Paper · 2021 · Naukovì dopovìdì Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu bìoresursiv ì prirodokoristuvannâ Ukraïni

Supply fertilization systems (ipomoea batatas) in the conditions of the left bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine

O. Kuts; S. Shevchenko; V. Mikhailin; et al.

20
claims
44
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The research was conducted during 2019–2020 in the laboratory of agrochemical research and product quality of the Institute of Vegetable and Melon NAAS. The soil of the experimental site - typical low-humus loamy chernozem on loess loam (in the plow layer (0-25 cm) of humus contained 4.3%N hydrolyzed - 139,0 mg/kg, mobile P - 106-119 mg/kg and exchangeable K - 93 mg/kg of soil, hydrolytic acidity - 2.8 mg-Eq per 100 g of soil, pH of salt extract - 5.7, the sum of absorbed bases - 26.0 mg-Eq per 100 g of soil). The research studied the effectiveness of different fertilizing systems: 1) without fertilizer (control); 2) N185P185K225; 3) N370P370K450; 4) N370P370K450 + foliar fertilization with complex fertilizer "Nutrivant plus universal" 2 kg / ha in 3 terms; 5) mold 20 t/ha + ash 1 t/ha 6) mold 20 t/ha + ash 1 t/ha + tillage planting soil fertilizer "Hraundfiks" (3 l/ha) + the first fertigation microbial drug " Azotophyte ”(1 l/ha) + for the second fertigation microbial preparation“ Organic Balance ”(1 l/ha) + foliar fertilization“ Help-rost for vegetable plants ”2 l/ha in 3 terms. Foliar fertilization was carried out in three terms: 30 days after planting (III decade of June), with active growth of vegetative mass (III decade of July), with active growth of tubers (III decade of August). The research was conducted in accordance with generally accepted methods. The total area of the plot was 33.6 m2, accounting - 21 m2, repetition - three times. In the study, sweet potatoes of the Slobozhansky Ruby variety were grown under drip irrigation, planting schemes (100 + 40) x 25 cm and mulching the soil with straw. According to the results of the study, it was found that the use of mineral and organic fertilizers by improving the nutritional conditions of plants provided an increase in the yield of sweet potato tubers and had a positive effect on their biochemical properties. On average, over the years of research, the use of different fertilizer systems causes an increase in the total yield of tubers by 5.3–8.7 t / ha or 34–56%, the yield of standard tubers - by 2.9–4.6 t / ha or 27–42 %. The highest level of sweet potato yield was provided by the use of N370P370K450 in combination with Nutrivant plus universal foliar fertilizers. The total yield of such a fertilizer system is 24.3 t / ha, of which 15.5 t / ha of standard tubers. According to our data, the effectiveness of increasing the dose of mineral fertilizers from N185P185K225 to N370P370K450 has not been proven, as there is no significant difference between the options. Additional fertilization with complex fertilizers provides a positive trend to increase the yield of sweet potatoes by 3.3 t/ha. The use of an organic fertilizer system (20 t / ha of humus and 1 t / ha of ash) provides an increase in the total yield of tubers by 6.7 t / ha or 43%, while the additional use of a set of microbial drugs is not justified by a significant increase in yield (22.8 t / ha). It was found that the use of organic fertilizers in combination with microbial preparations had the most positive effect on the biochemical composition of sweet potato tubers. Under this system of nutrition optimization, the dry matter content in tubers (18.6%), starch (9.06%) increased, and the low nitrate content (28.1 mg / kg) was noted. Under the mineral fertilizer system N370P370K450 with the use of complex fertilizers significantly increased the dry matter content (17.7%), however, the nitrate content was the highest in the experiment (78.5 mg / kg). There is a tendency to reduce the total sugar in sweet potato tubers with the use of all fertilizer systems, especially with the use of mineral fertilizer system N370P370K450 in combination with foliar fertilization "Nutrivant plus universal" (3.4% with the value of this indicator in control - 4.74%). To adjust the doses of mineral fertilizers under sweet potatoes, we calculated the absorption coefficients of nutrients from fertilizers and soil. It was found that on chernozem, a typical low-humus light loam plant, sweet potatoes absorb up to 57% of mobile forms of N, 11.6% of mobile forms of P and up to 61.2% of mobile forms of K. Nutrient utilization factors from mineral fertilizers are 40.7% for N; P - 26.1%, K - 73.5%. It should be noted that the utilization rates of soil nutrients vary not only depending on the biological characteristics of plants, but also due to changes in soil fertility, weather conditions, level of technological support, etc., which to some extent complicates their use in determining estimated doses of fertilizers. The rate of absorption of nutrients by sweet potato plants under different fertilizer systems was established. Without fertilizers, sweet potato plants absorb 88.2% N, 60.6% P and 80.5% K from the total consumption of plant nutrients in the first two months of growth. With mineral and organic fertilizer systems, the peak of nutrient consumption occurs at 2-3 months of plant growth, ie with the active formation and growth of tuber mass. Without the use of fertilizers by the end of the growing season significantly reduced uptake by plants P (104.4 kg/ha) and K (252.4 kg/ha), which, in our opinion, affect the reduction in yield yam. It should be noted that the uptake of K by sweet potato plants in the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine is higher than in the soils of the southern regions (according to Degras [34], the removal of K with sweet potato plants is 110–135 kg/ha). It is noted that depending on the fertilizer system 56.9–76.9% of N accumulates in the leaves, 10.2–13.6% in the stems, 12.9–29.5% in the roots and tubers. P 31.2–49.9% accumulates in leaves, 13.4–20% in stems, 30.1–55.4% in roots and tubers; for K 41.6–51.9% in leaves, 13.2–21.2% in stems, 26.9–45.2% in tubers and roots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer systems increased total sweet potato tuber yield by 5.3–8.7 t / ha or 34–56%.

