Paper · 2020 · JP Journal of Biostatistics

THE STUDY OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHYSIOLOGICAL BEHAVIOR AND YIELD OF WHEAT (TRITICUM AESTIVUM L.) BY USING OF NITROGEN AND ZINC SOURCES AND INTERACTION OF THESE ELEMENTS

Hassan Modareszadeh; Mohammad Ali Rezaei; Hossein Ajam Norouzi; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The study of the synergistic and antagonistic effects of using nutrients, respectively, to better absorb or prevent the absorption of other elements, and the optimal balance between nutrients and plant yield has always attracted the attention of biological and agricultural sciences researchers. In this research, effects of nitrogen sources in four levels including: 100% urea fertilizer (N1), nano-chelate nitrogen fertilizer (N2), 100% panaromix biological fertilizer (N3) and 50% urea + 50% panaromix biological fertilizer (N4) and zinc sources in three levels including: without application of Zn fertilizer (control) (Z1), zinc sulfate fertilizer (Z2) and nano-chelate zinc fertilizer (Z3) and interaction effects of sources of these two elements on physiological behavior and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and interaction of these elements as a split-plot factorial based on completely randomized blocks design with 3 replication and 12 treatments is studied. Results showed that leaf area and number of leafs, shoot length, chl b and chl (a + b) content and nitrate reductase activity as well as biological yield and grain yield were affected by the sources of nitrogen supply and the interaction effects of sources of these two elements (N*Zn) and in treatments containing 100% urea and 50% urea + 50% biological fertilizer that were used as a source of nitrogen supply, showed highest content but in all of these traits, there was no significant difference in sources of zinc supply. The results of the present study indicated that in treatments of the interaction effects of sources of these two elements (N*Zn), the highest of chl b and total chl (a + b) content and nitrate reductase activity were observed in Z2N1 (100% urea + zinc sulfate fertilizer) treatment. The highest economic yield and biological yield were also associated with the same treatment. The results indicated that there was synergistic interaction between N and Zn and high yield of plant in Z2N1 treatment is a function of plant physiological behavior. Received: January 22, 2020 Accepted: February 11, 2020

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen source affected leaf area, number of leaves and shoot length of wheat; direction and significance not stated.

Treatment
sources of nitrogen supplye1
Outcome
leaf area and number of leafs, shoot lengthe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area and number of leafs, shoot length, chl b and chl (a + b) content and nitrate reductase activity as well as biological yield and grain yield were affected by the sources of nitrogen supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen source affected chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and nitrate reductase activity of wheat; direction and significance not stated.

Treatment
sources of nitrogen supplye1
Outcome
chl b and chl (a + b) content and nitrate reductase activitye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area and number of leafs, shoot length, chl b and chl (a + b) content and nitrate reductase activity as well as biological yield and grain yield were affected by the sources of nitrogen supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen source affected biological yield and grain yield of wheat; direction and significance not stated.

Treatment
sources of nitrogen supplye1
Outcome
biological yield and grain yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–820 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf area and number of leafs, shoot length, chl b and chl (a + b) content and nitrate reductase activity as well as biological yield and grain yield were affected by the sources of nitrogen supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment with 100% urea and the 50% urea plus 50% biological fertilizer gave the highest content of the measured traits in wheat.

Treatment
100% urea and 50% urea + 50% biological fertilizere3
Outcome
contente3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–820 · show in text ↑
e3

“in treatments containing 100% urea and 50% urea + 50% biological fertilizer that were used as a source of nitrogen supply, showed highest content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc source made no significant difference to the measured traits of wheat.

Treatment
sources of zinc supplye4
Outcome
these traitse4
Direction
no significant differencee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–820 · show in text ↑
e4

“in all of these traits, there was no significant difference in sources of zinc supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Z2N1 treatment (100% urea + zinc sulfate fertilizer) gave the highest chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and nitrate reductase activity.

Treatment
Z2N1 (100% urea + zinc sulfate fertilizer)e5
Outcome
chl b and total chl (a + b) content and nitrate reductase activitye5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–820 · show in text ↑
e5

“the highest of chl b and total chl (a + b) content and nitrate reductase activity were observed in Z2N1 (100% urea + zinc sulfate fertilizer) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Z2N1 treatment (100% urea + zinc sulfate fertilizer) was associated with the highest economic and biological yield of wheat.

Treatment
Z2N1 (100% urea + zinc sulfate fertilizer)e5
Outcome
economic yield and biological yielde6
Direction
higheste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–820 · show in text ↑
e5

“the highest of chl b and total chl (a + b) content and nitrate reductase activity were observed in Z2N1 (100% urea + zinc sulfate fertilizer) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1783 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest economic yield and biological yield were also associated with the same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1877 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High yield of wheat in the Z2N1 treatment is a function of plant physiological behaviour, with a synergistic N x Zn interaction.

Treatment
Z2N1 treatmente7
Outcome
high yield of plante7
Qualifier
synergistic interaction between N and Zne7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–820 · show in text ↑
e7

“The results indicated that there was synergistic interaction between N and Zn and high yield of plant in Z2N1 treatment is a function of plant physiological behavior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1879–2044 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

fertilization · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 40 positive, 8 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
    Nitrogen deficiency did not stimulate root protease activity.

    Do plants use root-derived proteases to promote the uptake of soil organic nitrogen? · 2020 · compared with with and without inorganic N

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 114 positive, 52 negative or no effect

113 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.