Paper · 2020 · University writing server of the University of Hohenheim (Universität Hohenheim)

Photosynthesis, quantum requirements, and energy demand for crop production in controlled environments

Marc Schmierer

19
claims
39
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In this work, energy costs for LED (light emitting diodes) lighting of a virtual plant stand exhibiting C3photosynthesis have been calculated via a model considering the quantum demand to build-up dry matter and energy efficiency of state-of-the art LEDs. Optimistic and pessimistic scenarios have been calculated by taking into account uncertainties regarding the H+/ATP stoichiometry of photosynthesis and different management strategies for indoor plant production. Energy costs were between 265 and 606 kWh for a production cycle ranging over 100 days and resulting in 2500 g dry matter per square meter for the optimistic and the pessimistic scenario respectively. The conversion efficiencies from electrical energy to energy bound in phytomass at the end of the production cycle were 2.07 % and 4.72 % (pessimistic and optimistic scenario, respectively). This was lower than the theoretical maximum values calculated for C3 plants that are given as 9.5 % in the literature. However, when the losses that occur during the conversion from electrical energy to light energy were excluded and only the efficiency of the conversion from incident light energy to phyto-energy was calculated, values increased to 4.0 and 9.1 %. The differences between the optimistic and the pessimistic scenario was caused by decreased photorespiration via carbon dioxide fertilization, which increased the conversion efficiencies by 38 %, followed by different assumptions about the H+ requirement for ATP production (34 %) and an increased rate of active absorption of light energy (24 %). Considering cumulative as well as feedback effects of all of the mentioned parameters, the conversion efficiency in the optimistic scenario was 2.3 times higher than in the pessimistic scenario. A system for measuring gas-exchange of whole plants or plant stands was developed in order to be able to investigate and improve the above mentioned management strategies in the future. CO2 sensors and temperature and humidity sensors were used to detect water loss and CO2. Readily available off-the-shelf electronic and mechanical materials were used in order to build a low-cost system that can be used in high throughput experiments. The results indicate that around 90 % of the transpirational water was detected by the system. We conclude that parts of the transpirational water condensed on the surfaces thus not leaving the chamber. When checking the accuracy of the H2O and CO2 sensors using an industry quality infrared gas analyser (IRGA), we found significant deviations from the values given by the IRGA and used this data for calibration of the CO2 sensors. The responses of the CO2-sensors were also linearly coupled to the H2O concentrations (about -0.1 % ppm CO2 / ppm H2O). A regression analysis was performed and the coefficients were used to correct the sensor readings. Since LEDs exhibit a higher energy-to-light ratio when operated at lower light levels, we tested a very small growing gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotype in a climate chamber experiment under different illumination levels and different levels of nitrogen supply to assess its suitability for crop production in artificial environments. A 25 % reduction in illumination lead to a 75 % reduction in yield, mainly due to a 60 % reduction in formed tillers and 20 % reduction in kernel weight, and an 80 % reduction in illumination caused total yield loss. Whereas leaf area under reduced illumination was significantly lower, only marginal changes in the dimensions of single leaves were observed. Photosynthesis at growing light conditions was not different between control plants and plants under 75 % illumination. This was explained by a higher photochemical efficiency under lower light conditions and a reduced mesophyll resistance. Therefore, we conclude that this genotype is an interesting candidate for crop production in vertical plant production systems, especially because of its short stature and the absence of shade avoidance mechanisms, such as leaf elongation, that would complicate production in small-height growing racks under low-light conditions. Nitrogen concentrations of 2.8 and 1.4 mmol L-1 in the nutrient solution lead to no differences in plant growth. We conclude that a nitrogen concentration of 1.4 mmol L-1 is sufficient for this genotype under the light intensities that were applied here. A software tool for simulations of photosynthesis in the python programming language was developed. The software implements a classical Farquhar-von CaemmererBerry (FvCB) model of leaf photosynthesis coupled with a model for the estimation of stomatal behaviour dependent on environmental conditions. We want to emphasize that the use of such models is essential to understand the complex interactions between plant growth, leaf photosynthesis and the environment. Knowledge on those relationships is the key to improve the efficiency of plant production in controlled environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Energy costs for LED lighting of the virtual plant stand were 265 to 606 kWh per production cycle, for the optimistic and pessimistic scenarios respectively.

Taxon
virtual plant stande0
Outcome
Energy costse1
Value
265 and 606 kWhe1
Qualifier
optimistic and the pessimistic scenarioe1

Verbatim

e0

“energy costs for LED (light emitting diodes) lighting of a virtual plant stand exhibiting C3photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–120 · show in text ↑
e1

“Energy costs were between 265 and 606 kWh for a production cycle ranging over 100 days and resulting in 2500 g dry matter per square meter for the optimistic and the pessimistic scenario respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–668 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Conversion efficiencies from electrical energy to phytomass energy were 2.07 % and 4.72 % in the pessimistic and optimistic scenarios.

