Paper · 2020 · Vestnik of Ulyanovsk state agricultural academy

PRODUCTIVITY OF CORN HYBRIDS FOR GRAIN DEPENDING ON CULTIVATION METHODS IN THE CONDITIONS OF THE VOLGA FOREST-STEPPE ZONE

FSBEI HE Ulyanovsk SAU; А.L. Toigildin; М.I. Podsevalov; et al.

11
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The article presents the results of evaluating the productivity of corn hybrids for grain with different vegetation periods, depending on the method of protecting plants from contamination and the level of mineral nutrition on leached сhernozem of the Volga forest-steppe zone. Studies conducted during 2017- 2019 showed that the early-maturing hybrids of Gitago maize FAO 200 and the phenomenon of FAO 220 fully realized their potential and provided yield of 8.31 and 8.55 t / ha of grain. These hybrids are characterized by a higher collection of raw protein, the output of exchange energy and feed units in comparison with the hybrids Talisman FAO 180 and Novatop FAO 240. Systems of crop protection from weeds had an impact on both the yield and productivity of corn, which is explained by the different effectiveness of inter-row processing and herbicide in protecting plants from weeds. Thus, when inter-row processing was used, the number of weeds in hybrids averaged 8.4 PCs/m2 , while when applying herbicide, it decreased to 5.1 pcs/m2 , a similar pattern was found when assessing the air-dry mass of weeds, which was 65, 2 g/m2 and 27.5 g / m2 , respectively. On average, the corn grain yield in hybrids increased by 0.92 t/ha when applying herbicide compared to mechanical tillage. The use of leaf fertilizing during the growing season with Izagri Azot and Izagri Zn preparations led to an increase in the yield of corn hybrids: Talisman by 0.57 t/ha, Gitago by 0.48, Phenomenon by 0.81 and Novotop by 0.44 t/ha of grain, as well as an increase in protein collection, exchange energy and feed units when using leaf fertilizing

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gitago maize FAO 200 yielded 8.31 grain.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
Gitago maize FAO 200e0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
8.31e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Studies conducted during 2017- 2019 showed that the early-maturing hybrids of Gitago maize FAO 200 and the phenomenon of FAO 220 fully realized their potential and provided yield of 8.31 and 8.55 t / ha of grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–490 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

phenomenon of FAO 220 yielded 8.55 t / ha grain.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
phenomenon of FAO 220e0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
8.55 t / hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Studies conducted during 2017- 2019 showed that the early-maturing hybrids of Gitago maize FAO 200 and the phenomenon of FAO 220 fully realized their potential and provided yield of 8.31 and 8.55 t / ha of grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–490 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two early hybrids had higher raw protein collection, exchange energy and feed units than Talisman and Novatop.

Material
These hybridse0
Outcome
collection of raw protein, the output of exchange energy and feed unitse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Talisman FAO 180 and Novatop FAO 240e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These hybrids are characterized by a higher collection of raw protein, the output of exchange energy and feed units in comparison with the hybrids Talisman FAO 180 and Novatop FAO 240.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–675 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide reduced weed number from 8.4 to 5.1 per square metre relative to inter-row processing.

Treatment
applying herbicidee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number of weedse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
5.1 pcs/m2e0
Qualifier
8.4 PCs/m2e0
Comparator
inter-row processinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, when inter-row processing was used, the number of weeds in hybrids averaged 8.4 PCs/m2 , while when applying herbicide, it decreased to 5.1 pcs/m2 , a similar pattern was found when assessing the air-dry mass of weeds, which was 65, 2 g/m2 and 27.5 g / m2 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide reduced weed air-dry mass relative to inter-row processing.

Treatment
applying herbicidee0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
air-dry mass of weedse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
27.5 g / m2e0
Qualifier
65, 2 g/m2e0
Comparator
inter-row processinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, when inter-row processing was used, the number of weeds in hybrids averaged 8.4 PCs/m2 , while when applying herbicide, it decreased to 5.1 pcs/m2 , a similar pattern was found when assessing the air-dry mass of weeds, which was 65, 2 g/m2 and 27.5 g / m2 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“CORN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide increased average corn grain yield by 0.92 t/ha versus mechanical tillage.

Treatment
applying herbicidee0
Outcome
corn grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.92 t/hae0
Comparator
mechanical tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On average, the corn grain yield in hybrids increased by 0.92 t/ha when applying herbicide compared to mechanical tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf fertilizing increased Talisman grain yield by 0.57 t/ha.

Material
Talismane0
Treatment
leaf fertilizing during the growing season with Izagri Azot and Izagri Zn preparationse0
Outcome
yield of corn hybridse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.57 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of leaf fertilizing during the growing season with Izagri Azot and Izagri Zn preparations led to an increase in the yield of corn hybrids: Talisman by 0.57 t/ha, Gitago by 0.48, Phenomenon by 0.81 and Novotop by 0.44 t/ha of grain, as well as an increase in protein collection, exchange energy and feed units when using leaf fertilizing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf fertilizing increased Gitago grain yield by 0.48.

Material
Gitagoe0
Treatment
leaf fertilizing during the growing season with Izagri Azot and Izagri Zn preparationse0
Outcome
yield of corn hybridse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.48e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of leaf fertilizing during the growing season with Izagri Azot and Izagri Zn preparations led to an increase in the yield of corn hybrids: Talisman by 0.57 t/ha, Gitago by 0.48, Phenomenon by 0.81 and Novotop by 0.44 t/ha of grain, as well as an increase in protein collection, exchange energy and feed units when using leaf fertilizing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf fertilizing increased Phenomenon grain yield by 0.81.

Material
Phenomenone0
Treatment
leaf fertilizing during the growing season with Izagri Azot and Izagri Zn preparationse0
Outcome
yield of corn hybridse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.81e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of leaf fertilizing during the growing season with Izagri Azot and Izagri Zn preparations led to an increase in the yield of corn hybrids: Talisman by 0.57 t/ha, Gitago by 0.48, Phenomenon by 0.81 and Novotop by 0.44 t/ha of grain, as well as an increase in protein collection, exchange energy and feed units when using leaf fertilizing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf fertilizing increased Novotop grain yield by 0.44 t/ha.

Material
Novotope0
Treatment
leaf fertilizing during the growing season with Izagri Azot and Izagri Zn preparationse0
Outcome
yield of corn hybridse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.44 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of leaf fertilizing during the growing season with Izagri Azot and Izagri Zn preparations led to an increase in the yield of corn hybrids: Talisman by 0.57 t/ha, Gitago by 0.48, Phenomenon by 0.81 and Novotop by 0.44 t/ha of grain, as well as an increase in protein collection, exchange energy and feed units when using leaf fertilizing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf fertilizing increased protein collection, exchange energy and feed units.

Treatment
leaf fertilizinge0
Outcome
protein collection, exchange energy and feed unitse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of leaf fertilizing during the growing season with Izagri Azot and Izagri Zn preparations led to an increase in the yield of corn hybrids: Talisman by 0.57 t/ha, Gitago by 0.48, Phenomenon by 0.81 and Novotop by 0.44 t/ha of grain, as well as an increase in protein collection, exchange energy and feed units when using leaf fertilizing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1638 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

climate site · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

180 papers: 102 positive, 78 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

176 papers more in this group

See all 180 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 236 positive, 26 negative or no effect

235 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.