Paper · 2020 · PeerJ

Using organic fertilizers to increase crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality in a temperate farmland

Yu Cen; Liyue Guo; Meizhen Liu; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
71
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We used a constant total N application base rate to conduct a two-year field experiment comparing the effects of three organic fertilizers (rapeseed meal (RSM), soybean meal (SBM), and cattle manure (CM)) on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system. Winter wheat and summer maize in rapeseed meal treatment (RSMT), soybean meal treatment (SBMT), and cattle manure treatment (CMT) showed yield increases of 161%, 299%, and 256%, respectively, when compared to no organic fertilizer treatment (CK) ( P < 0.05). The annual net incomes of SBMT and CMT were 1.46 and 1.42 times higher, respectively, than RSMT. Compared to the results of the CK group, RSM, SBM, and CM stimulated the soil physically, chemically, and biologically. We found the highest soil macroaggregate proportions, soil organic matter (SOM) levels, total N (TN) levels, and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) levels in SBMT. The highest soil pH, microbial biomass carbon (MBC) levels, and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) levels were observed in CMT. We used a soil quality index (SQI) to evaluate soil quality. After the two-year fertilization treatments, we calculated the SQI using a minimum data set (MDS). We used SOM levels and actinomycete quantity for the MDS properties. The SQI values were significantly different across the four treatments, with the highest values occurring in SBMT, then CMT and RSMT. In conclusion, SBM and CM were more effective than RSM at maintaining crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapeseed meal treatment increased winter wheat and summer maize yield by 161% relative to no organic fertilizer

Taxon
Winter wheat and summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
rapeseed meal treatment (RSMT)e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
161%e1
Comparator
no organic fertilizer treatment (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter wheat and summer maize in rapeseed meal treatment (RSMT), soybean meal treatment (SBMT), and cattle manure treatment (CMT) showed yield increases of 161%, 299%, and 256%, respectively, when compared to no organic fertilizer treatment (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean meal treatment increased winter wheat and summer maize yield by 299% relative to no organic fertilizer

Taxon
Winter wheat and summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
soybean meal treatment (SBMT)e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
299%e1
Comparator
no organic fertilizer treatment (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter wheat and summer maize in rapeseed meal treatment (RSMT), soybean meal treatment (SBMT), and cattle manure treatment (CMT) showed yield increases of 161%, 299%, and 256%, respectively, when compared to no organic fertilizer treatment (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure treatment increased winter wheat and summer maize yield by 256% relative to no organic fertilizer

Taxon
Winter wheat and summer maizeTriticum aestivumZea mayse1
Treatment
cattle manure treatment (CMT)e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
256%e1
Comparator
no organic fertilizer treatment (CK)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter wheat and summer maize in rapeseed meal treatment (RSMT), soybean meal treatment (SBMT), and cattle manure treatment (CMT) showed yield increases of 161%, 299%, and 256%, respectively, when compared to no organic fertilizer treatment (CK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–551 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual net income under soybean meal treatment was 1.46 times that under rapeseed meal treatment

Taxon
winter wheat-summer maizee0
Treatment
SBMTe2
Outcome
annual net incomese2
Direction
highere2
Value
1.46e2
Comparator
RSMTe2

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“The annual net incomes of SBMT and CMT were 1.46 and 1.42 times higher, respectively, than RSMT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual net income under cattle manure treatment was 1.42 times that under rapeseed meal treatment

Taxon
winter wheat-summer maizee0
Treatment
CMTe2
Outcome
annual net incomese2
Direction
highere2
Value
1.42e2
Comparator
RSMTe2

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“The annual net incomes of SBMT and CMT were 1.46 and 1.42 times higher, respectively, than RSMT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rapeseed meal, soybean meal and cattle manure stimulated soil physical, chemical and biological properties relative to the control group

Taxon
winter wheat-summer maizee0
Treatment
RSM, SBM, and CMe3
Outcome
soil physically, chemically, and biologicallye3
Direction
stimulatede3
Comparator
CK groupe3

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e3

“Compared to the results of the CK group, RSM, SBM, and CM stimulated the soil physically, chemically, and biologically”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean meal treatment gave the highest soil macroaggregate proportions, soil organic matter and total N levels

Taxon
winter wheat-summer maizee0
Treatment
SBMTe4
Outcome
soil macroaggregate proportions, soil organic matter (SOM) levels, total N (TN) levelse4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e4

“We found the highest soil macroaggregate proportions, soil organic matter (SOM) levels, total N (TN) levels, and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) levels in SBMT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean meal treatment gave the highest phospholipid fatty acid levels in soil

Taxon
winter wheat-summer maizee0
Treatment
SBMTe4
Outcome
phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) levelse4
Direction
higheste4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e4

“We found the highest soil macroaggregate proportions, soil organic matter (SOM) levels, total N (TN) levels, and phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) levels in SBMT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure treatment gave the highest soil pH and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels

Taxon
winter wheat-summer maizee0
Treatment
CMTe5
Outcome
soil pH, microbial biomass carbon (MBC) levels, and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) levelse5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest soil pH, microbial biomass carbon (MBC) levels, and microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) levels were observed in CMT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1066 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil quality index values differed significantly among the four fertilizer treatments

Taxon
winter wheat-summer maizee0
Outcome
SQI valuese6
Direction
significantly differente6

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e6

“The SQI values were significantly different across the four treatments, with the highest values occurring in SBMT, then CMT and RSMT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil quality index was highest under soybean meal treatment, then cattle manure and rapeseed meal treatment

Taxon
winter wheat-summer maizee0
Treatment
SBMTe6
Outcome
SQI valuese6
Direction
highest valuese6
Comparator
CMT and RSMTe6

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e6

“The SQI values were significantly different across the four treatments, with the highest values occurring in SBMT, then CMT and RSMT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean meal and cattle manure were more effective than rapeseed meal at maintaining crop yield, economic growth and soil quality

Taxon
winter wheat-summer maizee0
Treatment
SBM and CMe7
Outcome
crop yield, economic growth, and soil qualitye7
Direction
more effectivee7
Comparator
RSMe7

Verbatim

e0

“on the crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality of a winter wheat-summer maize rotation system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 205–304 · show in text ↑
e7

“In conclusion, SBM and CM were more effective than RSM at maintaining crop yield, economic growth, and soil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1546 · show in text ↑

Glycine max · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 45 positive, 16 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Glycine max · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 155 positive, 25 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.