Paper · 2020 · Plants

Evaluating the Contribution of Growth, Physiological, and Ionic Components Towards Salinity and Drought Stress Tolerance in Jatropha curcas

Muhammad Mohsin Abrar; Muhammad Saqib; Ghulam Abbas; et al.

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
65
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Salinity and drought stress, singly or in combination, are major environmental menaces. Jatropha curcas L. is a biodiesel plant that can tolerate long periods of drought. However, the growth performance and stress tolerance based on physical, chemical, and physiological attributes of this plant have not yet been studied. To address this question, J. curcas seedlings were grown in a completely randomized design in plastic pots filled with soil to evaluate the effects of salinity and drought stresses on growth, ionic composition, and physiological attributes. The experiment consisted of six treatments: control (without salinity and drought stress), salinity alone (7.5 dS m−1, 15 dS m−1), drought, and a combination of salinity and drought (7.5 dS m−1+ Drought, 15 dS m−1+Drought). Our results revealed that, compared with the control, both plant height (PH) and stem diameter (SD) were reduced by (83%, 80%, and 77%) and (69%, 56%, and 55%) under salinity and drought combination (15 dS m−1+Drought) after three, six, and nine months, respectively. There was 93% more leaf Na+ found in plants treated with 15 dS m−1+Drought compared with the control. The highest significant average membrane stability index (MSI) and relative water content (RWC) values (81% and 85%, respectively) were found in the control. The MSI and RWC were not influenced by 7.5 dS m−1 and drought treatments and mostly contributed towards stress tolerance. Our findings imply that J. curcas is moderately tolerant to salinity and drought. The Na+ toxicity and disturbance in K+: Na+ ratio were the main contributing factors for limited growth and physiological attributes in this plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under combined salinity and drought (15 dS m−1+Drought), plant height of Jatropha curcas was reduced compared with the control by 83%, 80% and 77% after three, six and nine months.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
salinity and drought combination (15 dS m−1+Drought)e2
Outcome
plant height (PH)e1
Direction
reducede1
Value
83%, 80%, and 77%e1
Qualifier
after three, six, and nine monthse2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the control, both plant height (PH) and stem diameter (SD) were reduced by (83%, 80%, and 77%) and (69%, 56%, and 55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–947 · show in text ↑
e2

“under salinity and drought combination (15 dS m−1+Drought) after three, six, and nine months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under combined salinity and drought (15 dS m−1+Drought), stem diameter of Jatropha curcas was reduced compared with the control by 69%, 56% and 55% after three, six and nine months.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
salinity and drought combination (15 dS m−1+Drought)e2
Outcome
stem diameter (SD)e1
Direction
reducede1
Value
69%, 56%, and 55%e1
Qualifier
after three, six, and nine monthse2
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–139 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with the control, both plant height (PH) and stem diameter (SD) were reduced by (83%, 80%, and 77%) and (69%, 56%, and 55%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–947 · show in text ↑
e2

“under salinity and drought combination (15 dS m−1+Drought) after three, six, and nine months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants treated with 15 dS m−1+Drought had 93% more leaf Na+ than the control.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
15 dS m−1+Droughte3
Outcome
leaf Na+e3
Direction
moree3
Value
93%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–139 · show in text ↑
e3

“There was 93% more leaf Na+ found in plants treated with 15 dS m−1+Drought compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1156 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Membrane stability index (MSI) of Jatropha curcas was highest in the control, at 81%.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Outcome
membrane stability index (MSI)e4
Direction
higheste4
Value
81%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–139 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest significant average membrane stability index (MSI) and relative water content (RWC) values (81% and 85%, respectively) were found in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1314 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content (RWC) of Jatropha curcas was highest in the control, at 85%.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Outcome
relative water content (RWC)e4
Direction
higheste4
Value
85%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–139 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest significant average membrane stability index (MSI) and relative water content (RWC) values (81% and 85%, respectively) were found in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MSI and RWC of Jatropha curcas were not influenced by 7.5 dS m−1 and drought treatments.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
7.5 dS m−1 and drought treatmentse6
Outcome
MSI and RWCe6
Direction
not influencede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–139 · show in text ↑
e6

“The MSI and RWC were not influenced by 7.5 dS m−1 and drought treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1388 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na+ toxicity and disturbance in the K+: Na+ ratio were the main factors limiting growth and physiological attributes of Jatropha curcas.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Compound
Na+e7
Outcome
limited growth and physiological attributese7
Qualifier
disturbance in K+: Na+ ratioe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–139 · show in text ↑
e7

“The Na+ toxicity and disturbance in K+: Na+ ratio were the main contributing factors for limited growth and physiological attributes in this plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1666 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Jatropha curcas is moderately tolerant to salinity and drought.

Taxon
J. curcasJatropha curcase7
Outcome
moderately tolerant to salinity and droughte7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 124–139 · show in text ↑
e7

“Our findings imply that J. curcas is moderately tolerant to salinity and drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1518 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: oxidative · Jatropha curcasPositive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · growth · Jatropha curcasPositive and negative results

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

drought · physiology: ion balance · Jatropha curcasResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

salinity · growth · Jatropha curcasResults agree

16 papers: 0 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.