Paper · 2013 · ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA

Effect of Interaction between Nitrogen Rate and Irrigation Regime on Grain Yield and Quality of Rice

Zhang Zi

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study investigated how nitrogen rates and irrigation regimes and their interactions affect grain yield and quality of rice, which would have great significance in conducting the cultivation for high yielding, good quality and high efficiency. Two rice cultivars, Liangyoupeijiu (indica) and Yangjing 4038 (japonica), were grown in the tanks filled with soil. Three irrigation regimes, conventional irrigation (CI), alternate irrigation with wetting and moderate drying (WMD) and alternate irrigation with wetting and severe drying (WSD), and three nitrogen (N) rates, 0N (0 kg ha –1 ), medium amount of N (MN, 240 kg ha–1 ), and high amount of N (HN, 360 kg ha–1 ), were used during the whole growing season. The results showed that, at either MN or HN rate, grain yield, head rice, apparant quality, and breakdown were significantly higher or better under the WMD regime than under the CI regime. At the MN rate, the WSD regime significantly decreased grain yield and quality as compared with the CI regime. At the HN rate, however, the grain yield was higher under the WSD regime than under the CI regime and grain quality showed no significant difference between the two irrigation regimes. The WMD regime significantly increased photosynthetic rate of the flag leaf, activity of adenosine triphosphate enzyme (ATPase) in grains and contents of indole-3-acetic acid, zeatin + zeatin riboside, and abscisic acid in roots during grain filling. All the data indicate that interactions between nitrogen rates and irrigation regimes mediate the grain yield and quality of rice. Stronger root activity, greater leaf photosynthetic rate and larger sink strength contribute to higher grain yield and better grain quality of rice under the MN rate and WMD regime.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At MN or HN rate, grain yield was higher under WMD than under CI irrigation

Treatment
WMD regimee1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
at either MN or HN ratee1
Comparator
CI regimee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“at either MN or HN rate, grain yield, head rice, apparant quality, and breakdown were significantly higher or better under the WMD regime than under the CI regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At MN or HN rate, head rice, apparent quality and breakdown were higher or better under WMD than under CI irrigation

Treatment
WMD regimee1
Outcome
head rice, apparant quality, and breakdowne1
Direction
higher or bettere1
Qualifier
at either MN or HN ratee1
Comparator
CI regimee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“at either MN or HN rate, grain yield, head rice, apparant quality, and breakdown were significantly higher or better under the WMD regime than under the CI regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At MN rate, WSD irrigation significantly decreased grain yield and quality compared with CI

Treatment
WSD regimee2
Outcome
grain yield and qualitye2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
At the MN ratee2
Comparator
CI regimee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“At the MN rate, the WSD regime significantly decreased grain yield and quality as compared with the CI regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At HN rate, grain yield was higher under WSD than under CI irrigation

Treatment
WSD regimee3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
At the HN ratee3
Comparator
CI regimee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“At the HN rate, however, the grain yield was higher under the WSD regime than under the CI regime and grain quality showed no significant difference between the two irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At HN rate, grain quality did not differ significantly between WSD and CI irrigation

Treatment
WSD regimee3
Outcome
grain qualitye3
Direction
no significant differencee3
Qualifier
At the HN ratee3
Comparator
CI regimee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“At the HN rate, however, the grain yield was higher under the WSD regime than under the CI regime and grain quality showed no significant difference between the two irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WMD significantly increased photosynthetic rate of the flag leaf during grain filling

Organ / stage
flag leafe4
Treatment
WMD regimee4
Outcome
photosynthetic rate of the flag leafe4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“The WMD regime significantly increased photosynthetic rate of the flag leaf, activity of adenosine triphosphate enzyme (ATPase) in grains and contents of indole-3-acetic acid, zeatin + zeatin riboside, and abscisic acid in roots during grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WMD significantly increased ATPase activity in grains

Organ / stage
grainse4
Treatment
WMD regimee4
Gene
adenosine triphosphate enzyme (ATPase)e4
Outcome
activity of adenosine triphosphate enzyme (ATPase)e4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“The WMD regime significantly increased photosynthetic rate of the flag leaf, activity of adenosine triphosphate enzyme (ATPase) in grains and contents of indole-3-acetic acid, zeatin + zeatin riboside, and abscisic acid in roots during grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WMD significantly increased IAA, zeatin plus zeatin riboside and ABA contents in roots during grain filling

Organ / stage
rootse4
Treatment
WMD regimee4
Outcome
contents of indole-3-acetic acid, zeatin + zeatin riboside, and abscisic acide4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“The WMD regime significantly increased photosynthetic rate of the flag leaf, activity of adenosine triphosphate enzyme (ATPase) in grains and contents of indole-3-acetic acid, zeatin + zeatin riboside, and abscisic acid in roots during grain filling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1448 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stronger root activity, greater leaf photosynthetic rate and larger sink strength contribute to higher grain yield and better grain quality under MN rate and WMD regime

Treatment
MN rate and WMD regimee5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Qualifier
Stronger root activity, greater leaf photosynthetic rate and larger sink strengthe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“Stronger root activity, greater leaf photosynthetic rate and larger sink strength contribute to higher grain yield and better grain quality of rice under the MN rate and WMD regime”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1761 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interactions between nitrogen rates and irrigation regimes mediate grain yield and quality of rice

Treatment
interactions between nitrogen rates and irrigation regimese6
Outcome
grain yield and qualitye6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grain Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–100 · show in text ↑
e6

“interactions between nitrogen rates and irrigation regimes mediate the grain yield and quality of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1579 · show in text ↑

processing · physiology: hormones · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

processing · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 19 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

processing · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 31 positive, 24 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

processing · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 88 positive, 26 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

processing · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

processing · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.