Paper · 2021 · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)

A raw data relative to each experimental repeat of Agronomic traits, Grain quality traits and Grain micronutrient content as influenced by seeding rate, variety and micronutrients

Melash, Anteneh Agezew

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This field experiment was conducted Split-split plot design was applied. Two durum wheat varieties were assigned to the main plot, micronutrient to the subplots, and seeding rates to the sub-sub plots. The two durum wheat varieties were sown under four levels of seeding rate (100, 125, 150, and 175 kg ha-1). Micronutrients (ZnSO4 and FeSO4) were supplied during the early grain filling stage both at a rate of 25 kg ha-1. The result showed that an increase in the seeding rate up to 175 kg ha-1 caused a significant (P = 0.05) grain yield improvement by about 23.5% and biomass by 21.5%. However, except plant height, most of the yield components like thousand-grain weight, seeds spike-1, spike length, and a number of seeds spike-1 significantly (P = 0.05) decreased markedly with increasing in the seeding rate. The grain qualitative traits such as grain protein content, gluten content, and Zeleny index decreased with the seeding rate increased. The response of the tested varieties was different from the changing seeding rate. Foliar application of FeSO4 has significantly ameliorated grain quality traits. In a dryland environment, the grain protein content was significantly higher than in a wet environment. The study inferred that a higher seeding rate (175 kg ha-1) increased both biomass and grain yield. Optimization of seeding rate was varied from agro-ecology to agro-ecology. Farmers and extension workers, therefore, consider varietal and location differences during seeding rate recommendation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the seeding rate up to 175 kg ha-1 significantly improved grain yield by about 23.5%.

Treatment
seeding rate up to 175 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
improvemente1
Value
23.5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two durum wheat varieties were assigned to the main plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result showed that an increase in the seeding rate up to 175 kg ha-1 caused a significant (P = 0.05) grain yield improvement by about 23.5% and biomass by 21.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing the seeding rate up to 175 kg ha-1 significantly improved biomass by about 21.5%.

Treatment
seeding rate up to 175 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
improvemente1
Value
21.5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two durum wheat varieties were assigned to the main plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“The result showed that an increase in the seeding rate up to 175 kg ha-1 caused a significant (P = 0.05) grain yield improvement by about 23.5% and biomass by 21.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand-grain weight, seeds per spike and spike length significantly decreased markedly with increasing seeding rate.

Treatment
increasing in the seeding ratee2
Outcome
thousand-grain weight, seeds spike-1, spike lengthe2
Direction
decreased markedlye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two durum wheat varieties were assigned to the main plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e2

“most of the yield components like thousand-grain weight, seeds spike-1, spike length, and a number of seeds spike-1 significantly (P = 0.05) decreased markedly with increasing in the seeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein content, gluten content and Zeleny index decreased as seeding rate increased.

Treatment
seeding rate increasede3
Outcome
grain protein content, gluten content, and Zeleny indexe3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two durum wheat varieties were assigned to the main plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e3

“The grain qualitative traits such as grain protein content, gluten content, and Zeleny index decreased with the seeding rate increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–951 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two durum wheat varieties responded differently to changing seeding rate.

Material
tested varietiese4
Treatment
changing seeding ratee4
Outcome
responsee4
Direction
differente4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two durum wheat varieties were assigned to the main plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e4

“The response of the tested varieties was different from the changing seeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of FeSO4 significantly ameliorated grain quality traits.

Treatment
Foliar application of FeSO4e5
Outcome
grain quality traitse5
Direction
amelioratede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two durum wheat varieties were assigned to the main plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar application of FeSO4 has significantly ameliorated grain quality traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1114 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein content was significantly higher in a dryland environment than in a wet environment.

Outcome
grain protein contente6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
wet environmente6
Setting
dryland environmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two durum wheat varieties were assigned to the main plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e6

“In a dryland environment, the grain protein content was significantly higher than in a wet environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1218 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Recommendations for seeding rate should consider varietal and location differences.

Outcome
seeding rate recommendatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two durum wheat varieties were assigned to the main plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e7

“Farmers and extension workers, therefore, consider varietal and location differences during seeding rate recommendation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1514 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal seeding rate varied from agro-ecology to agro-ecology.

Outcome
Optimization of seeding ratee5
Qualifier
varied from agro-ecology to agro-ecologye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two durum wheat varieties were assigned to the main plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 73–129 · show in text ↑
e5

“Optimization of seeding rate was varied from agro-ecology to agro-ecology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1393 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

density · growth · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · quality: grain · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

density · quality: protein · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.