Taxon
ipomoea batatasIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
different fertilizer systemse0
Outcome
total yield of tuberse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.3–8.7 t / hae0
Qualifier
34–56%e0
Comparator
without fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of different fertilizer systems causes an increase in the total yield of tubers by 5.3–8.7 t / ha or 34–56%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1941–2056 · show in text ↑
e1

“without fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“ipomoea batatas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer systems increased standard sweet potato tuber yield by 2.9–4.6 t / ha or 27–42%.

Taxon
ipomoea batatasIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
different fertilizer systemse1
Outcome
yield of standard tuberse0
Direction
increasee1
Value
2.9–4.6 t / hae0
Qualifier
27–42 %e0
Comparator
without fertilizer (control)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of standard tubers - by 2.9–4.6 t / ha or 27–42 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2058–2118 · show in text ↑
e1

“the use of different fertilizer systems causes an increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1941–1999 · show in text ↑
e2

“without fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“ipomoea batatas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N370P370K450 with Nutrivant foliar fertilizer gave the highest total yield, 24.3 t / ha.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
N370P370K450 in combination with Nutrivant plus universal foliar fertilizerse0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
24.3 t / hae0
Comparator
without fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest level of sweet potato yield was provided by the use of N370P370K450 in combination with Nutrivant plus universal foliar fertilizers. The total yield of such a fertilizer system is 24.3 t / ha, of which 15.5 t / ha of standard tubers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2364 · show in text ↑
e1

“without fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same fertilization system yielded 15.5 t / ha of standard tubers.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
N370P370K450 in combination with Nutrivant plus universal foliar fertilizerse0
Outcome
standard tuberse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.5 t / hae0
Comparator
without fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest level of sweet potato yield was provided by the use of N370P370K450 in combination with Nutrivant plus universal foliar fertilizers. The total yield of such a fertilizer system is 24.3 t / ha, of which 15.5 t / ha of standard tubers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2364 · show in text ↑
e1

“without fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mineral fertilizer from N185P185K225 to N370P370K450 produced no significant yield difference.

Taxon
sweet potatoesIpomoea batatase1
Treatment
N370P370K450e0
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
N185P185K225e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effectiveness of increasing the dose of mineral fertilizers from N185P185K225 to N370P370K450 has not been proven, as there is no significant difference between the options.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2388–2565 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of sweet potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2658–2681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional complex fertilizer gave a positive yield trend of 3.3 t/ha.

Taxon
sweet potatoesIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
Additional fertilization with complex fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
3.3 t/hae0
Comparator
without fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additional fertilization with complex fertilizers provides a positive trend to increase the yield of sweet potatoes by 3.3 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2566–2694 · show in text ↑
e1

“without fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased total tuber yield by 6.7 t / ha or 43%.

Taxon
ipomoea batatasIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
20 t / ha of humus and 1 t / ha of ashe0
Outcome
total yield of tuberse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6.7 t / hae0
Qualifier
43%e0
Comparator
without fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of an organic fertilizer system (20 t / ha of humus and 1 t / ha of ash) provides an increase in the total yield of tubers by 6.7 t / ha or 43%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2695–2846 · show in text ↑
e1

“without fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“ipomoea batatas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding microbial drugs to organic fertilizer did not significantly increase yield, which reached 22.8 t / ha.

Taxon
ipomoea batatasIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
set of microbial drugse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
not justified by a significant increasee0
Value
22.8 t / hae0
Comparator
organic fertilizer systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the additional use of a set of microbial drugs is not justified by a significant increase in yield (22.8 t / ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2854–2967 · show in text ↑
e1

“organic fertilizer system (20 t / ha of humus and 1 t / ha of ash)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2709–2775 · show in text ↑
t0

“ipomoea batatas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer plus microbial preparations increased tuber dry matter to 18.6%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
organic fertilizers in combination with microbial preparationse0
Outcome
dry matter content in tuberse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.6%e0
Comparator
without fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of organic fertilizers in combination with microbial preparations had the most positive effect on the biochemical composition of sweet potato tubers. Under this system of nutrition optimization, the dry matter content in tubers (18.6%), starch (9.06%) increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2986–3255 · show in text ↑
e1

“without fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer plus microbial preparations increased tuber starch to 9.06%.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
organic fertilizers in combination with microbial preparationse0
Outcome
starche0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.06%e0
Comparator
without fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of organic fertilizers in combination with microbial preparations had the most positive effect on the biochemical composition of sweet potato tubers. Under this system of nutrition optimization, the dry matter content in tubers (18.6%), starch (9.06%) increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2986–3255 · show in text ↑
e1

