Paper · 2020 · Water

Effects of Combined High Temperature and Waterlogging Stress at Booting Stage on Root Anatomy of Rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Bo Zhen; Huizhen Li; Qinglin Niu; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In recent years, the alternating occurrence of high temperature and waterlogging disasters in South China has seriously reduced the yield of single cropping rice. Studying the changes in anatomical structure of the rice root system could provide theoretical basis for understanding the mechanisms of high temperature and waterlogging stress. To examine interactions between temperature and waterlogging stress, an experiment was set up in a growth chamber consisting of two temperatures (moderate, 30–34 °C and high, 35–38 °C) with three depths of flooding (0–5, 10 and 15 cm). Treatments commenced at the booting stage and lasted five days, after which all treatments were returned to a 0–5 cm flooding depth and the same temperature regime. Observations were made immediately after cessation of treatments, then after 5, 10 and 20 d to test the effect of treatments on subsequent root anatomical development. The low-stress control (0–5 cm, medium temperature) showed no change with time in aerenchyma area, thickness of the outer root, stele diameter, and the number nor diameter of xylem vessels. Root diameter and stele diameter under the high-stress control (0–5 cm, high temperature) were decreased by 29.09% and 15.28%, respectively, at the booting stage, whereas the high stress control (15 cm, high temperature) affected only the vessel diameter, reducing it by 14.11% compared with that in the low-stress control (0–5 cm, medium temperature). Compared to the high-stress control (0–5 cm, high temperature), the interaction of high temperature and waterlogging stress alleviated the inhibiting effect of the changes in the root system, especially after the end of the stress. We thought that waterlogging could reduce the damage of high temperature on rice root growth. Low water depth waterlogging has little effect on rice root system and aerenchyma area root diameter at 0, 5, 10 and 20 d after the stress ended, and the thickness of the outer root, stele diameter and the number and diameter of vessels at 0 d under M15 (15 cm, medium temperature) had no significant difference compared with M5 (0–5 cm, medium temperature). However, the increase in rice root diameter, stele diameter, thickness of the outer root cortex depth and vessel diameter were inhibited under high temperature stress at the booting stage. Root diameter and stele diameter under H5 (0–5 cm, high temperature) were decreased by 29.09% and 15.28%, respectively, at the booting stage, whereas H15 (15 cm, high temperature) affected only the vessel diameter, reducing it by 14.11% compared with that in the M5. Compared to H5, the interaction of high temperature and waterlogging stress alleviated the inhibiting effect of the changes in the root system, especially after the end of the stress. We thought that waterlogging could lighten the damage of high temperature on rice root growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice root diameter decreased by 29.09% under high temperature and shallow flooding.

Organ / stage
booting stagee0
Treatment
H5 (0–5 cm, high temperature)e0
Outcome
Root diametere0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
29.09%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root diameter and stele diameter under H5 (0–5 cm, high temperature) were decreased by 29.09% and 15.28%, respectively, at the booting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2328–2468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice stele diameter decreased by 15.28% under high temperature and shallow flooding.

Treatment
H5 (0–5 cm, high temperature)e0
Outcome
stele diametere0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
15.28%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Root diameter and stele diameter under H5 (0–5 cm, high temperature) were decreased by 29.09% and 15.28%, respectively, at the booting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2328–2468 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature with 15 cm flooding reduced vessel diameter by 14.11% versus shallow flooding at medium temperature.

Treatment
H15 (15 cm, high temperature)e0
Outcome
vessel diametere0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
14.11%e0
Comparator
M5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“H15 (15 cm, high temperature) affected only the vessel diameter, reducing it by 14.11% compared with that in the M5”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2478–2593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined heat and waterlogging alleviated inhibition of rice root system changes compared with shallow flooding under heat, especially after stress ended.

Treatment
interaction of high temperature and waterlogging stresse0
Outcome
changes in the root systeme0
Direction
alleviatede0
Qualifier
especially after the end of the stresse0
Comparator
H5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared to H5, the interaction of high temperature and waterlogging stress alleviated the inhibiting effect of the changes in the root system, especially after the end of the stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2595–2777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice root diameter, outer cortex thickness, stele diameter and vessel diameter increases were inhibited by high temperature at booting.

Organ / stage
booting stagee0
Treatment
high temperature stresse0
Outcome
root diameter, stele diameter, thickness of the outer root cortex depth and vessel diametere0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“the increase in rice root diameter, stele diameter, thickness of the outer root cortex depth and vessel diameter were inhibited under high temperature stress at the booting stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2148–2326 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The low-stress control showed no temporal change in measured rice root anatomical traits.

Treatment
low-stress control (0–5 cm, medium temperature)e0
Outcome
aerenchyma area, thickness of the outer root, stele diameter, and the number nor diameter of xylem vesselse0
Direction
no changee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“The low-stress control (0–5 cm, medium temperature) showed no change with time in aerenchyma area, thickness of the outer root, stele diameter, and the number nor diameter of xylem vessels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1099 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred that waterlogging can lessen heat damage to rice root growth.

Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
damage of high temperature on rice root growthe0
Direction
lightene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
e0

“We thought that waterlogging could lighten the damage of high temperature on rice root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2779–2872 · show in text ↑

heat · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 46 positive, 61 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

flooding · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

138 papers: 64 positive, 74 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

134 papers more in this group

See all 138 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.