Paper · 2020 · Advances in Agriculture

Growth and Yield Responses of Cowpea and Groundnut to Five Rhizobial Inoculant Strains in the Guinea Savanna Zone of Ghana

F. Mintah; Y. Z. Mohammed; S. Lamptey; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Inoculating groundnut and cowpea with highly effective and competitive rhizobial strain improves nodulation. A field experiment was carried out at the experimental field of the Faculty of Agriculture, University for Development Studies, Nyankpala, to evaluate the growth and yield responses of cowpea and groundnut to five rhizobial inoculant strains in the Guinea Savanna zone. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with eight (8) treatments replicated four (4) times. The treatments included five rhizobial inoculant strains (NC 92, KNUST 1002, KNUST 1003, KNUST 1006, and BR 3267), two N fertilizer levels (20 kg·N/ha and 40 kg·N/ha), and a control. The results showed that rhizobial inoculation and N fertilizer application increased nodulation, biomass yield, pod number, pod weight, hundred seed weight, nodule dry weight, and pod yield of groundnut compared with the control. Rhizobial inoculation averagely increased the nodulation and yield by 63 and 67%, respectively, compared with the control. Mineral N fertilizer (20 kg N/ha) on average increased the nodulation and yield by 24 and 25%, respectively, compared with the control plots. It can be recommended from this study that, in the absence of highly competitive rhizobial strains such as KNUST 1006 and NC 92 as biofertilizers for increasing the nodulation and yield of cowpea and groundnut, 20 kg·N/ha can be used for the purpose. Further research is recommended using these rhizobial strains in combination with lower rates of N fertilizers (<20 kg·ha−1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial inoculation increased nodulation and biomass yield and pod number of groundnut compared with the control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
rhizobial inoculatione1
Interactor
rhizobiale1symbiont
Outcome
nodulation, biomass yield, pod numbere1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
Guinea Savanna Zone of Ghanat1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rhizobial inoculation and N fertilizer application increased nodulation, biomass yield, pod number, pod weight, hundred seed weight, nodule dry weight, and pod yield of groundnut compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–916 · show in text ↑
t1

“in the Guinea Savanna Zone of Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial inoculation increased pod weight, hundred seed weight and nodule dry weight of groundnut compared with the control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
rhizobial inoculatione1
Interactor
rhizobiale1symbiont
Outcome
pod weight, hundred seed weight, nodule dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
Guinea Savanna Zone of Ghanat1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rhizobial inoculation and N fertilizer application increased nodulation, biomass yield, pod number, pod weight, hundred seed weight, nodule dry weight, and pod yield of groundnut compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–916 · show in text ↑
t1

“in the Guinea Savanna Zone of Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial inoculation increased pod yield of groundnut compared with the control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
Treatment
rhizobial inoculatione1
Interactor
rhizobiale1symbiont
Outcome
pod yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
Guinea Savanna Zone of Ghanat1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“rhizobial inoculation and N fertilizer application increased nodulation, biomass yield, pod number, pod weight, hundred seed weight, nodule dry weight, and pod yield of groundnut compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–916 · show in text ↑
t1

“in the Guinea Savanna Zone of Ghana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial inoculation increased nodulation of cowpea and groundnut by 63% on average compared with the control.

Taxon
cowpea and groundnutArachis hypogaeaVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Rhizobial inoculatione2
Interactor
rhizobiale2symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione2
Direction
increasede2
Value
63e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Rhizobial inoculation averagely increased the nodulation and yield by 63 and 67%, respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Yield Responses of Cowpea and Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobial inoculation increased yield of cowpea and groundnut by 67% on average compared with the control.

Taxon
cowpea and groundnutArachis hypogaeaVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Rhizobial inoculatione2
Interactor
rhizobiale2symbiont
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
67%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Rhizobial inoculation averagely increased the nodulation and yield by 63 and 67%, respectively, compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Yield Responses of Cowpea and Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral N fertilizer at 20 kg N/ha increased nodulation of cowpea and groundnut by 24% on average compared with the control plots.

Taxon
cowpea and groundnutArachis hypogaeaVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Mineral N fertilizer (20 kg N/ha)e3
Outcome
nodulatione3
Direction
increasede3
Value
24e3
Comparator
control plotse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Mineral N fertilizer (20 kg N/ha) on average increased the nodulation and yield by 24 and 25%, respectively, compared with the control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Yield Responses of Cowpea and Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral N fertilizer at 20 kg N/ha increased yield of cowpea and groundnut by 25% on average compared with the control plots.

Taxon
cowpea and groundnutArachis hypogaeaVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Mineral N fertilizer (20 kg N/ha)e3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
25%e3
Comparator
control plotse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Mineral N fertilizer (20 kg N/ha) on average increased the nodulation and yield by 24 and 25%, respectively, compared with the control plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Yield Responses of Cowpea and Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Where competitive rhizobial strains are absent, 20 kg N/ha can be used for cowpea and groundnut as a substitute for biofertilizers.

Taxon
cowpea and groundnutArachis hypogaeaVigna unguiculatat0
Outcome
20 kg·N/ha can be used for the purposee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“in the absence of highly competitive rhizobial strains such as KNUST 1006 and NC 92 as biofertilizers for increasing the nodulation and yield of cowpea and groundnut, 20 kg·N/ha can be used for the purpose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1432 · show in text ↑
t0

“Growth and Yield Responses of Cowpea and Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

29 papers: 17 positive, 12 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

68 papers: 62 positive, 6 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

69 papers: 57 positive, 12 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

145 papers: 125 positive, 20 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

nitrogen · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 66 positive, 6 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.