“without fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer plus microbial preparations yielded low nitrate content of 28.1 mg / kg.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
organic fertilizers in combination with microbial preparationse0
Outcome
nitrate contente0
Direction
lowe0
Value
28.1 mg / kge0
Comparator
without fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of organic fertilizers in combination with microbial preparations had the most positive effect on the biochemical composition of sweet potato tubers. Under this system of nutrition optimization, the dry matter content in tubers (18.6%), starch (9.06%) increased, and the low nitrate content (28.1 mg / kg) was noted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2986–3310 · show in text ↑
e1

“without fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral and complex fertilizer increased tuber dry matter to 17.7%.

Taxon
ipomoea batatasIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
N370P370K450 with the use of complex fertilizerse0
Outcome
dry matter contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.7%e0
Comparator
without fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the mineral fertilizer system N370P370K450 with the use of complex fertilizers significantly increased the dry matter content (17.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3311–3450 · show in text ↑
e1

“without fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“ipomoea batatas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mineral plus complex fertilizer treatment had the highest nitrate content, 78.5 mg / kg.

Taxon
ipomoea batatasIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
N370P370K450 with the use of complex fertilizerse0
Outcome
nitrate contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
78.5 mg / kge0
Comparator
without fertilizer (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the mineral fertilizer system N370P370K450 with the use of complex fertilizers significantly increased the dry matter content (17.7%), however, the nitrate content was the highest in the experiment (78.5 mg / kg).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3311–3530 · show in text ↑
e1

“without fertilizer (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“ipomoea batatas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All fertilizer systems tended to reduce tuber total sugar; N370P370K450 plus Nutrivant gave 3.4% versus 4.74% in control.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
N370P370K450 in combination with foliar fertilization "Nutrivant plus universal"e0
Outcome
total sugare0
Direction
reducee0
Value
3.4%e0
Qualifier
4.74%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There is a tendency to reduce the total sugar in sweet potato tubers with the use of all fertilizer systems, especially with the use of mineral fertilizer system N370P370K450 in combination with foliar fertilization "Nutrivant plus universal" (3.4% with the value of this indicator in control - 4.74%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3531–3833 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet potato absorbed up to 57% of mobile N, 11.6% of P, and 61.2% of K on chernozem.

Taxon
sweet potatoesIpomoea batatase0
Outcome
mobile forms of N, 11.6% of mobile forms of P and up to 61.2% of mobile forms of Ke0
Setting
chernozeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on chernozem, a typical low-humus light loam plant, sweet potatoes absorb up to 57% of mobile forms of N, 11.6% of mobile forms of P and up to 61.2% of mobile forms of K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3999–4169 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient utilization from mineral fertilizer was 40.7% for N, 26.1% for P, and 73.5% for K.

Taxon
ipomoea batatasIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
Nutrient utilization factors from mineral fertilizerse0
Value
40.7% for N; P - 26.1%, K - 73.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient utilization factors from mineral fertilizers are 40.7% for N; P - 26.1%, K - 73.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4170–4262 · show in text ↑
t0

“ipomoea batatas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without fertilizer, most N, P, and K uptake occurred in the first two months of growth.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Outcome
88.2% N, 60.6% P and 80.5% Ke0
Qualifier
first two months of growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without fertilizers, sweet potato plants absorb 88.2% N, 60.6% P and 80.5% K from the total consumption of plant nutrients in the first two months of growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4698–4855 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With mineral and organic fertilizer, nutrient consumption peaked at 2–3 months of growth.

Taxon
ipomoea batatasIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
peak of nutrient consumptione0
Value
2-3 monthse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With mineral and organic fertilizer systems, the peak of nutrient consumption occurs at 2-3 months of plant growth, ie with the active formation and growth of tuber mass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4856–5026 · show in text ↑
t0

“ipomoea batatas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Without fertilizer, end-season P and K uptake fell to 104.4 and 252.4 kg/ha.

Taxon
ipomoea batatasIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
uptake by plants P (104.4 kg/ha) and K (252.4 kg/ha)e0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Without the use of fertilizers by the end of the growing season significantly reduced uptake by plants P (104.4 kg/ha) and K (252.4 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5027–5165 · show in text ↑
t0

“ipomoea batatas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient partitioning varied by fertilizer system, with most N, P, and K accumulating in leaves.

Taxon
ipomoea batatasIpomoea batatast0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
Ne0
Value
56.9–76.9%e0
Qualifier
depending on the fertilizer systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“depending on the fertilizer system 56.9–76.9% of N accumulates in the leaves, 10.2–13.6% in the stems, 12.9–29.5% in the roots and tubers. P 31.2–49.9% accumulates in leaves, 13.4–20% in stems, 30.1–55.4% in roots and tubers; for K 41.6–51.9% in leaves, 13.2–21.2% in stems, 26.9–45.2% in tubers and roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5477–5783 · show in text ↑
t0

“ipomoea batatas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

fertilization · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 126 positive, 19 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.