Paper · 2009 · Misr journal of agricultural engineering

COMPARISON OF MICRO IRRIGATION SYSTEMS FOR OLIVE TREES

A. Nassar

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Micro-Irrigation Systems (MIS) apply water through small devices which deliver it onto the soil surface very near to the plant, which means in this context the use of bubbler, mini–sprinkler and trickle irrigation systems. From 2003 to 2006, 13 feddans of field research were established in sandy soil at Wadi EL Natrown On-Farm Irrigation Department Research Station operated by the Water Management and Irrigation System Research Institute, to evaluate the effect of MIS on olive trees. The experimental site was arranged in a split plots design. On 08-02-2003 olive trees (Olea europaea L, Calamata cv.) were planted in the center of an irrigated round base of 1 m diameter. The distance between the tree rows and the trees within the same row are 5ms. Each plot was divided into six replicates giving 18 experimental plots. All the micro irrigation systems were designed with the same control head components which consists of non- return valve, flow meter, venturi, air valve, pressure relief valve and 3 pressure gauges. Regarding the distributor units technical specifications and their placement: 1) For the trickle treatment 4 emitters (12 l/h) per each tree placed on one lateral line PE 16 mm diameter passing through the center of the tree round base; where each emitter is 30 cm distant from the next one; 2) For the bubbler treatment one bubbler per each tree (100 l/h) placed in the tree round base , 25 cm distance from the tree stem moving monthly in 180° clockwise to maintain good water distribution; 3) For the mini- sprinkler treatment one mini-sprinkler (70 l/h) per each tree with the same procedure as the bubbler. A comparison was made between the different systems taking into account the following points: olive trees morphology (plant height, stem diameter, shoots number/tree, leaves number/tree, shadow area and root distribution), number of fruits/tree, fruit weight, yield/tree, total yield per feddan, yield efficiency and both soil moisture content and soil salt distribution. Hydraulics characteristics for each type of MIS were also monitored. The results obtained show the usefulness of trickle irrigation system in olive trees growing where the trees height increased (cm) by 10 and 9.2%, stem diameter (mm) increased by 6 and 14%, shoots number per tree increased by 8 and 14%, leaves number per tree increased by 13 and 17%, shadow area (cm2) increased by 6 and 13% compared with bubbler and micro irrigation system respectively. Trickle irrigation systems demonstrate the highest values of sand soil moisture content which is about (18.19, 16.66 and 10.45% by weight) in the soil layers (00–30), (30-60) and (60-90) cm, respectively, whereas the bubbler irrigation systems were (16.66, 14.46 and 9.01% by weight) in the previous soil layers respectively, followed by mini-sprinkler irrigation systems treatment which were about (10.45, 9.01 and 6.58% by weight) in the same soil layers respectively. The olive trees root distribution under trickle irrigation showed more regularity than other types due to root distribution relative to the placement and the number of irrigation distributors. The net effect of trickle-irrigation was to increase water saving for producing one kilogram of olive fruits with 18 and 35 % less than with bubbler and mini-sprinkler respectively. The number of fruits increased under trickle irrigation by 16 to 24% while the olive tree yield (kg/tree) increased by 18 to 32% compared with bubbler and mini sprinkler irrigation system respectively. Trickle-irrigation can be recommended as an efficient irrigation system for olive trees in the irrigation areas of Wadi El Natrown in the west of the delta region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation increased olive tree height by 10% versus bubbler and 9.2% versus mini sprinkler.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeae2
Treatment
trickle irrigation systeme2
Outcome
trees heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10 and 9.2%e0
Comparator
bubbler and micro irrigation systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the trees height increased (cm) by 10 and 9.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2179–2225 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with bubbler and micro irrigation system respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2406–2469 · show in text ↑
e2

“usefulness of trickle irrigation system in olive trees growing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2110–2172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation increased olive stem diameter by 6% and 14% against the comparison systems.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeae2
Treatment
trickle irrigation systeme2
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6 and 14%e0
Comparator
bubbler and micro irrigation systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem diameter (mm) increased by 6 and 14%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2227–2268 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with bubbler and micro irrigation system respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2406–2469 · show in text ↑
e2

“usefulness of trickle irrigation system in olive trees growing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2110–2172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation increased shoots per olive tree by 8% and 14%.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeae2
Treatment
trickle irrigation systeme2
Outcome
shoots number per treee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8 and 14%e0
Comparator
bubbler and micro irrigation systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots number per tree increased by 8 and 14%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2270–2315 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with bubbler and micro irrigation system respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2406–2469 · show in text ↑
e2