Taxon
virtual plant stande0
Outcome
conversion efficiencies from electrical energy to energy bound in phytomasse2
Value
2.07 % and 4.72 %e2
Qualifier
pessimistic and optimistic scenario, respectivelye2

Verbatim

e0

“energy costs for LED (light emitting diodes) lighting of a virtual plant stand exhibiting C3photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–120 · show in text ↑
e2

“The conversion efficiencies from electrical energy to energy bound in phytomass at the end of the production cycle were 2.07 % and 4.72 % (pessimistic and optimistic scenario, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon dioxide fertilization, via decreased photorespiration, increased the conversion efficiencies by 38 %.

Taxon
virtual plant stande0
Treatment
carbon dioxide fertilizatione3
Outcome
conversion efficienciese3
Direction
increasede3
Value
38 %e3
Qualifier
decreased photorespiratione3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“energy costs for LED (light emitting diodes) lighting of a virtual plant stand exhibiting C3photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“decreased photorespiration via carbon dioxide fertilization, which increased the conversion efficiencies by 38 %, followed by different assumptions about the H+ requirement for ATP production (34 %) and an increased rate of active absorption of light energy (24 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1573 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Different assumptions about the H+ requirement for ATP production changed the conversion efficiencies by 34 % in the scenario comparison.

Taxon
virtual plant stande0
Outcome
conversion efficienciese3
Value
34 %e3
Qualifier
different assumptions about the H+ requirement for ATP productione3

Verbatim

e0

“energy costs for LED (light emitting diodes) lighting of a virtual plant stand exhibiting C3photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“decreased photorespiration via carbon dioxide fertilization, which increased the conversion efficiencies by 38 %, followed by different assumptions about the H+ requirement for ATP production (34 %) and an increased rate of active absorption of light energy (24 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1573 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

An increased rate of active absorption of light energy changed the conversion efficiencies by 24 % in the scenario comparison.

Taxon
virtual plant stande0
Outcome
conversion efficienciese3
Value
24 %e3
Qualifier
an increased rate of active absorption of light energye3

Verbatim

e0

“energy costs for LED (light emitting diodes) lighting of a virtual plant stand exhibiting C3photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–120 · show in text ↑
e3

“decreased photorespiration via carbon dioxide fertilization, which increased the conversion efficiencies by 38 %, followed by different assumptions about the H+ requirement for ATP production (34 %) and an increased rate of active absorption of light energy (24 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1573 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

With cumulative and feedback effects considered, the conversion efficiency in the optimistic scenario was 2.3 times higher than in the pessimistic scenario.

Taxon
virtual plant stande0
Outcome
conversion efficiency in the optimistic scenarioe5
Direction
highere5
Value
2.3 timese5
Comparator
pessimistic scenarioe5

Verbatim

e0

“energy costs for LED (light emitting diodes) lighting of a virtual plant stand exhibiting C3photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–120 · show in text ↑
e5

“the conversion efficiency in the optimistic scenario was 2.3 times higher than in the pessimistic scenario”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1768 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25 % reduction in illumination reduced rice yield by 75 %.

Material
gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotypee7
Treatment
25 % reduction in illuminatione6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
reductione6
Value
75 %e6
Setting
climate chamber experimente7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“we tested a very small growing gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotype in a climate chamber experiment under different illumination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3099 · show in text ↑
e6

“A 25 % reduction in illumination lead to a 75 % reduction in yield, mainly due to a 60 % reduction in formed tillers and 20 % reduction in kernel weight, and an 80 % reduction in illumination caused total yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3214–3429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25 % reduction in illumination reduced formed tillers of rice by 60 %.

Treatment
25 % reduction in illuminatione6
Outcome
formed tillerse6
Direction
reductione6
Value
60 %e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“we tested a very small growing gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotype in a climate chamber experiment under different illumination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3099 · show in text ↑
e6

“A 25 % reduction in illumination lead to a 75 % reduction in yield, mainly due to a 60 % reduction in formed tillers and 20 % reduction in kernel weight, and an 80 % reduction in illumination caused total yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3214–3429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 25 % reduction in illumination reduced rice kernel weight by 20 %.

Treatment
25 % reduction in illuminatione6
Outcome
kernel weighte6
Direction
reductione6
Value
20 %e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“we tested a very small growing gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotype in a climate chamber experiment under different illumination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3099 · show in text ↑
e6

“A 25 % reduction in illumination lead to a 75 % reduction in yield, mainly due to a 60 % reduction in formed tillers and 20 % reduction in kernel weight, and an 80 % reduction in illumination caused total yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3214–3429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An 80 % reduction in illumination caused total yield loss of rice.

