper · 1971 · Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of aeration and mineral supply on growth and mineral content of shoots and roots of apple trees (var. 'Golden Delicious' on M.IX).

J. Visser; J.T. Locher; R. Brouwer

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

One- or 2-year-old Golden Delicious apple trees on M.IX were grown either in a clay loam (in 60-1 containers) or in nutrient solution and the effects were studied of several aeration regimes. With the soil-grown trees these comprised flooding to various soil depths and for different times. With the trees grown in nutrient solution the aeration regimes compared were nutrient solution without aeration, tap water with or without aeration, and aerated nutrient solution (control). Shoot growth was depressed by high water tables, and that of trees receiving non-aerated nutrient solution or tap water (whether aerated or not) ceased after about 2 weeks. The root growth of trees receiving non-aerated nutrient solution or tap water was similarly depressed, but, by contrast, aerated tap water enhanced root growth. Details are given of treatment effects on the Ca, K, N and soluble sugar contents of the young and old leaves and of the young roots. The uptake of all mineral elements was similarly affected by lack of aeration, suggesting that the relationship between low Ca content and increased bitter pit incidence is not associated with differential absorption but rather with differential Ca distribution. (Abstract retrieved from CAB Abstracts by CABI’s permission)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High water tables depressed shoot growth of apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
high water tablese1
Outcome
Shoot growthe1
Direction
depressede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One- or 2-year-old Golden Delicious apple trees on M.IX were grown either in a clay loam (in 60-1 containers) or in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoot growth was depressed by high water tables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot growth of apple trees receiving non-aerated nutrient solution or tap water ceased after about 2 weeks.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
non-aerated nutrient solution or tap watere2
Outcome
Shoot growthe1
Direction
ceasede2
Value
about 2 weekse2
Comparator
aerated nutrient solution (control)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One- or 2-year-old Golden Delicious apple trees on M.IX were grown either in a clay loam (in 60-1 containers) or in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shoot growth was depressed by high water tables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–528 · show in text ↑
e2

“that of trees receiving non-aerated nutrient solution or tap water (whether aerated or not) ceased after about 2 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–652 · show in text ↑
e7

“aerated nutrient solution (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root growth of apple trees receiving non-aerated nutrient solution or tap water was depressed.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
non-aerated nutrient solution or tap watere3
Outcome
root growthe3
Direction
depressede3
Comparator
aerated nutrient solution (control)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One- or 2-year-old Golden Delicious apple trees on M.IX were grown either in a clay loam (in 60-1 containers) or in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e3

“The root growth of trees receiving non-aerated nutrient solution or tap water was similarly depressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–755 · show in text ↑
e7

“aerated nutrient solution (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerated tap water enhanced root growth of apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
aerated tap watere4
Outcome
root growthe4
Direction
enhancede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One- or 2-year-old Golden Delicious apple trees on M.IX were grown either in a clay loam (in 60-1 containers) or in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e4

“by contrast, aerated tap water enhanced root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lack of aeration similarly affected the uptake of all mineral elements by apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
lack of aeratione5
Outcome
uptake of all mineral elementse5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One- or 2-year-old Golden Delicious apple trees on M.IX were grown either in a clay loam (in 60-1 containers) or in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e5

“The uptake of all mineral elements was similarly affected by lack of aeration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1026 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The link between low Ca content and bitter pit incidence reflects differential Ca distribution in apple trees, not differential absorption.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Compound
Cae6
Outcome
bitter pit incidencee6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
differential Ca distributione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One- or 2-year-old Golden Delicious apple trees on M.IX were grown either in a clay loam (in 60-1 containers) or in nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–133 · show in text ↑
e6

“the relationship between low Ca content and increased bitter pit incidence is not associated with differential absorption but rather with differential Ca distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1210 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 90 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 90 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.