“usefulness of trickle irrigation system in olive trees growing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2110–2172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation increased leaves per olive tree by 13% and 17%.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeae2
Treatment
trickle irrigation systeme2
Outcome
leaves number per treee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13 and 17%e0
Comparator
bubbler and micro irrigation systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaves number per tree increased by 13 and 17%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2317–2363 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with bubbler and micro irrigation system respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2406–2469 · show in text ↑
e2

“usefulness of trickle irrigation system in olive trees growing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2110–2172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation increased olive canopy shadow area by 6% and 13%.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeae2
Treatment
trickle irrigation systeme2
Outcome
shadow areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6 and 13%e0
Comparator
bubbler and micro irrigation systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shadow area (cm2) increased by 6 and 13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2365–2405 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with bubbler and micro irrigation system respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2406–2469 · show in text ↑
e2

“usefulness of trickle irrigation system in olive trees growing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2110–2172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation yielded the highest sandy soil moisture at three soil depths.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
Trickle irrigation systemse0
Outcome
sand soil moisture contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
18.19, 16.66 and 10.45% by weighte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trickle irrigation systems demonstrate the highest values of sand soil moisture content which is about (18.19, 16.66 and 10.45% by weight) in the soil layers (00–30), (30-60) and (60-90) cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2470–2673 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of MIS on olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–487 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bubbler irrigation gave soil moisture of 16.66, 14.46, and 9.01% by weight at three depths.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
bubbler irrigation systemse0
Outcome
sand soil moisture contente2
Value
16.66, 14.46 and 9.01% by weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the bubbler irrigation systems were (16.66, 14.46 and 9.01% by weight) in the previous soil layers respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2683–2794 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of MIS on olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–487 · show in text ↑
e2

“sand soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2531–2557 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mini sprinkler irrigation gave soil moisture of 10.45, 9.01, and 6.58% by weight at three depths.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeae1
Treatment
mini-sprinkler irrigation systems treatmente0
Outcome
sand soil moisture contente2
Value
10.45, 9.01 and 6.58% by weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mini-sprinkler irrigation systems treatment which were about (10.45, 9.01 and 6.58% by weight) in the same soil layers respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2808–2939 · show in text ↑
e1

“effect of MIS on olive trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–487 · show in text ↑
e2

“sand soil moisture content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2531–2557 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Olive root distribution was more regular under trickle irrigation than other systems.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeae0
Treatment
trickle irrigatione0
Outcome
root distributione0
Direction
more regularitye0
Comparator
other typese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The olive trees root distribution under trickle irrigation showed more regularity than other types due to root distribution relative to the placement and the number of irrigation distributors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2941–3133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation used 18% less water per kilogram of olives than bubbler irrigation.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
trickle-irrigatione0
Outcome
water saving for producing one kilogram of olive fruitse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
18e0
Comparator
bubblere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net effect of trickle-irrigation was to increase water saving for producing one kilogram of olive fruits with 18 and 35 % less than with bubbler and mini-sprinkler respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3134–3315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation used 35% less water per kilogram of olives than mini sprinkler irrigation.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae0
Treatment
trickle-irrigatione0
Outcome
water saving for producing one kilogram of olive fruitse0
Direction
lesse0
Value
35 %e0
Comparator
mini-sprinklere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The net effect of trickle-irrigation was to increase water saving for producing one kilogram of olive fruits with 18 and 35 % less than with bubbler and mini-sprinkler respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3134–3315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation increased fruit number by 16 to 24% versus bubbler and mini sprinkler.

Taxon
olive treeOlea europaeae0
Treatment
trickle irrigatione0
Outcome
number of fruitse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16 to 24%e0
Comparator
bubbler and mini sprinkler irrigation systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of fruits increased under trickle irrigation by 16 to 24% while the olive tree yield (kg/tree) increased by 18 to 32% compared with bubbler and mini sprinkler irrigation system respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3316–3517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation increased olive yield per tree by 18 to 32% versus bubbler and mini sprinkler.

Taxon
olive treeOlea europaeae0
Treatment
trickle irrigatione0
Outcome
yield (kg/tree)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18 to 32%e0
Comparator
bubbler and mini sprinkler irrigation systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of fruits increased under trickle irrigation by 16 to 24% while the olive tree yield (kg/tree) increased by 18 to 32% compared with bubbler and mini sprinkler irrigation system respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3316–3517 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Trickle irrigation is recommended for olive trees in Wadi El Natrown.

Taxon
olive treesOlea europaeae0
Treatment
Trickle-irrigatione0
Outcome
efficient irrigation systeme0
Setting
Wadi El Natrowne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trickle-irrigation can be recommended as an efficient irrigation system for olive trees in the irrigation areas of Wadi El Natrown in the west of the delta region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3518–3681 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

44 papers: 22 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

irrigation · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

53 papers: 26 positive, 27 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

irrigation · quality: grain · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.