Treatment
80 % reduction in illuminatione6
Outcome
total yield losse6
Direction
decreaseinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“we tested a very small growing gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotype in a climate chamber experiment under different illumination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3099 · show in text ↑
e6

“A 25 % reduction in illumination lead to a 75 % reduction in yield, mainly due to a 60 % reduction in formed tillers and 20 % reduction in kernel weight, and an 80 % reduction in illumination caused total yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3214–3429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under reduced illumination, rice leaf area was significantly lower.

Treatment
reduced illuminatione4
Outcome
leaf areae4
Direction
significantly lowere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“we tested a very small growing gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotype in a climate chamber experiment under different illumination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3099 · show in text ↑
e4

“Whereas leaf area under reduced illumination was significantly lower, only marginal changes in the dimensions of single leaves were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3431–3571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under reduced illumination, the dimensions of single rice leaves showed only marginal changes.

Treatment
reduced illuminatione4
Outcome
dimensions of single leavese4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“we tested a very small growing gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotype in a climate chamber experiment under different illumination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3099 · show in text ↑
e4

“Whereas leaf area under reduced illumination was significantly lower, only marginal changes in the dimensions of single leaves were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3431–3571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis at growing light conditions was not different between control rice plants and plants under 75 % illumination.

Treatment
75 % illuminatione4
Outcome
Photosynthesis at growing light conditionse4
Direction
not differente4
Comparator
control plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“we tested a very small growing gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotype in a climate chamber experiment under different illumination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3099 · show in text ↑
e4

“Photosynthesis at growing light conditions was not different between control plants and plants under 75 % illumination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3573–3691 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors explain the unchanged photosynthesis under low light by a higher photochemical efficiency and a reduced mesophyll resistance.

Outcome
Photosynthesis at growing light conditionse4
Qualifier
a higher photochemical efficiency under lower light conditions and a reduced mesophyll resistancee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“we tested a very small growing gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotype in a climate chamber experiment under different illumination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3099 · show in text ↑
e4

“Photosynthesis at growing light conditions was not different between control plants and plants under 75 % illumination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3573–3691 · show in text ↑
e3

“This was explained by a higher photochemical efficiency under lower light conditions and a reduced mesophyll resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3693–3812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen concentrations of 2.8 and 1.4 mmol L-1 gave no differences in rice plant growth.

Treatment
Nitrogen concentrations of 2.8 and 1.4 mmol L-1e4
Outcome
plant growthe4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“we tested a very small growing gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotype in a climate chamber experiment under different illumination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3099 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen concentrations of 2.8 and 1.4 mmol L-1 in the nutrient solution lead to no differences in plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4145–4256 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 1.4 mmol L-1 nitrogen is sufficient for this rice genotype at the light intensities applied.

Outcome
a nitrogen concentration of 1.4 mmol L-1 is sufficiente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“we tested a very small growing gibberellin (GA) deficient super dwarf rice genotype in a climate chamber experiment under different illumination levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2948–3099 · show in text ↑
e4

“We conclude that a nitrogen concentration of 1.4 mmol L-1 is sufficient for this genotype under the light intensities that were applied here”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4258–4398 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The gas-exchange system detected around 90 % of the transpirational water.

Taxon
plant standse6
Outcome
transpirational water was detected by the systeme5
Value
around 90 %e5

Verbatim

e6

“A system for measuring gas-exchange of whole plants or plant stands was developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1851 · show in text ↑
e5

“The results indicate that around 90 % of the transpirational water was detected by the system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2208–2301 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The H2O and CO2 sensors of the gas-exchange system showed significant deviations from the values of an infrared gas analyser.

Taxon
plant standse6
Outcome
deviations from the values given by the IRGAe5
Comparator
industry quality infrared gas analyser (IRGA)e5

Verbatim

e6

“A system for measuring gas-exchange of whole plants or plant stands was developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1851 · show in text ↑
e5

“When checking the accuracy of the H2O and CO2 sensors using an industry quality infrared gas analyser (IRGA), we found significant deviations from the values given by the IRGA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2411–2586 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The CO2 sensor responses were linearly coupled to H2O concentrations, at about -0.1 % ppm CO2 per ppm H2O.

Taxon
plant standse6
Treatment
H2O concentrationse5
Outcome
responses of the CO2-sensorse5
Value
-0.1 % ppm CO2 / ppm H2Oe5

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e6

“A system for measuring gas-exchange of whole plants or plant stands was developed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1851 · show in text ↑
e5

“The responses of the CO2-sensors were also linearly coupled to the H2O concentrations (about -0.1 % ppm CO2 / ppm H2O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2642–2760 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

47 papers: 24 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

light · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

68 papers: 36 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

light · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 55 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.