Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Tree Growth and Yield of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cv. Kandhari

Chahat Thakur; C.L. Sharma

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) belongs to the family Punicaceae and it is one of the favourite table fruits in the world, due to its refreshing juice with nutritional and medicinal properties. It is obvious that changes in the level of endogenous hormones due to biotic and abiotic stress alter the crop growth and any sort of manipulation including exogenous application of growth substances would help for yield improvement. So, an investigation was carried out in the Pomegranate Block of Model farm of Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni, Solan (H.P), India during the year 2016 and 2017. The pomegranate trees cv. Kandhari under investigation were subjected to foliar spray of plant growth regulators viz. NAA, GA3, 6-BA, their combination and control at different concentrations. The study was conducted to determine the effect of plant growth regulators on tree growth and yield. On the basis of results obtained in the present investigation it is concluded that plant growth regulators and nutrients application revealed that NAA 30ppm (May) followed by GA3 75ppm (June) and 6-BA (May) was proved to be most effective as it improved the growth and increased yield of pomegranate. While from economic point of view also NAA was superior to GA3 and 6-BA because of its higher net returns and lower cost when compared with other two growth regulators.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA followed by GA3 and 6-BA improved pomegranate growth.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
NAA 30ppm (May) followed by GA3 75ppm (June) and 6-BA (May)e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA 30ppm (May) followed by GA3 75ppm (June) and 6-BA (May) was proved to be most effective as it improved the growth and increased yield of pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA followed by GA3 and 6-BA increased pomegranate yield.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
NAA 30ppm (May) followed by GA3 75ppm (June) and 6-BA (May)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAA 30ppm (May) followed by GA3 75ppm (June) and 6-BA (May) was proved to be most effective as it improved the growth and increased yield of pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1212 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA had higher net returns than GA3 and 6-BA.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
GA3 and 6-BAe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“NAA was superior to GA3 and 6-BA because of its higher net returns and lower cost when compared with other two growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1381 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA had lower cost than GA3 and 6-BA.

Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
coste0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
GA3 and 6-BAe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“NAA was superior to GA3 and 6-BA because of its higher net returns and lower cost when compared with other two growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1381 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

N-benzyladenine · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.