Paper · 2020 · New Phytologist

Rapid starch degradation in the wood of olive trees under heat and drought is permitted by three stress‐specific beta amylases

Mor Tsamir‐Rimon; Shifra Ben‐Dor; Ester Feldmesser; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
49
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Summary Carbon reserve use is a major drought response in trees, enabling tree survival in conditions prohibiting photosynthesis. However, regulation of starch metabolism under drought at the whole‐tree scale is still poorly understood. To this end, we combined measurements of nonstructural carbohydrates (NSCs), tree physiology and gene expression. The experiment was conducted outside on olive trees in pots under 90 d of seasonal spring to summer warming. Half of the trees were also subjected to limited water conditions for 28 d. Photosynthesis decreased in dehydrating trees from 19 to 0.5 µmol m −2 s −1 during the drought period. Starch degradation and mannitol production were a major drought response, with mannitol increasing to 71% and 41% out of total NSCs in shoots and roots, respectively. We identified the gene family members potentially relevant either to long‐term or stress‐induced carbon storage. Partitioning of expression patterns among β amylase and starch synthase family members was observed, with three β amylases possibly facilitating the rapid starch degradation under heat and drought. Our results suggest a group of stress‐related, starch metabolism genes, correlated with NSC fluctuations during drought and recovery. The daily starch metabolism gene expression was different from the stress‐mode starch metabolism pattern, where some genes are uniquely expressed during the stress‐mode response.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis fell from 19 to 0.5 µmol m −2 s −1 during dehydration.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Photosynthesise0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
19 to 0.5 µmol m −2 s −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthesis decreased in dehydrating trees from 19 to 0.5 µmol m −2 s −1 during the drought period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–638 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch degradation was a major drought response.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Starch degradatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Starch degradation and mannitol production were a major drought response, with mannitol increasing to 71% and 41% out of total NSCs in shoots and roots, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot mannitol increased to 71% of nonstructural carbohydrates under drought.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
mannitole0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
71%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Starch degradation and mannitol production were a major drought response, with mannitol increasing to 71% and 41% out of total NSCs in shoots and roots, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root mannitol increased to 41% of nonstructural carbohydrates under drought.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
mannitole0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
41%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Starch degradation and mannitol production were a major drought response, with mannitol increasing to 71% and 41% out of total NSCs in shoots and roots, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gene family members potentially relevant to long-term or stress-induced carbon storage were identified.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Outcome
gene family members potentially relevant either to long‐term or stress‐induced carbon storagee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We identified the gene family members potentially relevant either to long‐term or stress‐induced carbon storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Expression patterns partitioned among beta amylase and starch synthase family members.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Gene
β amylase and starch synthase family memberse0
Outcome
Partitioning of expression patternse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Partitioning of expression patterns among β amylase and starch synthase family members was observed, with three β amylases possibly facilitating the rapid starch degradation under heat and drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three beta amylases may facilitate rapid starch degradation under heat and drought.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Treatment
heat and droughte0
Gene
β amylasese0
Outcome
rapid starch degradatione0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three β amylases possibly facilitating the rapid starch degradation under heat and drought.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stress-related starch metabolism genes correlated with NSC fluctuations during drought and recovery.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Gene
starch metabolism genese0
Outcome
NSC fluctuationse0
Qualifier
during drought and recoverye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our results suggest a group of stress‐related, starch metabolism genes, correlated with NSC fluctuations during drought and recovery.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily starch metabolism gene expression differed from stress-mode expression, including genes unique to stress response.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeat0
Gene
starch metabolism genee0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
differente0
Comparator
stress‐mode starch metabolism patterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The daily starch metabolism gene expression was different from the stress‐mode starch metabolism pattern, where some genes are uniquely expressed during the stress‐mode response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

16 papers: 1 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.