Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Soil Biochar Ameliorates Salinity Stress and Improves Nutrient Uptake, Biomass Production and Physiochemical Parameters in Sunflower

Rizwan Rasheed; Abida Parveen; Muhammad Riaz; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

<ns2:p>A pot experiment was set-up to assess the modulations in growth, oxidative defense, osmotic adjustment, secondary metabolism, and ion homeostasis in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) sown in corncob biochar amended (0, 1, 2 and 3%) soil under salinity stress. Sunflower cultivars (FH-687 and FH-697) were subjected to NaCl salinity (0 and 15 dS m-1) three weeks after germination. Salinity resulted in significant decrease in growth, photosynthetic pigments, RWC, K+, P contents and increase in Na+, Ca2+, MDA, RMP, H2O2, TFAA, TSP, TSS, GB, and proline. Biochar (3%) enhanced the activities of antioxidant enzymes and concentration of non-enzymatic antioxidant compounds (flavonoids, phenolics, and ascorbic acid). Biochar increased the cellular concentrations of glycine betaine and free proline that resulted in better osmotic adjustment under saline conditions. Biochar-induced upregulation of oxidative defense and decrease in specific ion toxicity was variable in two cultivars. Cultivar FH-687 exhibited better salinity tolerance compared with FH-697 in the form of greater oxidative defense and osmotic adjustment alongside the lower specific ion toxicity.</ns2:p>

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly decreased growth, photosynthetic pigments, RWC, K+ and P.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Salinitye1
Outcome
growth, photosynthetic pigments, RWC, K+, P contentse1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity resulted in significant decrease in growth, photosynthetic pigments, RWC, K+, P contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity increased Na+, Ca2+, MDA, RMP, H2O2, TFAA, TSP, TSS, GB and proline.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
Na+, Ca2+, MDA, RMP, H2O2, TFAA, TSP, TSS, GB, and prolinee1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in Na+, Ca2+, MDA, RMP, H2O2, TFAA, TSP, TSS, GB, and proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three percent biochar enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Biochar (3%)e1
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymese1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biochar (3%) enhanced the activities of antioxidant enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three percent biochar enhanced flavonoid, phenolic and ascorbic acid concentrations.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Biochar (3%)e1
Outcome
concentration of non-enzymatic antioxidant compounds (flavonoids, phenolics, and ascorbic acid)e1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biochar (3%) enhanced the activities of antioxidant enzymes and concentration of non-enzymatic antioxidant compounds (flavonoids, phenolics, and ascorbic acid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–720 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar raised glycine betaine and free proline concentrations under salinity.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Biochare1
Outcome
cellular concentrations of glycine betaine and free prolinee1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
under saline conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biochar increased the cellular concentrations of glycine betaine and free proline that resulted in better osmotic adjustment under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–870 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar improved osmotic adjustment under saline conditions.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Compound
glycine betaine and free prolinee1
Outcome
better osmotic adjustmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“glycine betaine and free proline that resulted in better osmotic adjustment under saline conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–870 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar related oxidative defense and ion toxicity responses varied between cultivars.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Biochare1
Outcome
upregulation of oxidative defense and decrease in specific ion toxicity was variable in two cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biochar-induced upregulation of oxidative defense and decrease in specific ion toxicity was variable in two cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–989 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FH-687 had better salinity tolerance than FH-697, with greater defense and osmotic adjustment and lower ion toxicity.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
FH-687e1
Outcome
salinity tolerancee1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
FH-697e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cultivar FH-687 exhibited better salinity tolerance compared with FH-697 in the form of greater oxidative defense and osmotic adjustment alongside the lower specific ion toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1169 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

biochar · physiology: osmolytes · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biochar · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.