Paper · 2002 · 中国农业科学:英文版

Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Water logging at Booting and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Waterlogging Tolerance

Zhou; Guang-sheng; Zhu; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of waterlogging on some physiological characters and relationship between waterlogging tolerance and some characters of their own were studied by using 12 varieties of wheat. Results showed waterlogging made the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, made the root vigor, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content of flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously, and then the yield per plant declined. The correlations between waterlogging tolerance and the water conservation ability of flag leaf, the content of free amino acids and starch in secondary root at booting, the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant, the content of malondialdehyde and water in flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in leaves were significant or highly significant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging increased malondialdehyde content in the flag leaf of wheat.

Organ / stage
flag leafe1
Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
content of malondialdehydee1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were studied by using 12 varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed waterlogging made the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, made the root vigor, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content of flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously, and then the yield per plant declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased root vigor, chlorophyll content and net photosynthesis rate of wheat.

Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
root vigor, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis ratee1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were studied by using 12 varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed waterlogging made the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, made the root vigor, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content of flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously, and then the yield per plant declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging decreased nitrate reductase activity and relative water content of the flag leaf.

Organ / stage
flag leafe1
Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content of flag leafe1
Direction
decreasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were studied by using 12 varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed waterlogging made the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, made the root vigor, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content of flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously, and then the yield per plant declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging declined the yield per plant of wheat.

Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
yield per plante1
Direction
declinede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were studied by using 12 varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed waterlogging made the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, made the root vigor, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content of flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously, and then the yield per plant declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging changed the content of organic matter in wheat obviously.

Treatment
waterlogginge1
Outcome
content of organic mattere1
Direction
change obviouslye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were studied by using 12 varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed waterlogging made the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf increase, made the root vigor, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content of flag leaf decrease, the content of organic matter change obviously, and then the yield per plant declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–515 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging tolerance was significantly correlated with the water conservation ability of the flag leaf.

Organ / stage
flag leafe2
Outcome
water conservation ability of flag leafe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were studied by using 12 varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–181 · show in text ↑
e2

“The correlations between waterlogging tolerance and the water conservation ability of flag leaf, the content of free amino acids and starch in secondary root at booting, the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant, the content of malondialdehyde and water in flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in leaves were significant or highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–871 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging tolerance was significantly correlated with the content of free amino acids and starch in secondary roots at booting.

Organ / stage
secondary root at bootinge2
Outcome
content of free amino acids and starche2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were studied by using 12 varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–181 · show in text ↑
e2

“The correlations between waterlogging tolerance and the water conservation ability of flag leaf, the content of free amino acids and starch in secondary root at booting, the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant, the content of malondialdehyde and water in flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in leaves were significant or highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–871 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging tolerance was significantly correlated with the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant.

Treatment
waterlogginge2
Outcome
percentage of stem yield in yield per plante2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were studied by using 12 varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–181 · show in text ↑
e2

“The correlations between waterlogging tolerance and the water conservation ability of flag leaf, the content of free amino acids and starch in secondary root at booting, the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant, the content of malondialdehyde and water in flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in leaves were significant or highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–871 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging tolerance was significantly correlated with the content of malondialdehyde and water in the flag leaf.

Organ / stage
flag leafe2
Outcome
content of malondialdehyde and water in flag leafe2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were studied by using 12 varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–181 · show in text ↑
e2

“The correlations between waterlogging tolerance and the water conservation ability of flag leaf, the content of free amino acids and starch in secondary root at booting, the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant, the content of malondialdehyde and water in flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in leaves were significant or highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–871 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Waterlogging tolerance was significantly correlated with the content of free amino acids in leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese2
Outcome
content of free amino acids in leavese2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were studied by using 12 varieties of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–181 · show in text ↑
e2

“The correlations between waterlogging tolerance and the water conservation ability of flag leaf, the content of free amino acids and starch in secondary root at booting, the percentage of stem yield in yield per plant, the content of malondialdehyde and water in flag leaf, the content of free amino acids in leaves were significant or highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–871 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

22 papers: 2 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

44 papers: 7 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

flooding · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 17 positive, 85 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

flooding · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.